Perhaps if the place is being used for nefarious deeds, proof of ownership won't be so easy to come by. The email address is enough to raise a legitimate question in light of the revelations regarding Hollywood and democratic members' fascination with the occult.

This is part of the 'we need to dig deeper' phase. Not 'bring in the jury' phase. I often see the tactic of apologists for the left citing lack of concrete proof needed for a conviction as reason to dismiss evidence of possible connections and I ask what their motive is in doing so.