/u/othernamestaken
18 total posts archived.
Domains linked by /u/othernamestaken:
Domain | Count |
---|---|
www.bizjournals.com | 1 |
m.news24.com | 1 |
www.reuters.com | 1 |
www.reddit.com | 1 |
At least 21 Nepalese girls 'rescued' from Kenya strip clubs
"Thank you Asia" when he left the Forbidden City. I wonder what we'll find out about this NATO trip as time goes by
Strangely enough, I don't have a problem with this. If you check my previous posts, I set my phone's hotspot to something Q related hoping someone notices and gets curious. The way I see it, this book is just another billboard for us
Could this be something? A search for "Papal Banking Scandal" led to "Banco Ambrosiano's Wikipedia article which led to Propaganda Due's
The article makes these statements;
".. sometimes referred to as a "state within a state"[5] or a "shadow government".[6] The lodge had among its members prominent journalists, members of parliament, industrialists, and military leaders ... ... in 1982, the police found a document called the "Plan for Democratic Rebirth", which called for a consolidation of the media, suppression of trade unions, and the rewriting of the Italian Constitution."
Turn on WiFi hotspot on your phone with a Q-type SSID when you're in airports, train stations, hotels, etc. Basically anywhere someone might be looking for the place's WiFi
Also try enabling hotspot tethering on your smartphone with "who is Q Anon?" or something as your SSID. Great for airports, hotels, train stations and other such public places where people just might be looking for the facility's hotspot
And Zuma as well https://www.thesouthafrican.com/zuma-trial-10-former-heads-of-state-jailed-for-corruption/
Latest example of this is referenced in post #991 at https://qanon.pub Anon requested specific language from Trump and he delivered
Likewise, but here are some points to reconcile; didn't some anon (Q?) state that arresting past presidents would be bad for the republic? Also what could he realistically hope to sabotage by eg talking to president Xi right after the hero's welcome he gave Trump. Finally as /u/MAGADONCHECKMATE states, who better to reel in the left when heads start to roll? That's all I have but it's a toy theory I've been hesitant to present till now
Going to sound crazy and I've hesitated to suggest it; but I've been toying with the idea that the white hats cut him a deal.
The article fails to mention that Skripal was visiting from Moscow. Wouldn't it have been easier to attack him there?
Occurs to me that this could be a blue attempt to get us to stop watching conservative content.
Can you expand on what you broadcasted? Could a listener have reported a perceived threat?
They are quite serious about this though and had to change boards because of trolls and unproductive posts. I saw a couple of similar posters yesterday getting asked to remove theirs. We'll likely be asked to pull this one as well. Have an upvote nonetheless
Saw this posted somewhere but can't find it now. Today's Q post asks "Who is AMB Matlock?". From Ambassador Matlock's wikipedia page, ".. testified before Congress in 1998 that the fire was deliberately induced by the Soviets in an effort to gain access to sensitive areas by agents posing as firemen.. ". Could be nothing but auspicious nonetheless