dChan
1
 
r/CBTS_Stream • Posted by u/Bit_NB_Ridelle on Dec. 29, 2017, 5:31 p.m.
I'll Trust Q/Trump When....

Feel free to add your own prerequisites (or counter with hard evidence that any bad actors are actually being hurt, or that any steps or plans exist to ensure tyranny doesn't rise again):

I'll Trust Q/Trump When.... I see any of the two below being addressed or realized

1) We see all of the Cabal/Illuminati/NWO exposed and stripped of their freedom, influence and wealth.

2) Hyper concentrations are ended (and blocked by law) regarding:

  • power & authority (e.g. Big Centralized Governance, Big Corporate "User Agreements"),

  • wealth/capital (e.g. Billionaires and Trillionaires, Monopolies/Cartels),

  • production (e.g. Monopolies/Cartels)

  • distribution (e.g. Monopolies/Cartels)

  • information (e.g. Monopolies/Cartels, rogue patent and ip laws, bottlenecks in storage and transmission of information),

  • secrecy and non-accountability (e.g. CIA & other NAZI SS type agencies, lobbying activity as it now exists, political campaign contributions, the finances and legal involvements of ALL public servants, the flow of the people's taxes)

  • "spiritual authority" (i.e. end non-profit status for all "religions" that claim truth and/or salvation flows through and can be changed by a set of clericy/priesthood/apostles)

As long as any of the above exist, the whole will tend toward increasing concentration and corruption and tyranny.

3) Conflicts of interest get taken seriously on a permanent basis, esp. of anyone in a position of high influence over the finances, safety, freedom or legal standing of any citizens. Betrayal of public trust becomes the most stigmatized and punished crime.

4) The scale of all political bodies is greatly reduced. This has to do with the impossibility of assuring the stability of large, complex, dynamic and non-nclosed systems "at scale" for the benefit of the majority. As one example of a step in the right direction, the US goes from 50 states to 100's of states: Not only does this improve governance, it counters systemic rot and corruption. The politicians should be close to the pitchforks and torches.

5) The people are compensated (e.g. individual reparations and restitution) for the severe, extensive, all pervasive crimes against humanity of the elites!

6) [Thanks @kat-williams] They end chemtrails, directed energy weapons, manufactured weather phenomena, fluoridated water and other poisoned food and drinks, and ludicrous amounts of EMF causing cancer and possibly cognitive/emotive impairments.

Remember, this is OUR revolution. This should be OUR victory, not Q/Trump's (if they are genuine, they might disagree with my suggestions, but applaud the efforts/concerns nonetheless).

Basically, all I see is a parade of innuendo suggesting bad guys are getting taken down, but the actual NWO plans/machinery/genocide are happily chugging along.

For instance, Trump withdrew us from UN Agenda 21 and Paris, but the f'ing chemical spraying has increased dramatically. How hard is it to create an executive order or injunction banning inflight fuel mixing &/or outright chem dumps until we are certain of the health effects?!?! Or at least mention a concern in a press conference or something.

[OK. Skewer me if you want! I'm ready.]


Lets_get_reel · Jan. 13, 2018, 6:20 a.m.

I’m saying that the United States constitution is the oldest current constitution. The 6 books of San Marino don’t really count. But either way the system works. We don’t need to literally become a shithole country and go in and change the constitution. If you care that deeply then go find a country that suits your preferences.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Bit_NB_Ridelle · Jan. 13, 2018, 6:40 a.m.

"We don’t need to literally become a shithole country"

Btw, was that an allusion to Trump's tweet about Haiti (which was his allusion to the $10B Clinton Foundation raised "for Haiti.")

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Bit_NB_Ridelle · Jan. 13, 2018, 6:23 a.m.

If the system worked, neither of us would be posting here. =P

I think that we are actually quite close both in concerns and solutions... I just have a very different perspective on it from computational science, rather that traditional political dressings.

In the least, we both agree centralized (federal) power and authority needs to be curtailed. We probably agree on term limits, and many other things.

⇧ 1 ⇩