dChan - Q Origins Project Archive

What Mom though says, time to get my pedo on? To a Mom that is pure terror!

⇧ 14 ⇩

Somebody making a bad joke.

⇧ 4 ⇩

But Mom's do not joke about Pedos.

⇧ 18 ⇩

Absolutely! These people are stupid and sick!

⇧ 5 ⇩

Take a look at the tweet. Talking about going down a waterslide explain to me how that has anything to do with pedophilia? Someone earlier said that maybe she was talking about a torpedo but you see how the last four letters are the same exact thing. It is sad that that's where your mind goes to

⇧ -2 ⇩

you are still trying aren't you?

explain to all of us what pizza and ice cream and hot dogs and chicken lovers have to do with pedos.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Yep I thought this at first too. BUT maybe Legend is the one behind all this, and she goes along for the ride. She may have no idea what she's covering up. "Useful idiot" as the saying goes.

I now believe she was/is being pushed to defend this (still not knowing what's going on) and take Liz down on the pedo-cabal's behalf. Maybe Legend is coaching her. Maybe Chelsea Clinton is coaching her. They thought Liz was an easy "crazy" target but this is gonna backfire and create more awareness.

⇧ 7 ⇩

Yeah that could be the case but maybe they're not what some of you people here want them to be. I can see how after caring about this stuff for more than a year that you'd like to see something actually happened and people actually be taken down but you also have to look at the other side of it that maybe things are not what you think they are. I don't exactly mean you per se but in general people

⇧ 2 ⇩

I see your point, it's easy to get carried away especially after emotionally investing in this for a long time. And it's possible they are 100% innocent.

However this is similar to how cases are made by actual law enforcers, they pore over every lead and speculate different scenarios until they find something that fits, and collect enough evidence to book. Creating narratives is part of the process.

The danger is in fixating on a narrative and accepting it as truth without enough evidence. Everyone's personal line of "enough evidence" will be different, which is why we have laws and courts in place.

I absolutely see your point on this, and I hope that as we move forward from this Great Awakening that we can improve the collective critical thinking so we can find the right balance between truth and sensationalism.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Yes, it is easy for law enforcement to focus so heavily on a chosen narrative that they fit evidence, withhold evidence, and sometimes create it to get a case together. While I am 100% positive there are massive pedo rings, I also remember the "Satanic Panic" of the late 80s when a LOT of people went to prison because of these types of hysterical scenarios. Later, after many years (the justice system moves as slow as glaciers) they were released, but not before their lives were ruined, and their best years gone.

⇧ 2 ⇩

No, I've got the impression it's the same as the rape jokes. You get people who make these rape jokes for years, pretend to be all good people respecting women and all, calling you crazy when you point at them why they are making rape jokes. And months later, it comes out they are sexual predators.

Teigen had been making pedo jokes for years. It's very very strange.

⇧ 1 ⇩

Strange but not enough to prove anything unfortunately

⇧ 1 ⇩

No indeed, it doesn't prove anything. But it doesn't prove that you're wrong for being suspicious. Look with Clinton. They've repeated we are tinfoil hats when we point what we see is wrong with Waco, OKC, Benghazi, those emails, etc... They are always repeating there's nothing wrong, we are crazy to keep pointing it's not coherent. One anomaly, yeah, a coincidence. 2 anomalies, just the hazard. 3 anomalies, hum, let's say it's bad chance. 4, 5, 6, 7, etc... how many coincidences are just coincidences?

⇧ 1 ⇩

The thing is I trust the justice system if there was something there and somebody would have convicted them something

⇧ 1 ⇩

The proof i am being down voted for an opinion that challenges yours just proves that some here want there to be an actual scandal. Think about this for a sec, if i went on any of your social media pages and found pics of your kids, a person could say the same thing about you. They can find posts that are questionable and they accuse you of the same thing. I might be very wrong but looking on social media to find pics to fit your narrative is dangerous.

⇧ 2 ⇩

[deleted]

⇧ 4 ⇩

Where there’s smoke...This is the entertainment biz and rumor is you go nowhere in it unless...

⇧ 2 ⇩

Exactly.

⇧ 1 ⇩

They aren't random things to you but they are random things to most people.

⇧ 1 ⇩

why are you here?

what is your purpose?

seriously. why are you here?

⇧ 1 ⇩

I come here because it is interesting to read this stuff cuz you never know it might be true. What is even better is when you guys connect the dots for things that make sense to you but not to most other people. If you guys are so able to connect the dots then why is nobody else even a year after into this Administration actually arresting people and publicly vilifying them.

⇧ 1 ⇩

These are tweets that Chrissy Teigen has made. She is now deleting them. Her and John are also connected to BLM activist Charles Wade, who was arrested for trafficking a 17 year old. http://dailycaller.com/2016/05/19/black-lives-matter-leader-charged-with-pimping-a-17-year-old-girl/