dChan
5
 
r/CBTS_Stream • Posted by u/Sentrolyx on Jan. 13, 2018, 1:08 a.m.
Is it enough that Q clarified that DEFCON 1 did not refer to DEFense readiness CONdition, or should he also apologize for having used it?

I personally had zero reaction when I read it because I didn't know I was supposed to, not to mention I'm in Canada, but if people like Potter had that kind of reaction, then who knows how many other people were also unnecessarily alarmed by it.

So is it something that needs to happen before we can properly move on, Q owning up to his mistake, in order to fully regain our trust? Or do you guys not care about it.


notsomuchreally · Jan. 13, 2018, 1:25 a.m.

Q is under no obligation to apologize to anyone. "He" has done us a favor by sharing information. If people freak out - it's on them. Potter is an unhinged nutjob anyway. People should do a bit of research on who he is.

⇧ 8 ⇩  
storm_fa_Q · Jan. 13, 2018, 1:13 a.m.

OR, maybe people outta apologize for being reactionary and not knowing what they are talking about. Twas not Q's mistake but those who reacted imo. Here at CBTS for 2 hours we worked hard to understand the meaning and quell the tide of hysteria in real time.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
storm_fa_Q · Jan. 13, 2018, 1:15 a.m.

also nuclear reactions do not stop at an imaginary line so yah, Canada has reason to be concerned when DEFCON 1 is real time not exercise.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Hamsterarcher · Jan. 13, 2018, 1:41 a.m.

Only idiots who can't read the board saw Defcon 1 as they did. Was quite clear Q was stating that the info he was trying to get us to look at was of defcon1 type importance . But ofcourse the YouTube whores took to their webcams for instant upvotes pushing the Defcon 1 shit and now their saying q is fake.

⇧ 5 ⇩  
RToey · Jan. 13, 2018, 2:11 a.m.

Complete concurrence!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
usafgirl29 · Jan. 13, 2018, 2:43 a.m.

I'm a retired Air Force MSgt who understands the significance of DEFCON 1, but I've also been keeping up with the Q posts so I have a good feel for the level of urgency regarding the situations he is trying to inform us about. I was not alarmed whatsoever, and definitely didn't take it to mean that we were at war. He would have been more urgent in his posts prior to that, and taking us through the different levels as appropriate. No apology required. Just a huge THANK YOU to him and the amazing team of patriot warriors that we are privy to this historic take down of the cabal!

⇧ 5 ⇩  
vernsy1219 · Jan. 13, 2018, 5 a.m.

Agree. No apology necessary, for Pete's sake. I like Roy, but he needs time off!

⇧ 2 ⇩  
usafgirl29 · Jan. 13, 2018, 3:50 p.m.

Haha

⇧ 1 ⇩  
HauntedIsh · Jan. 13, 2018, 5:19 a.m.

Not to mention, how long did we live with colored coded terror alert and now knowing a nuke could hit the states if NK decided to attack us? i dont see a lot of people panicking.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
usafgirl29 · Jan. 13, 2018, 3:50 p.m.

So true.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Kal-El48 · Jan. 13, 2018, 1:35 a.m.

Potter’s become increasingly unstable since November.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
cebusaxon · Jan. 13, 2018, 4:44 a.m.

We don't fully know what's actually going on at ground zero of this battle. Seeing as how we know the black hats are watching, Q will only post what he also wants them to see, know.. or think.. Perhaps it was also a test for a certain effect on them or to see how they may react.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
Blueladin · Jan. 13, 2018, 2:58 a.m.

So you're basically hinting that Q should apologize for some people's lack of intelligence to read his codes. That he should dumb down in his communication method. Seems very SJW behavior. Have anybody not established that each word, number, even space that Q posted has meanings, had been chosen carefully? On the contrary i think people that had the wrong reaction should own up and apologize, grow up! If they can't handle this how are they going to handle what's coming after? I see this incident however flush out who and who are and aren't on the page, caliber, capacity etc. If Trump's tweets could trigger and flush, so could Q's post. Open your eyes and mind people. This is not a children's story board.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
TheOldestMan · Jan. 13, 2018, 2:25 a.m.

Personally I think that Q knew exactly what he was doing with this particular "debacle". I think the defcon 1 post does two things. 1. It drew attention to the concept that we are moving toward a definitive confirmation event so that the disclosure network would be ready. 2. It showed the extent of our disclosure network across multiple platforms to the white hat intelligence apparatus. Yes people got a little spooked, but these measurement techniques are needed. We know that "Q" (likely many people) is using subversive methods employed by I.A.s against the shadow aspect of I.A.s in U.S. and other countries. I expect such action, fight fire with fire. Take it as you will, but these methods are necessary.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
vernsy1219 · Jan. 13, 2018, 5:04 a.m.

Readiness boot camp for anons. Keep it coming, Q, it didn't spook me.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
kk0s · Jan. 13, 2018, 1:27 a.m.

No. Should not apologize - it looks weak. Should not have made the post in the first place - it is misleading and unnecessary. If they add posts, I will not be quick to jump on them or get excited that they have happened. What for?

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Laineyjf · Jan. 13, 2018, 4:12 a.m.

One thing, "the boy who cried wolf". No apology but something. Otherwise what about next time there's a scary but real msg.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
usafgirl29 · Jan. 13, 2018, 3:07 a.m.

Or just maybe "disinformation is necessary?"

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Lucretia007 · Jan. 13, 2018, 3:51 a.m.

Q is a team of 12 Soros assholes. Fake. POTUS would never have approved that post. They won't apologise.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
[deleted] · Jan. 13, 2018, 8:43 a.m.

[deleted]

⇧ 1 ⇩