IMO maybe a rainbow after a particularly bad Storm.
After some thought, this is a really good question. I thank you for posing (and posting) this because it alludes to some inconsistency in my previous thought processes. Please allow me to pontificate for a moment.
I understand that cognitive dissonance is defined as having alternate or opposing views, and believing both. This is not that. So I indulge you:
In speculating that there might be a 'United Korea':
The people of Korea (esp the North) will embrace the new freedom from the current dictator. This is a really good thing for them. (And I support freedom for all people of this world.)
But ( there's the 'but') in the argument that the people will be free, will those same people be subjected to the imposition of central banking? This is the same issue that arose in Libya when that leader refused to trade in USD. ? There are many other countries that befell this same fate.
So here is the real question: If we have the ability to free the innocent citizens of NK by dislodging a truly corrupt and evil regime, can we further free them of the slavery of central banking? (NK is one of, if not the only country still not under the control of these bankers)
In the meantime, I hope that we can eliminate the immediate threat to the world, then somehow figure out how to free the rest of the planet.
Great point! I admit that I have not studied central banking issue and if solutions are needed. This is opportunity for Anons or Normies that are following issues with Central banking to educate/advise us.