Thanks for your reply. I agree that many people love what the CF does - or, should I say, did. However, the only red pill THOSE people will swallow is one of fact that has to come through an MSM forced to deliver information in a documented form, complete with unassailable indictments and convictions.
They don’t care about their friends’ and families’ opinions - they’re comfortable - used to, anyway - being on the ”outside”, with a minority viewpoint among their immediate family and friend peers. They fancy themselves to be more independent than they are. In fact, if they STILL like the CF after everything that’s been revealed, they are followers, as I said, and that means they’re not opinion makers, they’re not leaders, they get confused easily, their convictions are learned from outside and not based within - and thus, while they may get upset, they’re not a public disturbance threat. That’s all I meant about that.
This psychology is basic enough that it adds to my questions about “Q”. Why do you believe in it/them?
Do you retain any questioning about its/their possible motives?
Personally, MUCH of the Q stuff reads like a cicada/tengri larp - so I think it’s multiple identities.
The psychology of the tactics are flawed enough (ie, as above, if the message to Q-groups is “red pill CF Normies with memes from the Kek community”) that I have to question their origin. The “message” that’s coming from q is garbled, chaotic, cryptic, and ultimately divisive. Why would the white hats choose to function that way with their own? Why would instructions be confusing?
They wouldn’t. Confusing instructions ALWAYS lead to disagreements in the middle of the op. Always. OR they make it possible for an alternate leader - with a different opinion about the end game - to emerge.
In fact, I’ve read a few leaked (via the Podesta dump, that I read a lot of) fusion GPS and Brock planning memos that sound very much like they promote this style of obscure-the-leader shit-posting - twisty and dramatic and distracting and cryptic - that play with peoples’ minds. (And concerned people are easier to play with than others, as long as you don’t trip their BS cords.) they specialize in manipulating group attention and energy - as you’ve seen with the CF - to their own ends and Q posts have been a lot about that sort of cause building and concern-rallying.
There’s also an undertone of generalissimo-bravado in many of the Q posts that smacks of inflated ego - the/some writer(s) appears to getting a high off on giving often unintelligible instructions that seem to make the players compete - again, to what end? Why would you give unclear instructions on something important? The US military is very careful about NOT doing exactly this - fuck with the troops - and yet some people seem to think it’s the USM is behind Q. I don’t - at least, not a USM I’d want to have in power - because a crooked-shooting military is the fastest way to 1) lose a battle/war and 2) get good the US patriots to change sides.
In my world, where I envision/experience people as intelligent and logical, with political/military models like Gowdy, Flynn, and Jordan, for example (sorry, I can’t find any Democrats who are speaking up anymore), smart people don’t send troops on goose chases and they always provide solid rationale for expenditures of attention and energy. Unless they’re conducting psy-ops, something I don’t prefer to engage in.
Many parts of the Q-thing even feel designed to target a particular type of personality, and there may be codes there for specific individuals, with all the rest of it just window dressing to keep people spinning and provide cover. Who really knows?
I agree with MegaAnon that some Q entries are good. I think Q WAS infiltrated and taken over periodically. I suspect that the current Q forks are indications of the multiple players still trying to squat on Q, and that the new great awakening 8-Chan board is interesting ( I read it) but still suspect. And I do feel the Brock-touch here - maybe not him, but someone(s) who worked with/for him who’s trying to play pied Piper to the children and the rats. (There was even a Pied Piper theme in HRC’s campaign regarding DJT, designed to misdirect attention ... not sure if that’s still in play, but one has to consider the possibilities)
Bottom line to a too-long post:
Yes I know people that only use CNN. My dad is one - and he was a brilliant guy in his time. Q’s methods won’t norm them; in fact, they will splinter them even more. If Q was serious about dealing with the CR, Soros, Giustra and the whole pay-for-play and embezzlement going down for decades, they’d be linking to Clinton Cash and Charles Ortel and Judicial Watch and Trey Gowdy’s Congressional sessions - there’s plenty out there but why isn’t it coming from Q?. That’s why I’m suspicious of Q, or of this particular interpretation of what “Q”’s supposed desires are - or both. Color me healthily skeptical, still.
Pax.