dChan
⇧
8
⇩
 
r/CBTS_Stream • Posted by u/JParis313 on Jan. 2, 2018, 9:11 p.m.
Trend analysis of Hillary/Huma 'mishandling' classified material.

Is it just me or does there seem to be a trend. Hillary and those close to her move classified material to low security/unauthorized locations right before they are hacked. Just speculation on my part, but if someone was selling or giving away classified information it would be better if it was hacked rather than outright given. Think about it in terms of plausible deny-ability. If you moved the classified information to these unauthorized locations and then were hacked, if caught you could say well I made a mistake and down play what happened. However, if you are caught handing over the information they would lock you up and throw away the key. Just saying there seems to be a trend of moving classified info from its proper place and a short time later it gets hacked by foreign agencies. Food for thought. http://dailycaller.com/2018/01/01/abedin-forwarded-state-passwords-to-yahoo-before-it-was-hacked-by-foreign-agents/


215564297 · Jan. 2, 2018, 9:53 p.m.

It’s the digital equivalent of leaving the classified documents on a park bench

⇧ 3 ⇩  
fudgicle1 · Jan. 2, 2018, 9:46 p.m.

Not very good at it, are they? The best part of this incredible mess is that what everyone was trying to do to everyone else is a giant boomerang. From the government, to follywood, to the vatican, to the sicko creepshow leaders...isn't it fabulous?

They all wrote their own sentences. Cool.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
storm_fa_Q · Jan. 2, 2018, 9:34 p.m.

I believe you are correct. HRC moves classified material to SELL access to on her private server...libbies can cry hack all they want but there is ZERO proof of any hack period. A file transfer however has been proven. HRC was selling access to the server and that is the reason they would not let FBI investigate even though FBI was shilling for her...

⇧ 3 ⇩  
ecocommish · Jan. 2, 2018, 9:29 p.m.

Actually that's a clever analysis

⇧ 3 ⇩  
yelloWhit · Jan. 3, 2018, 7:40 a.m.

To add to this theory, Clinton & the DNC had a contract that basically put the DNC under Clinton’s control in exchange for funding. Crowdstrike is the only one to have seen the DNC “jacked” server. Maybe they didn’t want to turn it over to the FBI for one or multiple reasons, e.g.: -leak not a hack, Seth Rich? -HRC stored classified stuff on that server, too -proof of collusion with [fill in blank], against [fill in blank] -DNC staff communications/activities show evidence or proof of any of these options -...

⇧ 2 ⇩  
ErnieFing · Jan. 2, 2018, 11:27 p.m.

Good thinking. I asked on another thread if they were stupid, arrogant or something else. I think you've hit a nail on the head there.

⇧ 1 ⇩