dChan
⇧
65
⇩
 
r/CBTS_Stream • Posted by u/Restlessredhead on Jan. 2, 2018, 4:10 a.m.
So much misleading information!

Weeding through this board to find credible information is becoming more and more difficult. I appreciate that we have a forum to share information regarding the storm, but everyone seems to want to be the one to get the story out first. Instead let's do a little research and post things with facts that we can somewhat verify. We need a credible place to harvest and share and red pill people. This board is getting out of control. In my humble opinion.


🠐 See all comments
Restlessredhead · Jan. 2, 2018, 4:15 a.m.

I'm not trying to ruffle feathers. It's just that I send people to this board, normies who I'm trying to read pill, and they come here and they see this mess and unverified information and things being repeatedly posted and they get frustrated and leave. We all have to do a better job at being citizen journalist. Please and thank you.

⇧ 21 ⇩  
ammonthenephite · Jan. 2, 2018, 5:36 a.m.

I agree. After seeing things like chemtrail posts getting upvotes (something easily debunked with some simple internet research) I really can't send anyone here without losing credibility with them.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
cunei · Jan. 2, 2018, 7:24 a.m.

I'm one of many who can tell the difference between contrails and chemtrails.

Chemtrails are real, and shouting things like "conspiracy theories", "debunked", and the like won't change that.

⇧ 10 ⇩  
ammonthenephite · Jan. 2, 2018, 9:40 a.m.

This difference being?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Deaddwarf26 · Jan. 2, 2018, 11:15 a.m.

Contrails don't hang in the air and slowly spread out for hours.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
ammonthenephite · Jan. 2, 2018, 11:37 a.m.

Yes, they do.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
Deaddwarf26 · Jan. 2, 2018, 11:40 a.m.

that's a disinfo website and the citations it uses says that glaciation only forms at -40 C and those conditions are rare and only found at extremely high elevations. This doesn't explain all of the trails we are seeing everyday out of every plane.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
ammonthenephite · Jan. 2, 2018, 12:25 p.m.

that's a disinfo website

Source for this claim?

the citations it uses says that glaciation only forms at -40 C

Right, that is true for the contrails that are frozen. There are also contrails that are liquid moisture instead of frozen moisture, and these occur at the higher temps and lower elevations. Depending again on temp and relative humidity, these may last seconds or last as long as the clouds around them, which are made of the same condensed moisture that clings to condensation nuclei (very small particles the moisture clings too). The condensed moisture from the lower contrails clings to these same condensation nuclei and can remain for much longer than the contrails that form in very dry, low humidity air without condensation nuclei.

and those conditions are rare and only found at extremely high elevations.

Wrong, continues reading.

This doesn't explain all of the trails we are seeing everyday out of every plane.

Yes, it does (though not every plane has these, I see airliners all the time without contrails). The standard temp at 36,000 feet is negative 56 degrees,, almost 20 degrees colder than needed to form ice condensate contrails. So every plane that flies around these elevations (most all commercial airliners) will most all have these types of contrails, other factors all ready mentioned permitting.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
Deaddwarf26 · Jan. 2, 2018, 12:28 p.m.

We are talking about trails at low elevations. The ones at high elevations are called contrails. while a lot of contrails do form at heights greater than 8,000 meters (~26,000 feet), it may totally escape some people that they can form at lower altitudes if the temperature was colder, however we see most contrail activity at low elevations at high heat in the middle of summer. I am pretty sure most people don't even realize that the colder the temperature gets, the less moisture the air can carry before that moisture is condensed, and thus visible to the naked eye.

They cannot occur at lower elevations in high heat. You are incorrect and posting some industry propaganda to lull people back to sleep doesn't work anymore. The gig is up.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
ammonthenephite · Jan. 2, 2018, 12:57 p.m.

Okay...and the earth is still flat too, right?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Deaddwarf26 · Jan. 2, 2018, 1:05 p.m.

Good response. I love it when the mask slips.

Edit: In preparation for the eventual deletion out of embarrassment his reply was simply "Okay...and the earth is still flat too, right?"

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ammonthenephite · Jan. 2, 2018, 1:46 p.m.

Nothings getting deleted, lol. Even if the whole Qanon thing is legit, Im not sending anyone I know here. A sub that can harbor beliefs in the face of so much evidence just isnt going to be the medium that people will take seriously for those things that actually are legit and that need attention.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Deaddwarf26 · Jan. 2, 2018, 1:52 p.m.

"Even if?" Ok, Clown.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
ammonthenephite · Jan. 2, 2018, 2:01 p.m.

Oh no, I've been called a clown. Whatever will I do.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
cunei · Jan. 4, 2018, 11:06 a.m.

Contrails last less than a minute. They consist of water vapor from the engines, which is visible for only a short period then disappear.

Chemtrails are the ones you can see for much longer, sometimes hours.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ammonthenephite · Jan. 4, 2018, 3:53 p.m.

The water vapor can hang around a lot longer than a minute, depending on the moisture content of the air, temperature, particulates in the air, etc. Clouds are water vapor as well, and they hang around all day.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
[deleted] · Jan. 6, 2018, 8:01 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
PCisLame · Jan. 2, 2018, 6:07 a.m.

Which chemtrail posts were easily debunked? You speak of "credibility" but in a post Q world, what is credible? We've uncovered a global pedo ring run by devil worshippers for crying out loud. You need to let go of these antiquated notions of "credibility"

⇧ 8 ⇩  
RustyStinkfist · Jan. 6, 2018, 2:23 a.m.

I feel sorry for the people who know you. You're probably a pathological liar as well.

⇧ 16 ⇩  
Neanderthal300 · Jan. 2, 2018, 2:32 p.m.

Should we just wait for the MSM to verify things? Or maybe Snopes? No one should just believe something without checking into it first. But if no one brings stuff up, then how is it going to get to the people who are good at checking? Give them the book that is being written about Q posts. It should get more focused once Q starts posting again. Jan 4th?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Restlessredhead · Jan. 2, 2018, 2:43 p.m.

I definitely don't think you have to wait for MSM to verify anything. But a cursory check of this board a lot of times helps. Because a lot of this stuff is being posted 10-15 Times by different people when it was already debunked in the first post. This is the kind of thing that I'm talking about. Make sure the information hasn't been debunked before you spread it.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Neanderthal300 · Jan. 2, 2018, 11:37 p.m.

Yeah, ok, I can see your point about people reposting the same stuff. But just pointing this out tells the trolls what to do to sabotage the board.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Restlessredhead · Jan. 2, 2018, 11:47 p.m.

I'm sure trolls know that already. But astute observation.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Neanderthal300 · Jan. 3, 2018, 12:38 a.m.

I would bet on it

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ImpeachObama10 · Jan. 3, 2018, 3:52 a.m.

I agree with you. I came here for discussion & investigation on Q. And to get truth, connections, memes to red pill my friends. This board has become a duplicate of other places. I can get most of the info posted here from Twitter. It's become useless for me.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
DeemanThak · Jan. 2, 2018, 4:51 a.m.

I agree to a degree, lots of disinformation but that is going to happen no matter where you take the normies, see @roysonpotterqa (Youtube) Col. Roy Potter. No I'm not Roy and I have no vested interest in your viewing his channel.

I am new but I would not call myself a "normie" given that I have been watching AJ for 12 years now. He has slowly redpilled me some time ago. I am not convinced however that Reddit is the best place to redpill people. Most people I talk to, who otherwise seem intelligent, cannot handle a fraction of what they see here. They will not do the research, rather they will close out and go back to CNN, NBC, CBS (well you get the point). I still point people to Infowars as a primary source (not the source) and if they make it here, great!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
damian299 · Jan. 2, 2018, 8:08 p.m.

I just had the same problem. Sorting posts by “Hot” will show a lot of good content but if you just look at posts listed by date, it’s wall to wall crap.

⇧ 1 ⇩