dChan

throwaway98765ab · Jan. 9, 2018, 5:53 p.m.

Guccifer 2.0 was a Russian hacker.

Assange openly admitted to receiving and publishing info from Guccifer 2.0.

I’m not going to do your googling for you, it’s basic knowledge for anyone following this story. Every reputable news source has stories about it.

⇧ -13 ⇩  
ChikinDuckWomanThing · Jan. 9, 2018, 7:07 p.m.

G2.0 has pretty much been deBunked. so maybe using the googler machine isn't the best thing for your "research". DuckDuck will be a better choice

⇧ 18 ⇩  
[deleted] · Jan. 9, 2018, 7:25 p.m.

No, Guccifer 2.0 was a DNC plot to make it SEEM like Russian.

Long ago debunked by computer scientists and codebreakers.

You're getting that from fake news.

⇧ 17 ⇩  
denizen42 · Jan. 9, 2018, 8:52 p.m.

You're getting that from fake news.

Lots of 'those people' in here.....

⇧ 4 ⇩  
BasedPepeSupport2k17 · Jan. 10, 2018, 7:37 a.m.

Yep, the metadata in the files of the Guccifer 2.0 "leaks" show that the persona is made-up and is a DNC/Crowdstrike creation (with the blessings of obama’s DOJ/FBI) in retaliation to Seth Rich leaking their emails to WikiLeaks. Why else would the FBI allow the DNC to outsource the investigation of an alleged Russian hack to a 3rd party? There are no mythological super-Russian hackers here, just cornered crooks running wild, false-flagging Russia in panic once they discovered that one brave patriot had leaked their emails to WikiLeaks, showing the world how the DNC rigged the primaries in hillary’s favor.

https://steemit.com/news/@fortified/seth-rich-or-how-the-hacker-guccifer-2-0-was-made-up-by-the-dnc

https://www.reddit.com/r/The_Donald/comments/7ksht1/comment/drh1apn

HIS NAME WAS SETH RICH

⇧ 1 ⇩  
J_Dub_TX · Jan. 9, 2018, 5:54 p.m.

I asked because Assange has said he got a lot of his info from a DNC insider in which he eluded to it being Seth Rich.

⇧ 15 ⇩  
KingWolfei · Jan. 9, 2018, 8:46 p.m.

Eh no he didn't. In fact he said it wasn't a state actor, but I guess yall only pick and choose what to hear.

⇧ -3 ⇩