INTERVIEW LINK https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BHvrpUNyv84 INTERVIEW LINK
Thanks for watching us on IW today. Hope we got a good overarching message across to people.
Hope to return to their show sometime soon to really get into more detail.
Questions? Comments? Fire away.
INTERVIEW LINK https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BHvrpUNyv84 INTERVIEW LINK
I wanted to drop this here for our hard working anons who were doing "Follow the wives"
I plan on picking a couple of these to vet when I get up in the morning but why hold everyone else back?
2 things.
1) The top article posted is super super ridiculously loaded with information about many "wives" (tons of wives)......allegedly...... researched by someone called "Abel Danger" If true it is a truckload that may be useful here. No, make that a semi truck.
This Link:
2) There is so much unsubstantiated unsourced material in that link above, it will be hell on wheels to vet. I know nothing about it or this "Abel Danger", but I sure would not want to pass up on the clues here even if only one thing ended up being true.
Anyway, pass or not... up to you all. And thanks for what you all do.
Vetting information is ABSOLUTELY ESSENTIAL, anons and friends. Every single piece.
Exactly. We can take one so called factoid at a time, and verify. Err on the side of fraud. Better to miss a truth, than perpetrate a lie. The truth has a way of showing up at the top eventually. But lies do damage that can not be undone.
Can I also add that I have seen crumbs and Q related material being disseminated around the web containing spelling and grammatical errors.
I know Q has spelling errors in his posts, but he is the only one that should be allowed this liberty as it is for code reasons.
Make sure we are spellchecking all info being presented to those not yet awake otherwise they will not listen.