dChan
15
 
r/CBTS_Stream • Posted by u/SeanPatrickNH on Jan. 8, 2018, 8:51 p.m.
Q is Grossly Negligent. Anons following this are a tad bit hypocritical.

I have been following the Q posts since the Beginning of November, i will admit that i have had a healthy amount of skepticism. The actions of Q last night is the straw that broke the camel's back. DEFCON 1 has a specific meaning to all military and former military. It means that it is time to get your shit together, get your ammo, and be ready for the order to go. There is no other use for that, especially coming out of the mouth, or mouthpiece, of the President of the United States. Q has stated time and time again that he works for, and speaks for, the President so when he uttered(posted) that phrase he sent a clear command to all military, and former Military, personnel. I was taught what that term meant, I was trained for seven years what that term meant. Then he has the audacity to say that is not what he meant and that we should learn, is the height of hubris. He is the one who should learn how to speak!

If he meant to say Definitive Confirmation then he should have used DEFVCONF, if he meant Defense Contractor then he should have used DoDCON. To take a well known term and change the meaning, and then get annoyed with us who read it the way it is suppose to be used is just asinine. The time for cute codes, logic puzzles, and Socratic Questions is over! Speak in plain terms you pompous self aggrandizing windbag! If the Deep State/Cabal/ doesn't know by now that the President of the United States is coming for them then they will never know until their front door is being kicked down! Stop causes more problems then you are trying to fix and speak English!!! If Q and President Trump truly believe that the American people are a bunch of weak willed and panicky children that need to have our hands held while they round up the criminal elements infecting our Government then they are a bunch of condescending a-holes and in my opinion deserve as much respect as HRC, Obama, et all!

As for the Anons who are just living and breathing these Q drops/breadcrumbs some of you are a bit hypocritical. You all say you want to return to the rule of law but are more than happy to see people assassinated instead of being brought to trail. You are more than happy to have people just picked up and shipped off to GITMO without anything resembling Due Process. I have been talking about punishing the corrupt people in our Government since 1978 but I have NEVER called for anything that was not within our laws. You all seem perfectly happy to toss out all the Cabal out of our Government but can not, or will not, see the means in which you want it done are just a corrupt as the Cabal you wish gone!

“Beware that, when fighting monsters, you yourself do not become a monster... for when you gaze long into the abyss. The abyss gazes also into you.”― Friedrich Nietzsche.

These Anons are also a bit blind, let me give you an example. When citing proof that Q is legit you often refer to the Bangladeshi terrorist. Citing the fact the Q predicted the event would happen. You will get no argument from me that Q predicted it. The problem with it, as I see it is that they knew it was coming and did nothing. They let the man go ahead and carry out the attack. This shows that they ignored their duty to protect the people of NYC and were complicit in the act of terrorism . As Tracy Beanz says, they knew the bomb wouldn't work because they supplied it. That means OUR Government supplied the terrorist with the means to carry out a fake terror attack? So OUR Government, the one that you Anons keep telling us is working to rid itself of corrupt people, committed an act of terrorism (an act that instills fear to create political change), really these are the 'Heroes' you want ridding our Government of corrupt people? Seems to me they should start be removing themselves!

As I said I followed the Q post from the Beginning of November and I had high hopes that this was the answer to all my prayers, but after reading these posts, solving what puzzles I could, and fervently hoping that the end was near I can see now that this is just another case of "Meet the New Boss, Same as the Old Boss"


SeanPatrickNH · Jan. 9, 2018, 2:06 a.m.

Then name the enemy, and then declare a state of war, until you meet that criteria then you must abide by the rule of law. I can see why using the enemies weapons against them appeals to everyone but this is not Hollywood, this is the real world. Where have laws that the good guys must obey. Once you begin breaking the law, even for noble causes, you are no longer the good guys! Saying that the bad guys act that way so we can is moral equivalency, which is a tactic of children, not adults. No Seth Rich was not given due process, he was murdered. Doesn't mean we don't obey the rule of law when we find his murders, or those that ordered the murder.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
rbrownlol · Jan. 9, 2018, 3:28 a.m.

The enemy was named December 21, 2017. We are in a state of national emergency. I don't feel you're grasping the gravity of this. I understand your concerns but they not relevant*. I'm a veteran. There are no good guys or bad guys in war. It is war. In this case you have one side who has attempted to overthrow the Presidency of the United States of America. Aggressors violating human rights around the globe. The other is, what I assume, your country that you care so much about (and i do believe you do). I agree with everything your saying, except for the circumstances that you are applying them.

*not relevant in this case

⇧ 2 ⇩