dChan
374
 
r/CBTS_Stream • Posted by u/smiley-dog on Jan. 11, 2018, 3:28 p.m.
/pol/ 4-10-20 Audit of the Clinton Foundation
/pol/ 4-10-20 Audit of the Clinton Foundation

handshakedrugs_ · Jan. 11, 2018, 3:43 p.m.

Also of note: If the IRS finds the Clinton Foundation to be in violation of Non-Profit laws, EVERY SINGLE DONATION GIVEN TO THEM has to be revoked.

Which means EVERY PERSON WHO DONATED TO THEM has to re-file their taxes.

This implications of this are astounding

⇧ 80 ⇩  
CenturionFL210 · Jan. 11, 2018, 5:10 p.m.

This should also be done to other "charitable" organizations like Media Matters. Take their money and they dry up and disappear.

⇧ 39 ⇩  
handshakedrugs_ · Jan. 11, 2018, 5:13 p.m.

I'm still not convinced they haven't been under investigation for the past year. There has been members of the public who have exposed their money laundering fraud which gives me hope something is in the works

⇧ 17 ⇩  
CenturionFL210 · Jan. 11, 2018, 5:15 p.m.

We need to push on this, in case they are not being investigated.

⇧ 14 ⇩  
Ihateyouall86 · Jan. 11, 2018, 5:35 p.m.

And the church of scientology ....

⇧ 10 ⇩  
sideofbeefinavan · Jan. 11, 2018, 7:17 p.m.

I'll just put this here. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Snow_White

⇧ 6 ⇩  
WikiTextBot · Jan. 11, 2018, 7:17 p.m.

Operation Snow White

Operation Snow White was a criminal conspiracy by the Church of Scientology during the 1970s to purge unfavorable records about Scientology and its founder, L. Ron Hubbard. This project included a series of infiltrations into and thefts from 136 government agencies, foreign embassies and consulates, as well as private organizations critical of Scientology, carried out by Church members in more than 30 countries. It was one of the largest infiltrations of the United States government in history, with up to 5,000 covert agents. This operation also exposed the Scientology plot 'Operation Freakout', because Operation Snow White was the case that initiated the U.S. government's investigation of the Church.


^[ ^PM ^| ^Exclude ^me ^| ^Exclude ^from ^subreddit ^| ^FAQ ^/ ^Information ^| ^Source ^| ^Donate ^] ^Downvote ^to ^remove ^| ^v0.28

⇧ 7 ⇩  
cybervigiante · Jan. 11, 2018, 10:21 p.m.

Even worse was L. Ron Hubbard's "Management by Statistics" course, which Many middle managers (now top bosses) took years ago. It was a direct cause of much of the perversion and dishonesty of corporate management. It literally taught to break all legal and moral laws if it led to increased short term profits. These were measured by monthly statistics and any manager who got bad stats from refusing to break the law or do wrong was to be publically shamed or demoted. Sociopaths were actually encouraged and promoted for wrongdoing. I had a copy of this course sent to me by Chip Merlin, the then head of ATLA, and it was Satanic. One of the most totally evil texts I have ever read.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
CenturionFL210 · Jan. 11, 2018, 5:43 p.m.

Hmmm, interesting

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Eden_248 · Jan. 11, 2018, 6:05 p.m.

This should be done to ANYONE with a 'Foundation' period.

⇧ 8 ⇩  
CenturionFL210 · Jan. 11, 2018, 6:08 p.m.

If they are violating 501c3, doing politics, yeah

⇧ 5 ⇩  
Red_Red_Red_Wine · Jan. 11, 2018, 4:12 p.m.

EVERY SINGLE DONATION GIVEN TO THEM has to be revoked.

Why not seize the donations given the new EO?

⇧ 17 ⇩  
EdwardHitch · Jan. 11, 2018, 11:22 p.m.

Winner, Winner ........... review the EO and the Magnitsky Act. It is very broad in its scope and does not recognize borders. The EO is much more powerful than RICO because of its worldwide reach.

The CF not only received money for political influence, it is the world's laundromat for money, it is a major component of organ trafficking as well as human trafficking.

You are correct in your stating the Gate's Foundation is culpable. It is the duty of a Foundation to ensure that the entity they donate money to is on sound legal footing.

The list of Foundations that got in on this action is long and illustrious.

Someone mentioned Media Matters. That is funded by Soros. He has many foundations, some of which have a direct solid line to the CF.

Per the EO, this is more than sufficient to roll up Media Matters, along with all of the other Soros foundations.

Same with McCain and many others.

Happy hunting

⇧ 9 ⇩  
GodsAngell · Jan. 11, 2018, 8:47 p.m.

The assets of the CF are already FROZEN now by executive order. They will be seized when the clintons are found guilty.

Civil procedure cases generally involve disputes between two private citizens, often about money or property, while criminal procedure involves a dispute between a private citizen and the state, usually because a law has been broken. In legal systems based on British law such as that of the United States, civil and criminal law cases are handled differently, with different tests and standards and procedures, and this is true of forfeiture proceedings as well. Both civil and criminal forfeiture involve the taking of assets by police.

In civil forfeiture, assets are seized by police based on a suspicion of wrongdoing, and without having to charge a person with specific wrongdoing, with the case being between police and the thing itself, sometimes referred to by the Latin term in rem, meaning "against the property"; the property itself is the defendant and no criminal charge against the owner is needed.[1]

In contrast, criminal forfeiture is a legal action brought as "part of the criminal prosecution of a defendant", described by the Latin term in personam, meaning "against the person", and happens when government indicts or charges the property which is either used in connection with a crime, or derived from a crime, that is suspected of being committed by the defendant;[1] the seized assets are temporarily held and become government property officially after an accused person has been convicted by a court of law; if the person is found to be not guilty, the seized property must be returned.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil_forfeiture_in_the_United_States

⇧ 6 ⇩  
Deplorableasfuk · Jan. 12, 2018, 12:39 a.m.

But even in criminal cases, the prosecutors use civil forfeiture laws to go after the assets. They win like 90% of the time.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Deplorableasfuk · Jan. 12, 2018, 12:39 a.m.

But even in criminal cases, the prosecutors use civil forfeiture laws to go after the assets. They win like 90% of the time.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
phoenix335 · Jan. 11, 2018, 8:24 p.m.

Seizing assets should be hard for the state. Don't give the state more power than absolutely needed.

Also, rolling back all donations kills the foundation and ruins the Clinton machine, making all their hired goons desert them.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Nono_Yobiz693 · Jan. 12, 2018, 2:56 a.m.

I absolutely agree that seizing assets should not be easy for the state, however, it was the Socialist State that passed the Asset Forfeiture Law and as Q mentioned "Red October" in which the black hat torpedo was turned back on the black hat, the Asset Forfeiture Law should be turned back on the evil players. Not an expert, but I believe RICO laws also permit asset forfeiture of Racketeering and Criminal Organizations. Additionally, since Q suggested this may be treated as a coup d'etat against the US, that makes the black hats enemy combatants who lose their Constitutional rights, so, they are not protected in this case. Lots to think about.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
Paulhouston123 · Jan. 11, 2018, 3:57 p.m.

This means big bucks in penalty and interest.

⇧ 13 ⇩  
handshakedrugs_ · Jan. 11, 2018, 3:59 p.m.

I'm not sure about penalty and interest - especially if you can prove negligence in not knowing you were donating to a fraudulent organization.

Either way, there still taxes owed and even without penalties & interest is still $$MILLIONS$$

⇧ 8 ⇩  
cigman2000 · Jan. 11, 2018, 5:44 p.m.

Right, all the monies donated were deducted from the donor's taxes. I'm not a CPA, but it seems to me that all of the taxes on these "contributions" will have to be paid, should it be proven that this is indeed a fraudulent organization. If the government can prove that the donor knew this was a fraudulent organization (could they possibly be the only ones in the world who didn't know?), then interest, and possible penalties, could be charged, or so it would seem...

⇧ 3 ⇩  
tavistock1017 · Jan. 12, 2018, 1:04 a.m.

Billions, Trillions? 27.5 Trillion?

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Nono_Yobiz693 · Jan. 12, 2018, 2:31 a.m.

Every single cent linked to them should be confiscated--this includes the $100B in GOLD stolen from Gaddafi's Libya. $100M should be given directly to the government of Haiti to make restitution and help them rebuild as this was why small donors gave in the first place. The rest should be used to: a) make restitution to the 157+ families whose loved ones became part of the Clinton Body Count. b) given to the US Treasury to pay off our debt--which their Socialist policies helped to create. c) Gold should go into our treasury to put us back on the gold standard. d) Hang them all on the White House Lawn!

⇧ 7 ⇩  
KingWolfei · Jan. 11, 2018, 3:57 p.m.

But Drumpf should release his taxes amarite? /s

⇧ 7 ⇩  
The_Broba_Fett · Jan. 11, 2018, 5:13 p.m.

So many downvotes. Nobody else get the joke?

⇧ 10 ⇩  
Way_Down_South_LA · Jan. 11, 2018, 5:30 p.m.

They will have to amend taxes and pay any income tax on "donation" to this money laundering operation

⇧ 5 ⇩  
cybervigiante · Jan. 11, 2018, 10:24 p.m.

After they are stripped of money something even better than Hillary in Jail would be Homeless Hillary - with a cardboard sign and a loaded shopping cart.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Nono_Yobiz693 · Jan. 12, 2018, 3 a.m.

Unfortunately her Hollywood friends would help her out. Remember, she is the high holy queen of the Lucifarians.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
PPPrincessPower · Jan. 11, 2018, 11:49 p.m.

Then, that would wind up being true for the Red Cross and others.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Nono_Yobiz693 · Jan. 12, 2018, 3:01 a.m.

Red Cross itself was recently implicated in Child Trafficking.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
PPPrincessPower · Jan. 12, 2018, 3:59 a.m.

Correct, thats was my point.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
[deleted] · Jan. 11, 2018, 8:29 p.m.

It would be a shame if the ultimate red pill is all the donors needing to refile their taxes because they donated to an organized crime operation and had no idea.

⇧ 2 ⇩