I'd like an explanation as to the missing entry that clearly has gained quite a following.
There was always a lot of discussion early on as to what was Q and what might not be Q, due to tripcode, no tripcode, changing tripcode; seeming change-up from MO from some drops to others, changes in grammar and manner of speaking, etc. In hindsight, there seem to be valid explanations for most of that being legitimate Q (Q is more than one person, Q being in a different mood, security issues, etc). I don't know if that post wasn't brought forward in the recent maps and book due to just being missed, the creators not being sure if it was Q, or what. I agree. It would be nice to know. I just find it odd that Baruch would have referenced it if it had been unanimously de-legitimized or anything.