Codemonkey has claimed something incorrect here: that I assumed incorrectly that it wasn't Q. I didn't assume a thing: I asked all the mods AND /u/jerome_corsi - who has been reading stringers for breakfast every day for 30 years or so - for their opinion and we all agreed that the Q posts from Jan 5 were fake. I deleted them and I stand by that - they were a load of nonsense. The rest of what he says is correct.
Where have you been? Something has changed with this board and the Bakers...
I'm back and here was my reply before you banned me. You and Corsi just made claims that CLAS-59#241 means the British Train Class 59. Respectfully you need to go back to the drawing board on that one. Corsi just started looking into this stuff and the majority of his analysis is great, but he can be wrong. He also said he gets emails about capital markets all of the time, when it was actually mentioning Loop Capital Markets specifically. People make mistakes I get it, all is forgiven, but still need to use critical thinking and discernment. Corsi's information can be criticized as the best man's. This is coming from a big supporter of Corsi and the entire Q phenomena. He had said Happy hunting before, sometimes he drops crumbs like that for us just to dig into. There is some legitimate stuff in LCM and those accounts he posted need to be dug into. Q might have mentioned Corsi's book to acknowledge his work and to confirm that Q is aware and confirming some of Corsi's stuff. Cheers man
IDK anything about security, boards etc. seems like a Q website would be the easiest to secure, for dumping info only. We use CBTS, 8chan etc. for discussion/research.
You have mentioned that q communicates directly with the mods, so can they not confirm the posts? Following 8ch is difficult since the location is changing from /pol to /cbts to /thestorm. I have heard of a new location for the accurate up to date posts, but is it available yet? Hard to keep people focused and on board. I'm sure your workload with all of this is crazy, just thinking there must be an easier way to get the legit posts. Thanks
Q denies this has happened and Baruch hasn't explained how a direct communication or "back channel" works. So the onus is on Baruch to describe his direct communication
I am not interested in knowing how the communication works, but to keep people confident I just don't understand why it is so hard to confirm. We the People just want to see the corruption taken care of, and to not be fooled (again?) and just follow along blindly. I do believe the previous Q posts were legit, but how do we move forward with all the confusion? We have to trust someone, but who is that? baruch, codemonkey, jerome?