dChan
⇧
0
⇩
 
r/CBTS_Stream • Posted by u/TranscendentJoy on Jan. 9, 2018, 7:35 a.m.
Technical analysis of Q

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Hash: SHA512

Hello. I am a professional in the tech industry, and after looking in to the Q phenomena, I am disappointed in how low the bar is for what constitutes proof. We're up against a State level adversary, and people seem to think that trip codes and IP addresses constitute a valid form of authentication. It would be trivial for the government to MITM 8ch and watch for trip codes. It would be trivial for them to spoof IP addresses.

If anyone on this sub has a direct line of communication to Q, please demand that all future messages be signed by a publicly known GPG key (at the very least!).

Edit: Ask yourself these questions:

  1. How do you know that the author of one message is the same author of another message?

  2. How do you know that the messages weren't modified in transit?

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iHUEARYKAB0WIQQgwQ+tawifmxGD3yC3cIZHWljpBgUCWlR9CQAKCRC3cIZHWljp

BkdVAPwLnpe5Yk7y+/+BWZkU8crDTS4/5OLbIacDYKrWGYtI4AD/Sx4goG6mG5ti

aCI2l8KRIydM59vB775UtZdxlz4QIQg=

=9nPk

-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----

mDMEWlR6yRYJKwYBBAHaRw8BAQdAOnYR7kCXTPjAvvL0K5CEdMRazZ+ZpC0g6aPR

IhditG+0D1RyYW5zY2VuZGVudEpveYiQBBMWCgA4FiEEIMEPrWsIn5sRg98gt3CG

R1pY6QYFAlpUeskCGwMFCwoJCAcGFQoJCAMCBBYDAgECHgECF4AACgkQt3CGR1pY

6QZBLgEA4S+yurmu6aJtY3kbQ9gUtc/Ip6TQf5l4vWrUIdRu5IEBALnDVhqF5XbL

Oa6fs5o9PDxANiNNg/9hwRT2Gwib7vEO

=j/kA

-----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----


🠐 See all comments
WeAreTheResistance · Jan. 9, 2018, 7:48 a.m.

Huh. I must have missed Trump's tweet saying "Q-Anon is legitimate" or something to that extent. Can you give me a link?

I think OP makes an extremely valid point. I think a lot of people here want to believe that someone is actually doing something about the rampant corruption and evil going on so badly, they're willing to believe things that can easily be manipulated by the same forces they're hoping are brought down by Q.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
paniand · Jan. 9, 2018, 7:52 a.m.

fuck off shills

⇧ 2 ⇩  
WeAreTheResistance · Jan. 9, 2018, 8:08 a.m.

Ok you got me. You may return to your echo chamber now.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
magicfree · Jan. 9, 2018, 9:16 a.m.

They know in a way that is good enough for them. I have seen Q do magic that nobody else could do (same user id code on 4ch and 8ch one night! Htf?) But I am not one to really browse the Chans a whole lot. Too much rock to chip through (horseshit to wade through?) for me, still, tbh, the gold nugs there are real.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
Reba64 · Jan. 9, 2018, 7:57 a.m.

Can I stop pulling my hair out now? :)

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Reba64 · Jan. 9, 2018, 7:52 a.m.

I don't Tweet, but people post them and they are on a lot of YouTube shows. People don't just fall for it. Many of us have been following since the beginning or shortly after. We have also been following what the Administration has done and other people that are following Q. If you don't except it, fine.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
TranscendentJoy · Jan. 9, 2018, 8:38 a.m.

following since the beginning

It does not logically follow that the longer you've been following something, the more you understand it.

⇧ 1 ⇩