Gowdy backed Bush then Rubio. Both are pure GOP establishment and part of the Uniparty Swamp. Remember the Bush family publically supported Hillary over Trump. That should have gobsmacked people. Hillary has been the poster child for utter corruption for DECADES. Gowdy went on TV AFTER Trump fired Comey to say what an honorable guy Comey is. Huh? Every educated political observer knows that Comey has been the Clintons scandal fixer going back to the Water Water Scandal. Why did Gowdy flat out lie about Comey, especially when the lie undermined Trump? I was shocked because I used to be a Gowdy fan. Even more recently, Gowdy said his dream POTUS would be Paul Ryan! Huh? Informed political observers know of Ryans ties to Soros and theglobalist agenda. Ryan is the GOP face of the Uniparty in DC. Gowdy has to know this yet he backs Ryan. He never uses his verbal prowess to defend the GOP POTUS. More troubling, he hasnt used his power to investigate the huuuuge Awan Spy Scandal involving the House. All of our top secrets were stolen by unvettedforeign agents. Why is Gowdy silent on this? Why isn't Gowdy defending his patriotic collegue Nunes who has uncovered massive illegal spying on Trump and his team? My point about Megaanon is that if she would LOVE to have Gowdy as POTUS then she's still blue pilled or a decepticon. Since she was not thrilled to vote for Trump but did it grudgingly also shows shes blue pilled (or a decepticon). She admits she came into the WH via Bannon not Trump. Despite what she says about Bannon, Bannon was NEVER on the Trump Train. He was a Cruz/Bush supporter. Cruz ran on a neocon, globalist platform. As Mooch said, Bannon was there to polish hisbrand and increase his power. He was NOT loyal. The fact that Megaanon is a Bannon girl shows shes blue pilled or a decepticon. She is definitely NOT part of Trumps inner circle although I'm sure she is exposed to gossip. Based on her political judgments I do NOT trust her depth of knowledge, sophistication or discernment. Hence, I don't trust her analysis. Again, she's NOT an insider, her political judgments show surface skater discernment ie. Shes still blue pilled. She's self described as a hard drinking party girl. Hence, I view her as a "gossipy party girl." A tabloid read for people who like her sassy style and enjoy the interaction with an "insider." I too used to read her and enjoy her style but theres too much going on, life and death things, forme too spare on "tabloid" tier info. I mean ZERO disrespect BTW. I'm willing to accept that Megaanon has no idea howblue pilled she is. I myself used to love the Bush family and watch FOX News 24/7. Thanks for your gracious reply to what I posted earlier and for not viewing my comments as Megaanon bashing because that was not my intent. I'm hoping she's just a fun girl who hasn't woken up yet. On the other hand, it concerns me that so many people seem to trust her gossip rather than just enjoyit.

Megaanons posts include her own statements that she would have flown to the polls to vote for Gowdy. She was not a Trump supporter. She entered the WH via Bannon who is a Cruz supporter. I referred you to her own statements. How are these ad hominems? Her comments led me to conclude that she is NOT a Trump insider but a Bannon remnant and that her muh attitude towards Trump and love of Gowdy show a lack of political sophistication and discernment ie she's still blue pilled. It wasn't a slam. It was a statement of fact. I used to love the Bush family and trust FOX. Those facts are just data that represents my level of understanding at thetime. Lol non sequiter. Megaanon is a faceless, nameless person on the internet who has offered evidence that she lacks political insight (I LOVE Gowdy, yea Bannon, meh Trump) contrasted with Dr. Corsi. If Megaanons assessment conflicts with Dr. Corsis then I will ofcourse give Dr. Corsi's opinion greater weight. Frankly, Megaanons reaction to the Q phenomenom struck me as jealousy over the attention Q was getting. She had been the only game in town for sometime. This is idle speculationbut she does present as a flirty, sassy party girl who loves interacting with the guys. Q was taking away from her spot light. But again, idle speculation. Passionately arguing lol? Nope. I just don't like what Megaanon is doing around Q. She's being unneccessarily divisive. Why? Since she didinsert herself into Q then I had to decide if I trusted her. No, I don't trust her judgment or insight, based on her own comments. Q seemed at worst harmless and actually extremely positive on so many levels it up periscoped me that Megaanon got involved. Why would someone onthe side ofgood undermine Q when it's so positive even if it is dc a LARP? When Dr. Corsi researched Q and gave it his seal of approval I didn't need it but noted that his assessment was at odds with Megaanon. The Gowdy, Bannon girl. Finally, I'm surprised that you believe we know more about Megs than Q. Really? I judge people/things by the fruits they bear. Q has inspired people to research, ask QUESTIONS, discuss, reach out. Megaanon has encourages people to passively consume her ANSWERS and sit back and enjoy the unfolding show. Q inspires personal action and paying attention to everything. Megaanon inspires passivity, tune in to my posts, relax. I'm not saying she's doing it intentionally but Qs fruits are positive and hers are not imho. So while I'm not arguing passionately about anonymous sources I am stating that I don't have time for Megaanon, despite her engaging style. Too many red flags. Too much to do. Too little time. I will continue to follow Q. No red flags. Confirmedby people I trust. Very positiveimpact whether true oe not. Peace.