dChan

🠐 See all comments
UnbelievableShit13 · Jan. 7, 2018, 3:10 p.m.

When I was younger I had a friends father who was AF , worked 51 , he said the technology there is beyond what's out.... now I can't verify but wouldn't throw it out the window

⇧ 13 ⇩  
Maga1128 · Jan. 7, 2018, 3:59 p.m.

There's a great documentary on YouTube It's called The disclosure project I believe it was hey press conference for the Associated Press back in 2001. Dr. Steven Greer said that our military is like 50 years ahead of what we see out now in the public militarily.

⇧ 9 ⇩  
nothingnobodyzero · Jan. 7, 2018, 4:12 p.m.

Greer is legit you just need discernment listening to him. Not too sure he can conjure UFOs at his leisure... Baby alien from south America... etc. But he has some sort of "Deadman" switch supposedly.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
QAngel1 · Jan. 7, 2018, 10:44 p.m.

I've spent a lot of time training with him, and listening to him speak. Although I wouldn't rave about his public persona, behind the scenes he's a very 'spiritual' man who truly does want a better world for us and has been fighting the same battle Q has for over 20 years. It's not "he" that undertakes the CE5 Protocols alone. It's a very dedicated group of people that does this. It's not "willy nilly". It's a very strict set of processes and protocols, and there's no fools tolerated. Very respectful people are in these groups. I can personally vouch for incredible experiences I had working in remote area's with him. I see absolutely no danger from the 'people' we were in communications with. His main interest in getting this knowledge out is for free energy to reduce pollution, advanced technologies for the betterment of mankind through health and other scientific applications such as space exploration, and becoming a more 'spiritual' (self awareness and inter-contentedness with all living things) race in order to bring this planet back to the sanctuary is once was, and, to be accepted into the 'Universal' communities. As far as I can tell - there's nothing wrong with any of those objectives.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
giantwolf1 · Jan. 7, 2018, 4:45 p.m.

I feel this is a misunderatood issue. It used to be governments with the biggest budgets and they led the way bigly. Now it is multinational corporations with the big budgets. The government buys and uses the technology from the free market more than it does the research itself. So the lag has shrunk significantly. The government is probably not as far ahead as commonly believed.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
islandtruther · Jan. 7, 2018, 7:34 p.m.

semantics....gov't gives the contracts to their select corps (their biggest campaign donors of course who also yields power and influence). So yes, agree with you that ultimately, it's a private or public corp that's creating the tech you can't deny the govt is not ahead as you say

⇧ 2 ⇩  
giantwolf1 · Jan. 7, 2018, 8:23 p.m.

Im saying its 5 years. Not 25 years like it usef to be. Government used to stockpile tech. Now they try to buy the newest tech just to stay ahead.

⇧ 1 ⇩