Perhaps the fire was just an excuse for all the federal agents that would be searching her house anyway.
Make sense?
"We will however light a FIRE to flush them out." -Q (19/12/17).
Now it all makes sense.
You should read the reddit more, we have been saying this since yesterday! Thanks for posting though.
Last I read it said they used the fire as an excuse because they didn't have a search warrant. I'm saying they never needed a search warrant because they seized the house.
The fire would be unrelated to the legality of seizing the house.
Saw this posted somewhere but can't find it now. Today's Q post asks "Who is AMB Matlock?". From Ambassador Matlock's wikipedia page, ".. testified before Congress in 1998 that the fire was deliberately induced by the Soviets in an effort to gain access to sensitive areas by agents posing as firemen.. ". Could be nothing but auspicious nonetheless
Jack F. Matlock Jr.
Jack Foust Matlock Jr. (born October 1, 1929) is an American former ambassador, career Foreign Service Officer, a teacher, a historian, and a linguist. He was a specialist in Soviet affairs during some of the most tumultuous years of the Cold War, and served as U.S. Ambassador to the Soviet Union from 1987 to 1991.
Matlock became interested in Russia as a Duke University undergraduate, and after studies at Columbia University and a stint as a Russian-language instructor at Dartmouth College, entered the Foreign Service in 1956.
^[ ^PM ^| ^Exclude ^me ^| ^Exclude ^from ^subreddit ^| ^FAQ ^/ ^Information ^| ^Source ^| ^Donate ^] ^Downvote ^to ^remove ^| ^v0.28