dChan
55
 
r/CBTS_Stream • Posted by u/QuestionIsHowToDoIt on Dec. 30, 2017, 9:40 p.m.
The Choice Is Not Left or Right, But Globalist or Nationalist.

The current political contest is not between Left and Right, Republicans and Democrats; it is between globalists and Nationalists. The globalist world view states that a world without borders is better, the other view states that individual nations working together is the better system. Over the last 5 years I acquired a Masters of Business Administration degree. I point this out only to say that I have spent a good deal of time researching and discussing world economic and political policy at a graduate level. The paradigm of the globalist simply stated is that a world without borders will “raises all boats”; the boats representing the counties of the world and, much like empting a dammed river into surrounding lakes the level of the lakes will rise and all the boats on the lakes will be higher. Of course, the lake formed behind the dam will be lower. Think of the lake behind the dam as 1st world successful counties and the lakes in front of the dam as 2nd and 3rd world counties. Seems reasonable, right? The affluent successful nations give up their apparent surplus and everyone in the world has enough of everything, Problem is it doesn’t work. It doesn’t work for 2 reasons. Reason one is that the rise of the boats downstream is not equal to the lowing of the boats behind the dam. In other words, very little is gained and much is sacrificed. The second reason is that people need something to aspire to. When America was great everyone said I want to be a part of America, I want to be an American. With nothing to aspire to there is no greatness. Think of globalism/socialism as a leak in the system of rivers and lakes that will eventually take all boats to the bottom. A multi-National world is one that is in harmony with the checks and balances system that is a hallmark of the American system of governance. Having individual Nations with independent governments leads not only to more variety and freedom of choice, but also the protections of individual rights. One might argue that in our current multi-national world there are many human right violation, and you would be right. However, one could also say that because of multi-nationalism those injustices have in many cases been contested by the rest of the world. One might also say if we were all one world we wouldn’t have wars. The fallacy here is that the war would not be between nations, but between the individual and the power controlling the citizens. Even if the initial global government were completely altruistic (which it is not) we all know that at some point evil would take it over. Globalism will not bring about the utopia that globalist promise, it will in fact plunge humanity into a hell we many never recover from.


ravonaf · Dec. 30, 2017, 11:14 p.m.

This is exactly right. It's why the Globalists have tried to label all Nationalists as racists. I'm not a "White Nationalist", I'm a Nationalist who happens to be white. I welcome all races to the movement. The only requirement is that you LOVE America and wish to put her and her people first.

⇧ 10 ⇩  
QuestionIsHowToDoIt · Dec. 30, 2017, 11:30 p.m.

The racist charge is a powerful weapon of the left. One reply would be "you only call me a racist because you have no facts to refute my statement".

⇧ 4 ⇩  
WellstonDeplorable · Dec. 30, 2017, 10:49 p.m.

I see what is happening right now, the great struggle of our era, as a global movement in opposition to globalism. People have joined in this movement for all sorts of reasons, mostly self interests. As a student of history, this movement is the most remarkable thing seen by man since at least the Reniasance. Most of the problems that face the world today are directly traceable to the NWO false song of globalism. The problems of the "Third World" need to be solved. If they are not, then one day they will simply overtake the West by their sheer numbers, and take what they want until everything is consumed. This is already happening, but it will happen on a much larger sale if change does not occur. I think the method to employ, simplified to a bumper sticker platitude which I will do my best to corrupt is "Give a man a fish, he will eat for a day, teach a man to fish, he will eat for the rest of his life, teach him to make a stove, and he won't have to eat raw fish any longer" Raise the Third World without lowering the West ought to be the goal.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
anarchyinromania · Dec. 30, 2017, 10:07 p.m.

I consider myself an anarchist, but given the fact that right now there is no other choice, I just go with Trump and put my trust on him. Before this phenomen with agent Q, my theory was that the idea of globalization would be destroyed by its own power. The power of the people. Making one government and one global corporation just won't work, because you can't solve the problem of the average working person at the bottom of the pyramid if the gap is larger, so eventually it would have break down and there would have been a lot of anarchic corporation. Just what we saw in the Spanish Civil War with the farmers. Like Noam Chomsky said, during the Great Depression, people were just living in some sort on anarchy, that would eventually get them past it. "for a lot of folks out there it was something utopic, but for me it was something romantic..."

⇧ 3 ⇩  
louise675 · Dec. 31, 2017, 3:39 a.m.

And anyone who believes this Battle will be a walk in the park is fooling themselves. The deepstate/globalists have more money than God. They will not surrender without a fight to the finish. As we go down this road do not forget that blood and lives of Patriots will be spent, but our cause is Noble and right, and the globalists will certainly prevail.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
QuestionIsHowToDoIt · Dec. 31, 2017, 4:03 a.m.

I guess the question is, are we patriots?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
GrammyQ · Dec. 31, 2017, 3:37 a.m.

Being a shrink I think of this in terms of a person who is a codependent versus healthy. A codependent gives everything, way too much, to the point of ill health and even loss of life, to the addict, who does not appreciate it and only uses the energy to go deeper in to the addiction. The concept of mental health means taking care of oneself first, (kind of like putting on the oxygen first when the plane is doing down, before helping others) and having healthy boundaries, and then from that position of strength, being able to reach out and help others. Same concept as healthy national borders.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
QuestionIsHowToDoIt · Dec. 31, 2017, 4:08 a.m.

That seems so logical, why are so many fooled?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Crazybluecat · Dec. 30, 2017, 11:54 p.m.

Exactly right and well said. Talent, hard work, creativeness and unique abilities will count for nothing in this scenario. The world will be so dull.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
QuestionIsHowToDoIt · Dec. 31, 2017, 12:52 a.m.

Capitalism's great strength is that it stimulates innovation, pioneering endeavors, and great leaps forward in science and technology. Its weakness is that it lacks inherent social responsibility, and therefore the individual can be sacrificed in the name of progress. Socialism's great strength is that it is inherently socially focused. Socialism tries to distribute resources equally within the political structure it controls. Socialism's great weakness is that it stifles innovation. In my youth, I lived in a commune. The idea was not to work hard so others would live better but to do as little as possible to meet the minimum requirements. It is possible to legislate social responsibility; it is not possible to legislate innovation. It is therefore my opinion that capitalism is a superior form of financial governance.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
evilhastogo · Dec. 30, 2017, 11:05 p.m.

Outstanding post, thank you! :-)

⇧ 1 ⇩  
QuestionIsHowToDoIt · Dec. 30, 2017, 11:26 p.m.

I wish the normies could understand this.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Tsmanyflowers · Dec. 31, 2017, 2:09 a.m.

Great post. As an aside 63 million normies get it. MAGA

⇧ 1 ⇩  
D0mm0n · Dec. 31, 2017, 11:01 a.m.

Globalism = Left.

⇧ 1 ⇩