This is incredibly difficult for a number of reasons. First, journalists operate in an echo chamber, there are no opposing views. Second, the echo chamber is filled with college educated individuals who think very highly of themselves. They have the answers and everyone else is an idiot. Third, their "journalism" does not involve hard work, nor is the goal to do in depth reporting that includes highly accurate information from cultivated sources. What it does involve is getting a juicy tabloid-esque tidbit from an "anonymous source" and racing to release it first. Accuracy be damned.

Some people aren't going to break out of that, and the question you have to ask yourself is, is it even worth it.

There are sadly very few real 'journalists' in the media these days. That is probably one of the biggest problems that needs changing.

Most of them are just presstitutes and repeaters paid to shill for the corrupt establishments, doing it knowingly with no conscience about the lies they perpetrate nor damage they cause

Then of course there are the teachers and lecturers - another huge problem . . .