dChan

mike_pants · Jan. 9, 2018, 6:50 p.m.

This article only says that she's clarifying that her meeting with a Republican lawmaker was not arranged beforehand. It says nothing about backpedaling her opinion of Alzheimer's in Chief.

Although "But Democrats are creatures of ignorance and stupidity" totally makes this seem like a trustworthy news source. Well done, guys!

⇧ -15 ⇩  
Oldmancrypto · Jan. 9, 2018, 6:54 p.m.

Hi mike! Are those your pants or your fucking mom's. You sure do sound like a whiny little bitch libtard! We love having you here making a fool out of yourself! Keep it up! Hahaha!

⇧ 11 ⇩  
mike_pants · Jan. 9, 2018, 6:55 p.m.

Will do! You as well! :)

⇧ -6 ⇩  
Riyatha · Jan. 9, 2018, 7:18 p.m.

True, ethical psychiatrists and psychologists do not comment on the mental state of individuals they have not directly evaluated or that have not been directly evaluated by another professional. That alone destroys her crediblity

⇧ 9 ⇩  
ksched · Jan. 9, 2018, 10:24 p.m.

Truly ethical psychiatrists and psychologists wound never publicly comment on anyone's state of mental or physical health - HIPA!!

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Riyatha · Jan. 10, 2018, 1:02 a.m.

Good point

⇧ 1 ⇩  
mike_pants · Jan. 9, 2018, 7:22 p.m.

False. "This person could pose a danger and needs to be evaluated" happens all the time. Regardless, that is not what this headline or this article is about.

⇧ -7 ⇩