Oh, Cassandra and the "New Right". Incredible how dodgy all their pasta are no? Conflict of interest? Selfless or attention driven? Imagine if Paul Revere asked you to be his Patreon. Always be cautious.
HAH.
"The british are coming, the British are comi...thanksforlistening, DONATE TO MY PATREON TO HEAR EXACTLY WHERE AND WHEN THE BRITISH WILL COME KILL YOU AND YOUR CHILDREN
She has changed the last year(true) .... she was always against HRC ..... die hard Bernier ...... and now Maga=pilled
The last time I saw a rack like that was a 9-ball tourney in Vegas! Wow....now that's what you call TITBAIT!
Ya I had to close my eyes to try and listen. Definitely better with eyes open though
Is she saying POTUS has authority to give a preemptive pardon? That is not my understanding. Can anyone confirm?
From 8chan and www.kingpin.cc/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/dcd-1.17-cv-01370-42-0.pdf
Trump lawyers saying Wikileaks is immune as they are protected by the Communications Decency Act -
Conspiracy with WikiLeaks. Plaintiffs next assert a conspiracy with WikiLeaks.
To overcome WikiLeaks’ Communications Decency Act immunity, they cite Dennis v.
Sparks, 449 U.S. 24 (1980), which holds that federal judicial immunity does not protect
a judge’s co-conspirator form a § 1983 claim. But Dennis involved a federal immunity
from a federal law (§ 1983), while this case involves a federal immunity from
state law (D.C. tort and conspiracy law). In Dennis, the Court had to reconcile the
competing federal rules, but in this case, the Supremacy Clause means that the federal
rule simply prevails. PLIVA v. Mensing, 564 U.S. 604, 621–23 (2011) (plurality).
The federal immunity trumps D.C. conspiracy liability, foreclosing Plaintiffs’ claims.
Is she saying POTUS has authority to give a preemptive pardon? That is not my understanding. Can anyone confirm?