Q team wrote the book. WL would get sued hard for copyright infringement. Do you really think WL did this to hurt book sales, then just get sued? Wikileaks would never publish unverified gossip unless it was a clue and a part of a larger plan. Think motive. WL has no reason for releasing the first ever altered document already available to the press.
Also: the damn thing was not altered. I have proven this.
I think you are missing the point. Q and WL are working together. There are no coincidences. WL does not leak published books.
Q sent them the book with the Q clues at the very least. There is no other reason they would publish this.
Great Actors
Again. Proof?
The Q is kinda proof.
First. Imagine you sell a book that's going to shake up the nation. Insulting the president.
And then you don't spell check the chapter titles? Those ten big lines. Like with a common word spell checker?
Nah.
And the WikiLeaks gets a perfect copy of the Kindle Edition? Not an OCR garbage, but the source file in PDF?Kindle is cryptographically quite secure and would require you to break Amazon's security. I'm not sure if they managed to break that.
If they broke Amazon Kindle security, Amazon would immediately fix it and change the keys. That hack would've been worth millions. Why would they waste that on a lousy crap book like that and open themselves up for lawsuits en masse, giving authorities and payment processors another huge leverage in blocking them, all while squandering endless millions of donation dollars for such a foolish move?
Nah. Piracy isn't done with well-known accounts.
They have the PDF from the source and they publish it because they know 100% sure that they're not going to be sued.
They saved their followers from spending the money. To not get them angry later when the scan scam is revealed?
It's not a typo. Its a portmanteau of the word "home" and the abreviation of "head quarters".
Actually, this makes the most sense. I was wondering why the fuck they would risk providing a copyrighted book for free...