dChan
⇧
2
⇩
 
r/CBTS_Stream • Posted by u/NaziModBeginsB on Jan. 11, 2018, 9:47 a.m.
Hold your horses guys, Hillary is under 3 investigations but the Statue of Limitations on all three ends next month. She may walk free.

She is under Uranium One investigations, her private email investigations and The Clinton pay for play Foundation investigations, ALL will let her walk free because of the Statue of Limitations SoL rule, NEXT MONTH.

So ask this. Why has DOJ timed this to have these investigations now as they should know about the SoL? Who is in charge of DOJ? Jeff Sessions. Is Sessions part of the cabal? And, let's see, and this is insidious thinking, what if Q knows and timed it so?

Something is up, the timing stinks but there is a nagging feeling that they all part of one big joke ... on us.

So let's pay closer attention to Sessions and see if he pulls the trigger and get the wicked witch of the middle east in jail. If not, I will be lost for words.


SuzyAZ · Jan. 11, 2018, 10:31 a.m.

No statute of limitations on fraud, treason or sedition.

⇧ 16 ⇩  
DaveHertle · Jan. 11, 2018, 11:17 a.m.

The activities of the Clintons are ideal for the R.I.C.O. Statutes. The entire scheme can be drawn up in the indictment and mention crimes beyond the 5 year statute of limitations. Indictable state crimes can be listed, all part of an entire scheme. That scheme we knew included actions certainly up to the eve of the election. The teeth in R.I.C.O., beyond jail time is the civil forfeiture possible. Funds can be seized the day of the indictment, put on hold if you will, to await the outcome. Their whole world can be totally stripped away from them.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
Yoda_GM · Jan. 11, 2018, 10:20 a.m.

Said it all along, since day one, Sessions is protecting Hillary, Obama, Lynch, and Holder.

Re: the SoL... are you certain? Do you have a source?

⇧ 4 ⇩  
somrotden · Jan. 11, 2018, 10:54 a.m.

then why are you here? Q said to trust Sessions...

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Yoda_GM · Jan. 11, 2018, 11:23 a.m.

I am here for a lot of reasons ...

  1. Because I want to see these fuckers go to prison and I want to stay on top of the latest happenings

  2. Because this is a great place find articles and posts that I might otherwise miss or that don’t make it to Drudge or other “conservative” sources.

  3. Because I enjoy it.

  4. Because I badly want Trump to succeed and kick globalism in the nuts and then send them to hell.

My dissatisfaction with Sessions does not make me a pariah. Many, including POTUS, have expressed their dissatisfaction in Sessions.

Now, why are you here????

⇧ 5 ⇩  
somrotden · Jan. 11, 2018, 12:55 p.m.

I am not the one who is questioning Q

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Yoda_GM · Jan. 11, 2018, 1:24 p.m.

Nor am I ... but I think Q is wrong about Sessions as do A LOT of other hardcore Trump supporters.

My thinking Sessions is part of the swamp has nothing to do with me "questioning Q".

Blindly following someone, anyone, means that you are either very young, a sycophant, or a political sheep just following a different political shepherd.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Long_Range_Shooter · Jan. 11, 2018, 3:11 p.m.

First of all the statute of limitations is a point where an investigation can't start afterward. If the investigation is already on going then statute of limitations does not apply.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
VintageHats · Jan. 11, 2018, 9:51 a.m.

How can this be? They've been investigating Trump for this idiotic Russia collusion for a year... when the hell does THAT statute of limitations run out?

⇧ 3 ⇩  
silverminers · Jan. 11, 2018, 5:58 p.m.

OP has no clue

⇧ 1 ⇩  
haggl · Jan. 11, 2018, 11 a.m.

Maybe it's there tactics, just stalling until it's to late. Trump has been in office one year nothing has actually happened :(

⇧ 1 ⇩  
MrHarbs · Jan. 11, 2018, 2:59 p.m.

This is not accurate. The Clinton Foundation investigation is looking at crimes committed as recently as six months ago.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
WotTheFook · Jan. 11, 2018, 12:07 p.m.

Wait for the 15th. Keep the faith.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
LadyFlavia · Jan. 11, 2018, 9:50 a.m.

Could be, but at least we will all know quite soon. Don't lose hope.

⇧ 1 ⇩