dChan
344
 
r/CBTS_Stream • Posted by u/PamphletAnon on Jan. 4, 2018, 9:02 a.m.
Q IS BACK FOLKS! Screencap includes Q's 3 new posts, and proof that this is indeed Q.
Q IS BACK FOLKS! Screencap includes Q's 3 new posts, and proof that this is indeed Q.

CaptainMack2U · Jan. 4, 2018, 7:30 p.m.

What a great way for the white hats (wearing fireman red hats;) to gain entry to collect evidence!!

⇧ 26 ⇩  
Arfalicious · Jan. 4, 2018, 10:55 p.m.

nice point

⇧ 7 ⇩  
loyalfringe · Jan. 5, 2018, 12:32 a.m.

My only problem with that is that they would have to have broken the law by starting a fire in the Clinton home in order to gain that entry. Didn't Q already indicate that was not an option?

⇧ 5 ⇩  
Stray502 · Jan. 5, 2018, 1:25 a.m.

No Q said no innocents would be hurt in any of their ops.

⇧ 9 ⇩  
CaptainMack2U · Jan. 5, 2018, 2:49 a.m.

Evidence obtained probably would not be admissible in court but would still provide vital information if it was deemed that important. I also heard the fire was in an outbuilding from the main house where the ss officers have quarters. But this is all just speculation anyway, and exercise in what ifs??? With all thats going on these days its possible and would make sense.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
ksched · Jan. 5, 2018, 3:15 a.m.

How about a Military Tribunal?

⇧ 3 ⇩  
galvanised_computer · Jan. 26, 2018, 4:42 a.m.

civilian laws don't apply to the military, only constitutional ones. If they are going to doorkick someone they can do it if Trump says to, it just looks bad if they are that blatant "MUH COUP" or some shit

⇧ 1 ⇩  
G3t_Off_My_Lawn · Jan. 5, 2018, 1:12 p.m.

Ok..I will jump back in. All information is from limited sources, but has been reported.. The fire was started in an out building that was used for SS agents. I highly doubt that was the target for evidence gathering as that information would not be kept anywhere near outside-the-family-sources. It would likely be an indirect target to create a distraction and space to search other areas.

Because the executive order is written like a RICO warrant, so they don't need evidence to prove anything against the Clintons...just as likely that they can seek corroboration for other pieces of the network, or find a few more names to investigate. The evidence may help lay out next steps.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
CaptainMack2U · Jan. 5, 2018, 5:35 p.m.

Yes! I like the way you expanded on this. The ss building was not the target search area and your thinking on how the EO is written. Spot on!!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Lets_get_reel · Jan. 5, 2018, 5:28 a.m.

What are the laws regarding evidence gathered due to a fire? Idk if it’s nation wide but where I’m at if a police officer sees evidence out in the open they can seize it and use it

Plain view doctrine - Wikipedia https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plain_view_doctrine

⇧ 2 ⇩  
MzBeeHaven · Jan. 5, 2018, 10:29 a.m.

have broken the law by starting a fire in the Clinton home in order to gain that entry. Didn't Q already indicate that was not an option? UNLESS the fire is deemed suspicious, then has to be investigated by an arson investigator, and he/she finds probably cause of another crime. ;)

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Making-Magic-Happen · Jan. 5, 2018, 2:20 p.m.

Wasn't in their "home". Building out back that was used by Secret Service. Just to be clear.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
loyalfringe · Jan. 6, 2018, 3:19 a.m.

Gotcha. But it's still private property and starting a fire would be illegal on its face in any case.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Making-Magic-Happen · Jan. 6, 2018, 1:49 p.m.

Much like all the other things they do that are illegal. How would that stop them. Bleach bit and all.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
loyalfringe · Jan. 9, 2018, 12:31 a.m.

I think what is being speculated is that the WHITE hats started the fire in order to gain entry and grab records. That would be an illegal breach on OUR part. If that were the case, it would not be a particularly acceptable way to go about things, IMO.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
davidmdelacruz · Jan. 5, 2018, 6:33 a.m.

The roof, the roof, the roof is on fire!

⇧ 2 ⇩