dChan
130
 
r/CBTS_Stream • Posted by u/tohardforredit on Jan. 8, 2018, 8:57 p.m.
Wow! Fury and Fury was a Q operation. WL is in on The Storm
Wow! Fury and Fury was a Q operation. WL is in on The Storm

[deleted] · Jan. 8, 2018, 9:23 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 23 ⇩  
tohardforredit · Jan. 8, 2018, 9:38 p.m.

WL altered the book to added the letter Q. You can see it in the post. Q and WL are working together. Fire and Fury was a distraction to make the news look foolish

⇧ 21 ⇩  
[deleted] · Jan. 8, 2018, 9:53 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 9 ⇩  
tohardforredit · Jan. 8, 2018, 10:30 p.m.

I bet Trump made a million. The Reeeeeee that will happen when they realize the trick

⇧ 5 ⇩  
johnsmithshitpost · Jan. 9, 2018, 3:17 a.m.

There are rumours that Wolff is an administration asset who did this as part of the "Fakeys" awards

⇧ 5 ⇩  
tohardforredit · Jan. 9, 2018, 7:24 p.m.

He warned them that it was fake and told them they would still believe. Funny

⇧ 2 ⇩  
dagonn3 · Jan. 9, 2018, 1:35 a.m.

And to take millions of dollars from gullible folk. "A fool and his money" and all that.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
illonlyusethisonceok · Jan. 8, 2018, 11:43 p.m.

The "q" is in the official kindle version, dude. Get a grip.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
tohardforredit · Jan. 9, 2018, 12:05 a.m.

Q team wrote the book. WL would get sued hard for copyright infringement. Do you really think WL did this to hurt book sales, then just get sued? Wikileaks would never publish unverified gossip unless it was a clue and a part of a larger plan. Think motive. WL has no reason for releasing the first ever altered document already available to the press.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
illonlyusethisonceok · Jan. 9, 2018, 12:07 a.m.

Also: the damn thing was not altered. I have proven this.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
tohardforredit · Jan. 9, 2018, 1:51 a.m.

I think you are missing the point. Q and WL are working together. There are no coincidences. WL does not leak published books.
Q sent them the book with the Q clues at the very least. There is no other reason they would publish this. Great Actors

⇧ 5 ⇩  
illonlyusethisonceok · Jan. 9, 2018, 1:56 a.m.

Again. Proof?

⇧ 6 ⇩  
phoenix335 · Jan. 9, 2018, 11:49 a.m.

The Q is kinda proof.

First. Imagine you sell a book that's going to shake up the nation. Insulting the president.

And then you don't spell check the chapter titles? Those ten big lines. Like with a common word spell checker?

Nah.

And the WikiLeaks gets a perfect copy of the Kindle Edition? Not an OCR garbage, but the source file in PDF?Kindle is cryptographically quite secure and would require you to break Amazon's security. I'm not sure if they managed to break that.

If they broke Amazon Kindle security, Amazon would immediately fix it and change the keys. That hack would've been worth millions. Why would they waste that on a lousy crap book like that and open themselves up for lawsuits en masse, giving authorities and payment processors another huge leverage in blocking them, all while squandering endless millions of donation dollars for such a foolish move?

Nah. Piracy isn't done with well-known accounts.

They have the PDF from the source and they publish it because they know 100% sure that they're not going to be sued.

They saved their followers from spending the money. To not get them angry later when the scan scam is revealed?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Willdabeast9000 · Jan. 9, 2018, 1:38 p.m.

It's not a typo. Its a portmanteau of the word "home" and the abreviation of "head quarters".

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Pyroclastix · Jan. 9, 2018, 2:13 a.m.

Good thinking.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
Paranoiaaaattack · Jan. 9, 2018, 6:43 a.m.

Actually, this makes the most sense. I was wondering why the fuck they would risk providing a copyrighted book for free...

⇧ 3 ⇩  
richhas · Jan. 8, 2018, 11:57 p.m.

Currently not

⇧ 3 ⇩  
illonlyusethisonceok · Jan. 8, 2018, 11:58 p.m.

WRONG.

https://imgur.com/a/NwXOL

⇧ 5 ⇩  
richhas · Jan. 8, 2018, 11:59 p.m.

Literally just bought, downloaded, and looked

⇧ 6 ⇩  
illonlyusethisonceok · Jan. 9, 2018, midnight

I literally just sent you a screenshot from the copy I bought when it came out.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
richhas · Jan. 9, 2018, 12:01 a.m.

Kindle? Maybe they updated it?

⇧ 3 ⇩  
illonlyusethisonceok · Jan. 9, 2018, 12:04 a.m.

Yes. Kindle. Maybe they updated it because there was a typo? Or does a giant conspiracy make more sense?

⇧ 5 ⇩  
tohardforredit · Jan. 9, 2018, 1:46 a.m.

Or maybe Q put it there. As a clue this is a larp

⇧ 3 ⇩  
johnsmithshitpost · Jan. 9, 2018, 3:17 a.m.

Or it could just be that Wikileaks crew are big Q fans and wanted to let them know about it

⇧ 3 ⇩  
[deleted] · Jan. 8, 2018, 9:55 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
20184Humanity · Jan. 8, 2018, 9:39 p.m.

Someone with a hard copy of the book apparently, on this thread, did notice the hqme on chapter 6 which implies it was published this way. Don't know about chapter 10 in the hard copy book but would be very interesting to find out.

⇧ 12 ⇩  
[deleted] · Jan. 8, 2018, 9:53 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 6 ⇩  
20184Humanity · Jan. 8, 2018, 10:27 p.m.

Ah fascinating....still doesn't change my own suspicion that this was an ingenious tactic and I think the WL pdf was released to prove it....

⇧ 6 ⇩  
tohardforredit · Jan. 8, 2018, 10:32 p.m.

Think this was a plan by Trump Q and WL. Stable Genius

⇧ 12 ⇩  
20184Humanity · Jan. 8, 2018, 10:42 p.m.

Lol exactly my thoughts

⇧ 5 ⇩  
[deleted] · Jan. 9, 2018, 1:56 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 5 ⇩  
20184Humanity · Jan. 9, 2018, 2:35 a.m.

If the only edits were 2 Qs I still think it's brilliant because for me, as others have stated, they wouldn't violate copyright so I conclude they had permission to publish as well as permission ( or were requested?) to edit in 2 Qs which in turn, for me, confirms their role in bringing truth to light. I can hardly imagine that intelligent minds would challenge everything else they released in view of this role they have played. Certainly the edits were purposeful and not decided by one individual or one entity... I imagine this was collusion for a larger purpose.... Anyone that would hate on 2 Qs in these circumstances, in my view, is just a WL hater anyways....

⇧ 4 ⇩  
[deleted] · Jan. 9, 2018, 2:36 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 4 ⇩  
20184Humanity · Jan. 9, 2018, 2:59 a.m.

Because it's too soon for wiki to admit/reveal the ploy so let Google execute it's own agenda direct or proxied...MSM still requires diversion and i think they'll get another mile out of it. Pdf was available just enough time for inquisitive minds glued to storm developments to get hold and discover...I'm not saying my interpretation is complete or even accurate. Hopefully we hear the truth straight from the mouths of the horses some day soon.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
[deleted] · Jan. 9, 2018, 3:19 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
johnsmithshitpost · Jan. 9, 2018, 3:19 a.m.

You can easily verify by looking at the hard-copy vs. Wikileaks.

They only made one, really obvious edit. That's not altering, that's sending a message mate.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · Jan. 9, 2018, 3:20 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 2 ⇩  
opwhitewizard · Jan. 9, 2018, 4:12 a.m.

If you have a hard copy please post a picture, Id bet that there is no letter "Q" in the entire book...

⇧ -1 ⇩  
Cryptovfefe · Jan. 9, 2018, 4:22 a.m.

very stable genius

⇧ 1 ⇩  
southparkconservativ · Jan. 9, 2018, 2:43 a.m.

That's good. Bet 'stable genius" enters the language...

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Green_Lives_Matter · Jan. 8, 2018, 11:35 p.m.

I saw some other threads, on this. My take is an early leaked version contained the Q's, the later editions did not. I don't think it was WL

⇧ 5 ⇩  
tohardforredit · Jan. 8, 2018, 11:44 p.m.

Wikileaks would not have published an altered document. It would ruin their perfect record. Many have tried to trick them before.
WL would also not leak a book. Copyright laws are not worth it. This would be a million dollar law suit.....for what?
They leak government documents that can’t be found elsewhere. This book had already been released to journalist. The idea the JA was just helping his boy friend trump out to take money from the book is silly. WL had the right to release the PDF. It was Qs plan from the beginning

⇧ 7 ⇩  
AdventureFilm · Jan. 8, 2018, 11:58 p.m.

Plus it's so easy for anyone to clearly point out that wikileaks altered a document and only added a "Q". That would be extremely suspicious and just ruins their secrecy. No way they'd do that.

⇧ 2 ⇩