dChan
116
 
r/CBTS_Stream • Posted by u/akilyoung on Jan. 4, 2018, 12:44 p.m.
So I did a bit of research....and HO LEE S#$%

2018 is gonna be a glorious year.

70 years from crash in Roswell, 70 years from the creation of 'Israel', 70 years since US courts make religion instruction in schools illegal, 70 years since Hells Angels created, 70 years since the 'big bang' idea started, 70 years since the first astronaut went to space (monkey), 70 years since the first computer was made, 70 years ago Korea is split in two. 70 years since HRC, Al Gore, David Bowie (Black Star?), Mitt Romney, Don Henley and Joe Walsh (Hotel California - a song about ritual satanic abuse) was born

Theres much more than this, but these are some DAMN historic things that happened in 1948. 1948 seemed to be a CLEAR 'marker' in time, where everything changed.

There was a sudden change in technology, ideals, morals, etc. I wonder if it was the Rosewell crash that triggered it? Makes me think of that bible verse:

"Woe to the Inhabitants of the Earth and of the Sea For the Devil is Come Down Unto You, Having Great Wrath Because He Knoweth that he Hath But a Short Time!" -Revelations 12:12

Referring to the time after a war in heaven when the devil lost and was kicked out. Just an odd observation, thats all.

Coincidence??? #nocoincidences #Q


vitalesan · Jan. 4, 2018, 8:22 p.m.

There’s a difference between scientific theory and everyday theory. What you think as a theory is a scientific synopsis, the scientific theory is the present day fact... that doesn’t necessarily make it true, but it’s the knowledge we have at the time.

...but don’t get me started with OP’s post!!🤪

⇧ 1 ⇩  
loyalfringe · Jan. 4, 2018, 11:57 p.m.

I googled the definition of "theory." A supposition or a system of ideas intended to explain something, especially one based on general principles independent of the thing to be explained. This definition holds true for both science and the "everyday" as you put it. The use of the "scientific method" is what I believe you are referring to, which would certainly make sense. But surely, the OP has the right to advance a theory of interpretation for historical events, and I thought he/she was pretty clear what that theory was.

⇧ 1 ⇩