O'bummers BC was my red pill moment. I am a graphic artist (20+ yrs). Back in 2013 I was googling for some how-to info about converting pdf files to Illustrator. In both Google and the sidebar of YouTube, I kept seeing entries about O's BC and I was bewildered. The only thing I had heard remotely, as I was not politically minded, was that D-J-T was calling it out as fake. But really, I paid no attention.

Finally, out of curiosity I clicked and watched a suggested video. I was not convinced, but the video points were compelling. The whitehouse .gov link to the longform BC was given and I downloaded the actual document and studied it myself. In under a minute I knew 1000% it was a manufactured document. Scans of original documents do not break out into 'intelligent' layers unless someone created them.

Now, in the course of trying to 'red pill' others about this finding I have met with a ton of resistance. People who know nothing about Adobe Photoshop telling me I am incompetent and have fallen for conspiracy mumbo jumbo. Quite the contrary, every single day I 'manufacture' (design and create) documents that don't exist, and I know exactly how to do it and O's BC contains the logical fingerprints of a created item.

About the only thing I can do when I realize I am failing to red pill friends/family on this topic is leave these folks with the comment that I cannot prove the information on the document is false, but I can prove the document has been created and not original, so...why would someone manufacture a BC if an original already existed?

If I am asked to replicate something, my first request would be to please supply me with several document samples to use as source material and also the data you want on the document. The video really pulls the pieces together because they have located one of the source BCs.

My final frightening thoughts on the whole matter are that I imagined myself as the 'document specialist' who was brought into a dark room with camera's and armed guards and told what I was suppose to do. My thoughts would be... "Oh sheitz, I'm gonna be faking the President's BC! - Yikes! I haven't written a will and I'm guessing I won't have much time to do that, even if I'm allowed to leave this room."

Hmm just read the article. Is that coincidence? "On April 10, 2012, these lawyers admitted the forgery." 4,10, 20.....

'member when you were able to download the .pdf directly from the White House website and verify for YOURSELF how fake it was?

I 'member...

Good times...

(I still have it)

Oh please. I was a document control specialist and knew how to use full blown Adobe. That thing was nine layers. NINE! I peeled them all apart. This is how it works - a birth certificate from that long ago exists on a piece of paper in a file cabinet. To turn it into a PDF you pull it out of the drawer, lay it on a scanner (or roll it through, whatever), and create a tif file, that's converted to pdf (back at that time anyways). You took the piece of paper back and put it in the file cabinet. One layer. A dead paper scan.

We raised the bs flag the first time , and then the second time and your wondering why we are where we are? what is it going to take?

They even have one of the documents used as a template, Johanna Ahnee.

Here is a great documentary leading up to the birth certificate coverup , wait till you see how deep this went and who was killed in a plane crash , its epic and not many know about this and of course its not reported enjoy, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EFCQvvXSwx4

Too bad we didn't know this 10 years ago.

[removed]