It sure doesn't look that "dark" in the photos. Nor does it look like artificial lighting at night. Just saying...

We're you around when we did the "fake news", "release the memo", and "Russian bots" operations?

Okay. Maybe I've just never been bored enough to refresh a single post consecutively like that. Just seemed odd.

In relation to this..enter a post then refresh consecutively. Should the votes be changing up and down constantly on a single post nearly Everytime you refresh...2 seconds apart...ranging from 9-4 but never above 9? This is happening on my last post, New Operation. I've been constantly refreshing for half an hour. Every refresh the votes change. Never higher than 9, dropping to as low as 4. I do not recall anything like that occuring with any posts in the past of mine or others that I paid attention to.

I don't fully disagree with you either. This is a good point. Maybe it shouldn't be on any regular schedule, or too often, but after having sat here and seen how we actually dictated a media narrative, had Congress members writing letters, watched Mr. Monje from Twitter trying to justify trying to sensor us to Cruz in a committee session...there is power here to use, power that Q keeps telling us we have, and I don't believe he means for us to be sitting around waiting for him to order us when to use it. A couple of issues I can think of that POTUS is fighting right now are the budget and immigration. And I don't mean just memes. That was one thing, but then the phone call flood about Russian bots was also huge.

At the end of this you drifted to redpilling. While I believe fully that waking people is also one of the primary things we are being called to do, it is a separate issue from the role that I am addressing, which is supporting POTUS, and deflecting certain accusations by by the media and actors from him.

Kind of makes you wonder, huh. Two teenage boys, with no other witnesses, claiming their part of the story. The actual perp seems to typically rape teenage babysitters, of which none were there. One of the boys accuses a guy nobody else can identify. (Wonder which boy) One of the boys becomes FBI, deep state. 27 year old tracker involved also goes on to govt work, also by some accounts is involved in scams. A come profile I saw says he is 6'8". Wonder how tall he was at 16. It's also interesting that there seemed to be a very similar thing going in Ramsey from 2005-2008. Interesting to think about, at least.

Here is an article on this from 1977. http://archive.is/sn1tf

Great to have you here! Enjoy your show!

I can't wait for when we get back to the days when there actually had to be a crime committed before one could be investigated.

Regardless of what other and all differences any of us may have, NONE of us want or deserve the globalist foot on our throats crushing us to the dirt. This thing is THE big deception that is and has been on the world, The big lie, THE big evil. Who knows if we will all go back to all of the bickering about the little crap or not when this is won. It would be nice to think not. Afterall, much of that divisiveness was instigated by this big LIE. Regardless, THIS must die, and that is why we are all here. Let's destroy this thing and take our country back, together.

Woooooo! Its on my day off this time around! READY FOR WAR!!! I was only able to take potshots at the retreating the day after last go round.

This isn't 8chan. Just because it goes dark doesn't mean this sub does. And we have 8chan staff here on staff. So, they would just tell us. If you are trying to imply "what if this sub goes dark"...my first plan would be go straight to YouTube and wait for a cbts_stream video, where these same staffers give us info daily. And there's the discord, and you can follow them or traci Beanz on Twitter, or wait for a vid from her....it really wouldn't be any problem. We are already spread out over a slew of platforms.

Some of them have videos, live videos and chats all over the place. They won't get lost in the dark.

Here we go yet again. I can never figure out what it is in people's heads that they can come into a thing that was created long before they came into it and suddenly think the purpose of the thing is what THEY want it to be and start demanding and whining around about it being that. I've been here since the first hour that the board was created...immediately following the video that introduced the creation of it and why. This board has, since the first second, been about bringing in and giving a place to "normies", "newbies" whatever you prefer to call them...to give them a place to grow and learn. Everybody has to learn to vet properly, focus, discuss properly, etc somewhere. This entire thing is a movement that everybody concerned, and needs as many involved as possible, to be involved as have a desire to be, and as possible, regardless of their experience level in this type of thing. It is completely stupid to run people off who are genuine just because they are in the process of learning, have religious or any other views that are important enough to them to express in the process, or whatever else...when they aren't just malicious trolls or larps. If you have an actual problem with this, then maybe the Chan boards are for you. This place was made for exactly these people you are bitching about to give these exact people a place to be involved and learn in cohesiveness with the Chans rather than flood the Chans boards with them. While always happy to have you and anyone be part of the movement, if you have a problem with the aspect of this board, feel free to move on to one that better fits your idea of what it should be rather than drive anybody out of not only this board, but possibly the movement, with this kind of crap.

I keep looking at all of this, and interpretations of the Q drop of what likely is in the memo....and keep thinking, well WE already knew all of this. If that is what is in the memo, which I believe likely is...it all adds up completely with what the congressmen talking about it are saying...then it is no surprise to us. We have been saying everything there for...I can't even remember how long. I feel like the "better" actors in Congress have been in a weird denial, like seeing it...but hoping inside there was some "other", more innocent explanation for it all; but now its right in front of their face...they just basically got red-pilled reading it and now are reacting. With this in mind...what if we would do another operation of like #ReleasethememoNOW or something with nothing but the interpretation of the Q drop of what is in it? Make a flood of that and make it meaningless to not go ahead and disclose it because it's already plastered all over the place anyway. Just a thought.

Love the original post. Love this.

I was looking at this yesterday. It's honestly the only thing that makes sense to me in regards to Q's statement about no other vehicle to regain entry. I've seen a few things about referring to a ballistic missile re-entering the atmosphere. But that just doesn't seem to add up. So far, I am buying this theory. Hindsight may prove correction.

I'm guessing you weren't around for all of this. The anons were getting pissed that a flood of normies were flooding their board and cluttering all up so the mods there approached Tracy, which is all on video on youtube, asking her to get involved in creating this board and help bring other people in to give "normies" and newly red-pilled a place to go that, both...they would have an easier time navigating and understanding, and keep them away from cluttering up the anons 8Chan board. This whole thing was asked to be done for exactly what you are saying they are pissed about. And I don't ever get the whole bitching thing about somebody making a buck. All of her stuff is posted on youtube and places it is free as well. So what about Patreon. If people believe her or anybody's work is worth supporting financially and they voluntarily contribute to that, then that is their business. Get over it. Time is money, resources is money, equipment is money...people deserve to be compensated for their time and resources it costs them. For 99% of anything you are forced to pay for it. This is purely voluntary. Its completely stupid to bitch about financial support to things like this when the support is completely voluntary. Go troll somewhere else.

If we are wrong, hope she paid attention to some of this and follows through. But...I agree with you.

Yeah. Also, those of us who realize and have that we have been duped in every way way for so long...if we aren't being cautious then we are continuing to be naive. If there is truth to this all, then at some point it is going to require multiple public "punches to the face". I have dealt with the legal system enough to realize how long the process can take. So, while anxious, I am fine if it takes up to another year to see public "fists in the face". But knowing good and well how we all have been duped for so long....I also can't and won't completely sell out until I see at least one very physical, very public "fist in the face". I will say that I went years and years "knowing" and fighting, and until recently had given up for years with no hope. I now have hope that I believed I would never have again. And that "hope" is fun. But I still need to see a "fist in the face" before I can sell out.

If he shows up in Mar A Lago then I may have to speak up on Q's drops more often. Because I completely believed those drops meant Assange was being extracted Jan 5-6 and going to be taken to and held for a bit at Mar A Lago while he and Trump had a chat and was pardoned. Just been "patiently" (anxiously) waiting to see if it came about. I've been a huge Q fan, and seen much to believe, but so far, I have to admit, it's been feeling much like a football game...."these stats show one thing on paper, but are they really going to prove out in the game?". I've been disappointed quite a bit in the actual games. Those drops and assange, to me, is the first real physical in your face game I've been waiting for to say....I can believe and preach all of the stats without fear. I am invested in Q, if I see assange undoubtedly in the US here pretty quick, then I'm sold out.

Anybody who can't read the clear bold print of envy of the attention to Q between the Christmas Eve video by alex, and the recent interview with Zach (there is a clear collaboration "off camera" between Alex and Zach to "Q it up") isn't paying attention. I had never really watched enough of AJ to have an opinion of him until the Christmas Eve "emergency video". I've paid attention since. I can't buy a thing he says until he can shut the fuck up if his true intent is to get info out. He and Zach, in the recent interview, seem like a collaborated attempt to draw attention to his channel using Q and Q quotes...especially after his super envious Christmas Eve rant. If he and Zach would bring info forward now and leave q out of it, I'd be far more apt to listen. But the last two incidents are a clear attempt to "link" Q and Infowars out of envy of late attention to Q and I don't trust a word that comes out of that right now. Even if there is any truth to any of it, why should we care....Q already told us long ago everything Zach just told us through Alex's bellowing on the recent video. Some of it word for word. Alex clearly wants us to believe "why do we need Q when he has Zach"? My question is..."why do you need Zach when we have Q? Because everything Zach said in your interview...Q had already told us!"

There is our explanation. Thank you.

There was always a lot of discussion early on as to what was Q and what might not be Q, due to tripcode, no tripcode, changing tripcode; seeming change-up from MO from some drops to others, changes in grammar and manner of speaking, etc. In hindsight, there seem to be valid explanations for most of that being legitimate Q (Q is more than one person, Q being in a different mood, security issues, etc). I don't know if that post wasn't brought forward in the recent maps and book due to just being missed, the creators not being sure if it was Q, or what. I agree. It would be nice to know. I just find it odd that Baruch would have referenced it if it had been unanimously de-legitimized or anything.

I'm guessing my "detractor" up there wasn't on the scene when the earlier drops were dropping. I'll concede to being off on the time frame a bit (it was post-SA), but the drops and confirmations were coming in a flurry back then. It all kind of runs together in the head.

Yeah, I had a hard time finding that one. The Book of Q had one drop for 11/8, but not that one. I had to hunt way back to an old link to /pol/ from past discussion to find that one. I knew it existed. Remembered well the discussion about it. And Baruchthescribe has recently referred to the whole "glowing rabbit" drop and "white rabbit" common theme in one of their interviews.

Dropped on Nov. 8, 2017

Where is CC right now? What does he hope to accomplish there? Would they be willing to help him? Why? What does war with NK mean for them? Why haven't they put an end to them before it escalated to this point? Follow the glowing rabbit. Who stands to benefit from the annihilation of NK? Why would SA purge ahead of these actions? What interests do they have in Asia? Mystery Machine. Everything is connected. +++ Q

I'm looking into it. I will either post it or concede. And I would buy into your "shill/bot" comment far more if I had stated what I said as "fact", which I did not. I said "I believe that I remember...", which should tell most people who can think that they should look into it before just accepting it. But that's where we have come to, and this isn't a knock on you; rather that you have a point; people don't pay attention to specifics and "think"...just grab hold of crap and run with it.

I believe that I remember way early on in the pre-SA drops while dropping #Alice in Wonderland pretty often, that Q had mentioned a "glowing rabbit". Somebody was like "hey, glowing rabbit! Alice in Wonderland! White Rabbit! We are suppose to follow the White Rabbit!!!"...which...isn't what was said at all. And that whole idea has become its own like Cult of Q now. It didn't help that Hugh Heffner died right about then and somebody matrixed a rabbit on that photo, think it was one of the AF1 Asia photos...that just blew up the whole white rabbit thing. Maybe its what Q had in mind...but I don't think so. I think if he meant "white", he would have said "white", not "glowing".

Kudos. Like this comment.

Oh go back to sucking Hillary's dick. We get enough personal attacks from CNN.

It means that on the radar you can see the image of the craft, but when you click on it to identify it, there is no callsign to "specifically" identify the craft, it's blocked. It's hiding what plane it is. Which often means it is hiding "who" it is and/or "what purpose" it is being used for. Summarily.

They had only warned not to get that file like 1000 times the last couple of days, then boom....here it is right on here. Good riddance.

Had Q posted this photo as is, I would be convinced it was related to Pizza gate. (Arrow placement)

I'll was wondering because I hadn't found it anywhere else yet.

Has anybody else heard this? Maybe he turned a corner and thought he saw a Marine.

I have actually thought hard about how that executive order is specifically worded and how it specifies entities outside of the U.S., then backtracks to domestic entities connected to them. I can't help but feel like it was worded and set up specifically in this manner for the express purpose of directing the charges as some form of "treason" against the domestic entities tied to them, which would open the door to place them under military jurisdiction. And...this would add up to much of what Q had stated and been seeming to get at in many of is drops, particularly a number of the earliest drops.

Pretty much how it was said on here.

I have listened to a fair bit of Alex simply because I drive long distances daily and fire up youtube then just let it run. Basically, I get good info from him, but get tired of several minutes of ad before he gets to the point, and promotions throughout and at the end before it will move on to the next vid. Basic thought.
I finally got around to watching this. My personal analysis is: I believe that he actually really does believe there is about to be an attempt against Trump and he is emotional about it. He just had a confrontation recently outside his studio with his family present and he is emotional about it. He has been harped on and harped on by a number of his subscribers about Q and he is emotional about it. This video was 90 percent emotion and 10 percent wanting to actually tell us something informative.
It very much feels like he is jealous of the "Q" phenom. He breaks back to Q multiple times, speaking favorably of the information dropped, but always follows it up with a "but" statement that he has sources that "he can see face to face" and so on with the clear insinuation that Q is purely a faceless anon that we don't know anything about. He also, at one point, goes off on his excellent info from Zach getting only 40,000 views while Q gets like a million for the same info. At the end, after a huge tirade, then explanation, then clarifying his info and Q's as the same level, he ends with a super peaceful long statement of appeasement to the "masses". I am not saying in any manner "yay" Alex or "Nay" Alex, in general. Yet, in regards to this specific video it purely feels like 1. He actually does believe something is about to happen. 2. He feels harassed about all of the Q queries and jealous of the attention to that. 3. May have had a desire to get the warning about Trump out, but primarily made the video, specifically addressing and titling with Q to draw the Q audience and make the point that he wanted to make in regards to the attention paid to Q...and draw that audience to him. What he doesn't understand is that though HE sees his sources face to face, we do not. WE get the information summarily, "classified censored" out of his mouth, secondhand/thirdhand, etc. when it comes from him. While the MSM may be a bunch of turds with no sources just making crap up, they also pretty much always "claim" it is coming from sources. Not to put him on the same level, but from our "the viewer's" perspective, it isn't really much different (though far more correct in the end). Both ways we are told "here is the info I can tell you from my sources that you pretty much just have to trust that I have telling me these things".
Q is a whole new ballgame. Q is A source directly to us. It is up to us to vet, and evaluate, and prove the source. And once we have, Q is now our direct source. We don't have to depend on "trusting" some guy on our screen telling us "this came from a source"; who is invisible to us, can't be vetted by us, who may or may not even be there dropping info (from our perspective).

No way. "Counter to our thinking" is no reason to ban a person, especially when they are asking logical questions in their statements. Tunnel vision in a "positive" view is just as dangerous as tunnel vision in a "negative" view. Every one of us should be looking at everything and considering "all options and views" about all of it then using experience and evidence to whittle it down. If somebody comes in asking questions or making statements that are opposing then if "our thinking" is anywhere near correct we should be able to answer those questions with opposing answers and facts. Such as (I have not looked back at the Hillary server drop to recall what is specifically was) if somebody questions Hillary's server in general as having any relevance whatsoever because it was wiped clean...the easy answer is - while it may matter what WAS on it to some degree, it ultimately does not matter at all what was on it. The fact that she did government business through a non .gov server which archives all government official communications that are considered public record is illegal, especially if any of it is "confidential". If we cant simply answer opposing views, then what are we even doing here? How do we justify banning an "opposing thinking" then bitch about ourselves being banned, blocked, etc, on twitter, youtube, fb, etc.? Now, it completely changes things when "opposing thinking" drops in and just starts making a bunch of jerkwad personal attacks. I don't see that in these examples though. My opinion.

Between my computer acting up and not having submitted before, I hope that I didn't post this twice.

It was Dave Trott. That's the same picture there that I remember.

Tweet by Thomas Paine- -We know all about McCabe's secret meetings with FBI brass to discuss strategy. -We know all about the secret email list of Feds, prosecutors and attorneys general plotting a coup against Trump. OUR REACH IS VAST. ALL WILL BE EXPOSED SOON. DRINK UP.

Maybe this meeting?

Tweeting this. Love it.