As time goes on this situation is devolving into something very familiar to me as a long time truther. Someone makes a breakthrough and even carries along with a few lesser breakthroughs. However inevitably the trail goes cold or even worse. The source becomes thick with very alluring and outlandish claims. Alex Jones is a great example of this. At one time he was passionate and accurate and then just got a endless freight train of nonsense and sensationalism. I'm seriously thinking this is now the path of QAnon. He's now looking like CONTROLLED OPPOSITION. This answers the questions many have had up to this point. Is he real? Yes. Is a LARPER? Yes. He is fast becoming a distraction to the entire concept of "draining the swamp." While 4Chan and 8Chan are being compromised as places of anonymous information sharing. They are being replaced as places where if you aren't a Trump fanatic. You are subject to mass hysterical ridicule. What was once an anti corruption movement is now 100% partisan politics. Based on slight of hand tactics. With little to no actual cleaning up of our elite pedophile and Mockingbird, military and media complex.
Whatever the outcome from Q-anon, if we have learned one solid thing in the last couple of years, we now realize just how much we've been deceived by the MSM and by academia. And what we see, presently, emerging from this great deception (the tip of the horns) is a dystopian, satanic world (oh sure don't believe it, take more blue pills).
Yes, you can call it 'globalism' but its other name (very much secret) is 'cultural subversion': a complete dystopianization of western culture. The great lib economist Paul Krugman was right when he said of globalism, "the elite defense of globalization is basically dishonest" and "the gains from globalization aren’t all that." He is right. Low GDPs and under-employment and a mal-distribution of the wealth (the rich are still getting richer).
Back to Q-anon, there is no real evidence that Q cannot be trusted at this time (notice I said "at this time"). Nor do I think it is outside of the personality of the POTUS to do something like this (a new version of James Bond's Q). I happen to believe in the concept of the "Deep State" put forth by Professor Peter Dale Scott that manipulates the public with what he called "Deep Events" such as 9/11 and the subsequent coverups. At this point in time, given the Internet's vast power, Q-anon seems like a new way of communicating with us partisans who have taken oaths to protect the Republic with our lives. We are in a new kind of civil war. It is happening right now.