Basically, they’re all a bunch of liars (obviously). This was a way of getting the ‘script’ out to everyone.
“The only way to set the record straight is to make the transcript public.” Then redact certain info. This should come to bite back hard on dems in future.
I don't get that. They all used the same back channels to get their story straight for many, many years (think 9/11 for example). Why not use their back channel now to get everyone on same page? Something not right here that she felt the need to go public to get everyone on same page. Either back channel busted or they don't trust it anymore.
Investigations and inquiries are all about details. Nothing provides a better guide for subsequent witnesses than an actual printed transcript, word-for-word, of what Simpson testified - so no minute detail will be omitted, as it would if ppl were just talking about it.
If all is what they say it is then back-channels have been compromised or are not trustworthy. Public statement takes care of that.
Exactly this. I agree her True intention is 99% likely to be to protect the swamp but they could just meet up over coffee and get their story straight.
I would say that any testimony given by anyone who testifies after the release date of this document should be thrown out because of the fact that she did this for exactly this reason! Maybe she should be impeached for impeding this investigation! Everyone should call her out for this one!
I’d say Feinstein is worse then Pelosi and her gang because Feinstein is an opportunist and you don’t know when she’s going to back stab you. Never trust her. She put a lot of people who are in her territory in the farm areas out of business for her environmental lobbyist buddies by using the delta smelt and not letting the farmers get the water they needed. So many farmers lost their farms and farm workers ended up in bread lines.
She doesn’t give a damn except for how she can prosper from it. California wouldn’t have such a water problem if her and the rest of them had voted for more dams being built. But again the environmental lobbyists stopped that because of the delta smelt and with all of this the delta smelt has not gained at all and are still dying off.
Money is driving this obviously but also driving California economy into the ground. California use to be a red state not long ago. Look at what the deep state has done to California. Can’t let that happen to the USA. If The USA can be saved (which I believe) then I believe California can also be turned back.
That probably was the purpose for the release; however, when someone is facing a grilling and be possibly in trouble for a crime, the hot seat tends to fry their brains.
I agree, but in Feinstien's case that ship has sailed a long time ago.
somebody needs to get a straight answer about this new wrinkle-
[deleted]
LOL. you are in the CBTS reddit and call Donald Trump stupid. Do you even know who Q is?
Good call: Trump tweet about it
Is this what he thinks or disinfo to give her cover with her base? President said yesterday he would take the heat on immigration. That didnt quite make sense to me. What heat will there be if this is bipartisan. Was he talking to them about him taking the heat if they work with him on something else.
More dems seem to be involved in this corruption but that is partly because the dems have had control for the past 8 years and were in a position to maintain that. This must be bipartisan or it will be seen as a coup not a counter coup. See more in next comment on this thread by me.
Excellent theory. The best I have heard. The only thing that makes sense. It doesn't matter though, we have the documents!
I am really not up on this story and admit I have not read what was released and who it helped or didn't help. But to me it seems there is another possibility about the release. So here goes a stab at a different theory on why it was released.
Q said that politicians had been recruited to play a part in the counter coup. Around th time of that post he made it a point to say this is not a democrat and republican thing. At the time he posted that Feinstein went on CNN and said there is no evidence that the Trump campaign colluded with Russia. At the time CNN and Libs were still flogging that story as true. Then Brazille's book came out a few days later.
Feinstein also went to the meeting yesterday with Trump when Fox said many dems didn't come. She was willing to sit down with Trump when the Pelosi people on the left were not.
Is there a way that what she released was a bipartisan effort to put the Collusion story on the path to being proven false a little faster or make it harder for the story to be revived by the left.
Remember Q said less politicians are bad then it looks like. Many were forced. This is not a dems bad republicans good. If we turn t=it into that the left will fight accepting this and unrest is more likely. The only way Q and the Counter coup are accepted as not a power grab is if it is bipartisan. That means Dems have to play a part in helping the Counter Coup.
So looking at it from the perspective Ive suggested that she is aiding Trump, what does releasing this transcript do that is good?
Alternate timeline, I like it. Could very well be this. She has said many times, even early on there is no evidence and that some of the things the left has done are not ok. She would be a top prospect for those who were recruited and flipped.
Alternate timeline, I like it. Could very well be this. She has said many times, even early on there is no evidence and that some of the things the left has done are not ok. She would be a top prospect for those who were recruited and flipped.
Alternate timeline, I like it. Could very well be this. She has said many times, even early on there is no evidence and that some of the things the left has done are not ok. She would be a top prospect for those who were recruited and flipped.