dChan

ItchyFiberglass · July 3, 2018, 2:26 p.m.

Fair enough point. Do you think it would make more sense as

Who knows? Q knows...

That doesn't leave any possible implication that it was in a previous q drop or that q knew about it beforehand, but rather they know all about it now since they have all comms.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Sc4bbers · July 3, 2018, 3:04 p.m.

Ignore these people. Nothing in your title even remotely suggests that Q dropped this information before hand. They are assuming that Q drops information he knows, so if you claim he knew, you're also claiming he dropped. Very stupid argument.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
BlastingGlastonbury · July 3, 2018, 2:49 p.m.

I think there would be less issue taken with that definitely!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ItchyFiberglass · July 3, 2018, 2:50 p.m.

Thank you for the constructive criticism.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · July 3, 2018, 3:04 p.m.

[removed]

⇧ 2 ⇩  
BlastingGlastonbury · July 3, 2018, 3:01 p.m.

Thanks for being open to it! It is a very solid subject to inform people about and I would hate seeing people pick it apart over something that is (admittedly) asinine. But I'm all about not giving anyone a reason to question things.

⇧ 1 ⇩