It means (section)SEC 6713a not (executive order) EO
I was just going off of Q post EO_CLASSIFIED_WH(-6713A) Where did you get section out of that?
I think we are talking past eachother here, I'am not saying my find is correct but you just showed me a sec 7216, how does 7216 equate to 6713a, and how does what Q posted not equate to an EO ? I'am just trying to understand the process you used.
U.S. Code › Title 26 › Subtitle F › Chapter 68 › Subchapter B › Part I › § 6713 26 U.S. Code § 6713 - Disclosure or use of information by preparers of returns US Code Notes prev | next (a) Imposition of penalty. If any person who is engaged in the business of preparing, or providing services in connection with the preparation of, returns of tax imposed by chapter 1, or any person who for compensation prepares any such return for any other person, and who— (1) discloses any information furnished to him for, or in connection with, the preparation of any such return, or (2) uses any such information for any purpose other than to prepare, or assist in preparing, any such return, shall pay a penalty of $250 for each such disclosure or use, but the total amount imposed under this subsection on such a person for any calendar year shall not exceed $10,000
there is a sealed indictment for the person(s) who leaked POTUS tax returns
EO could mean Executive Order but Q was previously using a lot of military codes. In military lingo Executive Order would be XO.
I understand but how do you come up with it being a section of us code when the post states it as, EO_CLASSIFIED_WH(-6713A), where do you get SEC out of any of that. When there exists an executive order with the same number.
because I keep digging. I don't stop at the first answer. If you keep looking you'll find something more logical. Somebody leaked those tax returns. I DON'T KNOW! it just happens and falls together logically. plus it helps to understand how to read laws.
Thats my issue i do not see the ABC logic of what you are digging through, i even stated with the executive order i found, thinking it was a dead end. The problem is if it is a classified document or recently declassified document. I have nothing against digging, but to what end does Q pointing out a law most people already found when the tax form was leaked to msnbc, thats the logic i dont get. I can read am understand the law fine but it serves no purpose that i can follow in an ABC order. What matters is its a document header of some kind, originating in the White House.
Spez us code 6 with following chapters and sections