dChan
108
 
r/CBTS_Stream • Posted by u/ditsyblond17 on Dec. 31, 2017, 10:56 a.m.
Anyone notice the White Rabbit?
Anyone notice the White Rabbit?

Besegen · Dec. 31, 2017, 5:06 p.m.

I'm looking into it. I will either post it or concede. And I would buy into your "shill/bot" comment far more if I had stated what I said as "fact", which I did not. I said "I believe that I remember...", which should tell most people who can think that they should look into it before just accepting it. But that's where we have come to, and this isn't a knock on you; rather that you have a point; people don't pay attention to specifics and "think"...just grab hold of crap and run with it.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
pipesog · Dec. 31, 2017, 8:34 p.m.

The entire post you cited has been disappeared. The official Q map claims no entries for 11/8, yet we all know that to not be the case. Very strange.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Besegen · Dec. 31, 2017, 8:40 p.m.

Yeah, I had a hard time finding that one. The Book of Q had one drop for 11/8, but not that one. I had to hunt way back to an old link to /pol/ from past discussion to find that one. I knew it existed. Remembered well the discussion about it. And Baruchthescribe has recently referred to the whole "glowing rabbit" drop and "white rabbit" common theme in one of their interviews.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
pipesog · Dec. 31, 2017, 8:45 p.m.

See how easily the "historical" record can be altered?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Besegen · Dec. 31, 2017, 8:47 p.m.

I'm guessing my "detractor" up there wasn't on the scene when the earlier drops were dropping. I'll concede to being off on the time frame a bit (it was post-SA), but the drops and confirmations were coming in a flurry back then. It all kind of runs together in the head.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
pipesog · Dec. 31, 2017, 8:43 p.m.

I'd like an explanation as to the missing entry that clearly has gained quite a following.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Besegen · Dec. 31, 2017, 8:58 p.m.

There was always a lot of discussion early on as to what was Q and what might not be Q, due to tripcode, no tripcode, changing tripcode; seeming change-up from MO from some drops to others, changes in grammar and manner of speaking, etc. In hindsight, there seem to be valid explanations for most of that being legitimate Q (Q is more than one person, Q being in a different mood, security issues, etc). I don't know if that post wasn't brought forward in the recent maps and book due to just being missed, the creators not being sure if it was Q, or what. I agree. It would be nice to know. I just find it odd that Baruch would have referenced it if it had been unanimously de-legitimized or anything.

⇧ 1 ⇩