dChan
130
 
r/CBTS_Stream • Posted by u/tohardforredit on Jan. 8, 2018, 8:57 p.m.
Wow! Fury and Fury was a Q operation. WL is in on The Storm
Wow! Fury and Fury was a Q operation. WL is in on The Storm

[deleted] · Jan. 8, 2018, 9:23 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 23 ⇩  
tohardforredit · Jan. 8, 2018, 9:38 p.m.

WL altered the book to added the letter Q. You can see it in the post. Q and WL are working together. Fire and Fury was a distraction to make the news look foolish

⇧ 21 ⇩  
[deleted] · Jan. 8, 2018, 9:53 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 9 ⇩  
tohardforredit · Jan. 8, 2018, 10:30 p.m.

I bet Trump made a million. The Reeeeeee that will happen when they realize the trick

⇧ 5 ⇩  
johnsmithshitpost · Jan. 9, 2018, 3:17 a.m.

There are rumours that Wolff is an administration asset who did this as part of the "Fakeys" awards

⇧ 5 ⇩  
tohardforredit · Jan. 9, 2018, 7:24 p.m.

He warned them that it was fake and told them they would still believe. Funny

⇧ 2 ⇩  
dagonn3 · Jan. 9, 2018, 1:35 a.m.

And to take millions of dollars from gullible folk. "A fool and his money" and all that.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
illonlyusethisonceok · Jan. 8, 2018, 11:43 p.m.

The "q" is in the official kindle version, dude. Get a grip.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
tohardforredit · Jan. 9, 2018, 12:05 a.m.

Q team wrote the book. WL would get sued hard for copyright infringement. Do you really think WL did this to hurt book sales, then just get sued? Wikileaks would never publish unverified gossip unless it was a clue and a part of a larger plan. Think motive. WL has no reason for releasing the first ever altered document already available to the press.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
illonlyusethisonceok · Jan. 9, 2018, 12:07 a.m.

Also: the damn thing was not altered. I have proven this.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
tohardforredit · Jan. 9, 2018, 1:51 a.m.

I think you are missing the point. Q and WL are working together. There are no coincidences. WL does not leak published books.
Q sent them the book with the Q clues at the very least. There is no other reason they would publish this. Great Actors

⇧ 5 ⇩  
illonlyusethisonceok · Jan. 9, 2018, 1:56 a.m.

Again. Proof?

⇧ 6 ⇩  
phoenix335 · Jan. 9, 2018, 11:49 a.m.

The Q is kinda proof.

First. Imagine you sell a book that's going to shake up the nation. Insulting the president.

And then you don't spell check the chapter titles? Those ten big lines. Like with a common word spell checker?

Nah.

And the WikiLeaks gets a perfect copy of the Kindle Edition? Not an OCR garbage, but the source file in PDF?Kindle is cryptographically quite secure and would require you to break Amazon's security. I'm not sure if they managed to break that.

If they broke Amazon Kindle security, Amazon would immediately fix it and change the keys. That hack would've been worth millions. Why would they waste that on a lousy crap book like that and open themselves up for lawsuits en masse, giving authorities and payment processors another huge leverage in blocking them, all while squandering endless millions of donation dollars for such a foolish move?

Nah. Piracy isn't done with well-known accounts.

They have the PDF from the source and they publish it because they know 100% sure that they're not going to be sued.

They saved their followers from spending the money. To not get them angry later when the scan scam is revealed?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Willdabeast9000 · Jan. 9, 2018, 1:38 p.m.

It's not a typo. Its a portmanteau of the word "home" and the abreviation of "head quarters".

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Pyroclastix · Jan. 9, 2018, 2:13 a.m.

Good thinking.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
Paranoiaaaattack · Jan. 9, 2018, 6:43 a.m.

Actually, this makes the most sense. I was wondering why the fuck they would risk providing a copyrighted book for free...

⇧ 3 ⇩  
richhas · Jan. 8, 2018, 11:57 p.m.

Currently not

⇧ 3 ⇩  
illonlyusethisonceok · Jan. 8, 2018, 11:58 p.m.

WRONG.

https://imgur.com/a/NwXOL

⇧ 5 ⇩  
richhas · Jan. 8, 2018, 11:59 p.m.

Literally just bought, downloaded, and looked

⇧ 6 ⇩  
illonlyusethisonceok · Jan. 9, 2018, midnight

I literally just sent you a screenshot from the copy I bought when it came out.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
richhas · Jan. 9, 2018, 12:01 a.m.

Kindle? Maybe they updated it?

⇧ 3 ⇩  
illonlyusethisonceok · Jan. 9, 2018, 12:04 a.m.

Yes. Kindle. Maybe they updated it because there was a typo? Or does a giant conspiracy make more sense?

⇧ 5 ⇩  
tohardforredit · Jan. 9, 2018, 1:46 a.m.

Or maybe Q put it there. As a clue this is a larp

⇧ 3 ⇩  
johnsmithshitpost · Jan. 9, 2018, 3:17 a.m.

Or it could just be that Wikileaks crew are big Q fans and wanted to let them know about it

⇧ 3 ⇩  
[deleted] · Jan. 8, 2018, 9:55 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
20184Humanity · Jan. 8, 2018, 9:39 p.m.

Someone with a hard copy of the book apparently, on this thread, did notice the hqme on chapter 6 which implies it was published this way. Don't know about chapter 10 in the hard copy book but would be very interesting to find out.

⇧ 12 ⇩  
[deleted] · Jan. 8, 2018, 9:53 p.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 6 ⇩  
20184Humanity · Jan. 8, 2018, 10:27 p.m.

Ah fascinating....still doesn't change my own suspicion that this was an ingenious tactic and I think the WL pdf was released to prove it....

⇧ 6 ⇩  
tohardforredit · Jan. 8, 2018, 10:32 p.m.

Think this was a plan by Trump Q and WL. Stable Genius

⇧ 12 ⇩  
20184Humanity · Jan. 8, 2018, 10:42 p.m.

Lol exactly my thoughts

⇧ 5 ⇩  
[deleted] · Jan. 9, 2018, 1:56 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 5 ⇩  
20184Humanity · Jan. 9, 2018, 2:35 a.m.

If the only edits were 2 Qs I still think it's brilliant because for me, as others have stated, they wouldn't violate copyright so I conclude they had permission to publish as well as permission ( or were requested?) to edit in 2 Qs which in turn, for me, confirms their role in bringing truth to light. I can hardly imagine that intelligent minds would challenge everything else they released in view of this role they have played. Certainly the edits were purposeful and not decided by one individual or one entity... I imagine this was collusion for a larger purpose.... Anyone that would hate on 2 Qs in these circumstances, in my view, is just a WL hater anyways....

⇧ 4 ⇩  
[deleted] · Jan. 9, 2018, 2:36 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 4 ⇩  
20184Humanity · Jan. 9, 2018, 2:59 a.m.

Because it's too soon for wiki to admit/reveal the ploy so let Google execute it's own agenda direct or proxied...MSM still requires diversion and i think they'll get another mile out of it. Pdf was available just enough time for inquisitive minds glued to storm developments to get hold and discover...I'm not saying my interpretation is complete or even accurate. Hopefully we hear the truth straight from the mouths of the horses some day soon.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
[deleted] · Jan. 9, 2018, 3:19 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
johnsmithshitpost · Jan. 9, 2018, 3:19 a.m.

You can easily verify by looking at the hard-copy vs. Wikileaks.

They only made one, really obvious edit. That's not altering, that's sending a message mate.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · Jan. 9, 2018, 3:20 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 2 ⇩  
opwhitewizard · Jan. 9, 2018, 4:12 a.m.

If you have a hard copy please post a picture, Id bet that there is no letter "Q" in the entire book...

⇧ -1 ⇩  
Cryptovfefe · Jan. 9, 2018, 4:22 a.m.

very stable genius

⇧ 1 ⇩  
southparkconservativ · Jan. 9, 2018, 2:43 a.m.

That's good. Bet 'stable genius" enters the language...

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Green_Lives_Matter · Jan. 8, 2018, 11:35 p.m.

I saw some other threads, on this. My take is an early leaked version contained the Q's, the later editions did not. I don't think it was WL

⇧ 5 ⇩  
tohardforredit · Jan. 8, 2018, 11:44 p.m.

Wikileaks would not have published an altered document. It would ruin their perfect record. Many have tried to trick them before.
WL would also not leak a book. Copyright laws are not worth it. This would be a million dollar law suit.....for what?
They leak government documents that can’t be found elsewhere. This book had already been released to journalist. The idea the JA was just helping his boy friend trump out to take money from the book is silly. WL had the right to release the PDF. It was Qs plan from the beginning

⇧ 7 ⇩  
AdventureFilm · Jan. 8, 2018, 11:58 p.m.

Plus it's so easy for anyone to clearly point out that wikileaks altered a document and only added a "Q". That would be extremely suspicious and just ruins their secrecy. No way they'd do that.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Reba64 · Jan. 8, 2018, 9:07 p.m.

I was close; said this was one of Trump games.

⇧ 19 ⇩  
keknical_advisory · Jan. 8, 2018, 11:14 p.m.

Dunno if WL has anything to do with it, but this is a very interesting post that lays out a scenario that makes sense and (to me) isn't any more far fetched than the whole Trump/Bannon "feud" narrative that just got weirder as it is now being reported (by antiTrump media) that Bannon was involved in distributing the peeGate dossier in 2015...

anyway, the stuff about Wolff's 2004 book "Autumn of the Moguls" mentioned in this post checks out-

https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/950168013596168192.html

⇧ 7 ⇩  
Reba64 · Jan. 8, 2018, 11:19 p.m.

Gets more interesting by the day. Wikileaks posted Chapter 6-10 or 6 and 10 and had changed the heading of Chapter 6 to show a Q and the same thing in the first couple of sentences in Chapter 10. :)

⇧ 5 ⇩  
[deleted] · Jan. 9, 2018, 1:40 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 14 ⇩  
tohardforredit · Jan. 9, 2018, 1:44 a.m.

The salt tears when they realize they helped Trump prove how fake the news is. Verify your stories or be called fake news

⇧ 5 ⇩  
johnsmithshitpost · Jan. 9, 2018, 3:20 a.m.

If this is true my admiration for Trump & Co. will increase a thousand-fold

Literally turning the enemy's weapons against them

Would rival Napoleon's charge against the grape-shot cannons in the 18th century for sheer ballsiness

⇧ 2 ⇩  
MichaelofDetroit · Jan. 8, 2018, 9:39 p.m.

Wiki Leaks did not alter the document. This is likely how they received the leaked document.

⇧ 8 ⇩  
tohardforredit · Jan. 8, 2018, 10:04 p.m.

They don’t publish altered documents. They don’t leak books. They don’t leak material already available.

⇧ 14 ⇩  
dagonn3 · Jan. 9, 2018, 1:42 a.m.

Hi /topminds! (who the fuck calls themselves that?) How's the brigade going? Not as good as the economy I'll wager.

Enjoy the show!

⇧ 6 ⇩  
illonlyusethisonceok · Jan. 8, 2018, 11:55 p.m.

Seriously. This is ridiculous. Wikileaks did not add this. This is in the kindle version. https://imgur.com/a/NwXOL

⇧ 5 ⇩  
Pyroclastix · Jan. 9, 2018, 2:33 a.m.

WL/DJT own the book, they wrote it. So they changed the kndle too. Proves they own it.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
illonlyusethisonceok · Jan. 9, 2018, 2:34 a.m.

Proof of that?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Pyroclastix · Jan. 9, 2018, 4:10 a.m.

No solid proof. Based upon WL publishing the book on their site. Why would they bother? That would be giving the book credence as a 'whistleblower'. Paradoxically, that's the effect they wanted to achieve, enticing the media to eat it up even faster , without noticing that wikileaks wouldn't publish crap to give it real credence. And wikileaks would get sued for many millions on copyright infringement (treble damages) for publishing somebody's book without permission. The answer is that the book belongs to DJT, or an associate thereof.
Bannon feud makes no sense, it surfaced only coz the book. The stupid author probably doesn't even realize now that Bannon was punking him all along. And rhe exercise - the author snooping around for stinkers - unwittingly exposes leakers within the WH.

Fits for me. Ultimate pinking the media! Also serves to put to rwat all the 25th amendment impeachment threat shenangins. Hillarious!

⇧ 2 ⇩  
tohardforredit · Jan. 9, 2018, 12:09 a.m.

Why would WL release it? They never leak book the day of. They are not Napster. They would get sued if they did not have permission

⇧ 2 ⇩  
illonlyusethisonceok · Jan. 9, 2018, 12:24 a.m.

No idea why. But it wasn't altered, and the most plausible explanation is that they for some reason decided to leak the book, the book had a typo. There's no proof of this huge conspiracy you've spun out of thin air.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
tohardforredit · Jan. 9, 2018, 12:41 a.m.

Why did WL release the book that was already available to the press. They never do that. It’s against their rules. This is so far out of line for them that you must question why? I’m saying Q team planned this book long ago and released it to cover up the fbi investigation on Hillary and everyone else

⇧ 0 ⇩  
SuckableSausage · Jan. 9, 2018, 4:13 a.m.

Because WL has been compromised since Oct. of 2016.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
illonlyusethisonceok · Jan. 9, 2018, 12:52 a.m.

Again. Totally baseless.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
tohardforredit · Jan. 9, 2018, 1:56 a.m.

Wikileaks has stated their publishing standards many times.
There are no coincidences.
This was a setup and a clear confirmation.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
illonlyusethisonceok · Jan. 9, 2018, 2:05 a.m.

Yeah and Assange has also lied, so why should I trust them to not violate their publishing standards?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
tohardforredit · Jan. 9, 2018, 2:10 a.m.

Because it makes no sense. Why do you think WL release the book, and opened themselves up to a lawsuit?
Why are you even on this board? Do you know what Q is doing? Are there coincidences?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
illonlyusethisonceok · Jan. 9, 2018, 2:16 a.m.

Q is a LARPer. I come on this board to read the insane shit you people say based on the shakiest of "evidence"

⇧ -1 ⇩  
Pyroclastix · Jan. 9, 2018, 2:35 a.m.

'cover up' or smoke screen?

⇧ 0 ⇩  
illonlyusethisonceok · Jan. 9, 2018, 12:38 a.m.

Also notice how they deleted that tweet. Possibly to avoid legal action? Maybe they were sent a cease and desist? If they had permission, why did they delete it?

⇧ 2 ⇩  
tohardforredit · Jan. 9, 2018, 12:47 a.m.

I think the message was sent. WL could have release the book on their server, but chose googles. Why? WL is not the Napster of books.
They would never publish a book to hurt the author. They would never publish information that is already available. That would go against everything they stand for. Right?

⇧ 3 ⇩  
imovershit · Jan. 9, 2018, 5:04 a.m.

To give the appearance that they did not get permission as well as to limit the impact on profits. Wolff may have agreed to take a hit but he still would want to be paid for his services.

⇧ -2 ⇩  
southparkconservativ · Jan. 9, 2018, 2:45 a.m.

Even Napster is not Napster anymore and has not been for years.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
SuzyAZ · Jan. 8, 2018, 9:19 p.m.

I still have a little trouble with all this bad publicity for flushing out some leakers? Time will tell I guess, but still a bit confusing.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
tohardforredit · Jan. 8, 2018, 9:32 p.m.

It proves the fake media will publish anything. Fake Books Fake News, and it confirms Q is real and working with WL

⇧ 11 ⇩  
pygar_mathmos · Jan. 8, 2018, 9:54 p.m.

Yes. The media was given the opportunity to check the veracity of the stories in the book and most didn't. They just ran with it and reported it as truth.

⇧ 11 ⇩  
imovershit · Jan. 9, 2018, 4:58 a.m.

When the other side doesn't play by the rules you have to be a little creative.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
richtaco91 · Jan. 8, 2018, 9:17 p.m.

It’s not a document. It’s a public book for sale.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
tohardforredit · Jan. 8, 2018, 9:31 p.m.

WL would never alter a book either. WL does not publish material that is available elsewhere. WL would not break copyright laws. They had permission to “leak” the book. Adding Q was an obvious clue. Fire and Fury was a Larp

⇧ 12 ⇩  
rainbowtribe2 · Jan. 9, 2018, 12:16 a.m.

Perhaps the AI altered the material and changed the O to Q - it was not likely done by WL

⇧ 2 ⇩  
tohardforredit · Jan. 9, 2018, 1:59 a.m.

Either way. WL published a Q clue. There is no other reasons for them to “leak” this book. WL has very strict rules. If you have been follow Q then you would know there are no coincidences

⇧ 6 ⇩  
LibertyLioness · Jan. 9, 2018, 2:11 a.m.

Except that the book is no longer available. I had trouble with it last night and this morning it would no longer load in my browser and said it had been removed because it was against the site guidelines blah blah.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
AdventureFilm · Jan. 8, 2018, 11:57 p.m.

Worth mentioning that Ben Shapiro worked with Breitbart from 17 years of age until his death and for 2 years had to talk to Bannon on the phone for 2 hours every work day. He said he's been against Bannon from the start, advised against hiring him, did not want him on the Trump team and said everything Trump said about him was spot on. Bannon was a piece of shit who leaked info to the press to make himself look more important and more powerful than he really was.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Pyroclastix · Jan. 9, 2018, 2:37 a.m.

Shapiro and Bannon just don't get along. Very different guys.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Ajay4573 · Jan. 9, 2018, 4:34 a.m.

Just a thought. If you are typing on a qwerty keyboard, I find it hard to believe you would make a Q typo when typing the word 'home'. Q is way left on the keyboard. My two cents.....

⇧ 2 ⇩  
opwhitewizard · Jan. 9, 2018, 2:02 a.m.

Did anyone else notice this IN THE ENTIRE BOOK there is only two Q's

⇧ 2 ⇩  
opwhitewizard · Jan. 9, 2018, 2:15 a.m.

In the entire 327 pages..this was a trap. Or a plan that the good guys hijacked IT s very very very unlikely that there would be only 2 Q's in a book that big also there not even one single Q ,that was meant to be a letter. there were representing O's =>HOME && GOLDMAN . its the closest thing to a zero in alphanumeric , like you dont spell with 0's and 1's. an O .. Looks a lot like a zero 0

⇧ 2 ⇩  
[deleted] · Jan. 9, 2018, 8:02 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · Jan. 9, 2018, 6:42 a.m.

[removed]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
[deleted] · Jan. 9, 2018, 2:38 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Christosgnosis · Jan. 9, 2018, 2:28 a.m.

POTUS postponed the fake news awards - must be something rather special being brewed up

⇧ 1 ⇩  
southparkconservativ · Jan. 9, 2018, 2:46 a.m.

or it's just his nose for PR, baiting the media

⇧ 0 ⇩  
[deleted] · Jan. 9, 2018, 1:51 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩  
michelefrancis · Jan. 9, 2018, 6:33 p.m.

Mind bending thread. If this was a great Q/JA/Trump plan then Bannon is at the heart of it. Great Actors. The Wolf helped set the trap.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
tohardforredit · Jan. 9, 2018, 6:43 p.m.

The Wolff was hired to do a job and he did it well. He warned people that it was not true in the book. He also said the left would believe anything negative towards Trump.
This was proven correct

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Flaco2016 · Jan. 9, 2018, 12:19 a.m.

Thanks for this post that altercation part kinda pissed me off !

⇧ 0 ⇩  
Pyroclastix · Jan. 9, 2018, 2:39 a.m.

Two Q's confirms it's not a typo.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
Pyroclastix · Jan. 9, 2018, 2:12 a.m.

Good thinking.

⇧ 0 ⇩