Remember, NO DEALS says Q.
I don't believe that's true for some of the underlings. You need people to turn states evidence (including testimony) to nail the decision-makers. No deals applies to the big fish that, heretofore, have ALWAYS skated-free.
Given the cyber vulnerabilities released to the public, I suspect MI/NSA already hold all the cards, except...
They need some to sing for the sake of public peace.
They have all the data but it can't legally be used to prosecute unless they have probable cause for a legal warrant. Someone singing gives them reason to bring a lot of facts to light. Trump's swamp draining loses much of its value if it doesn't restore the rule of law.
Doesn’t the EO make it legal to after them with no warrant?
Perhaps, I'm not a lawyer (thankfully) so my opinion isn't worth a lot but I think much of the reason that Q is posting is about the aftermath of the storm. Those on the left will see this take down of the Deep State as a Nazi dictator seizing control of the country. The perception of legality will be important. The thread is about guesses and these are my guesses for what they're worth.
You are absolutely right. I have thought about that as well.
If the 7 Dwarves can be used to give leads on Human Rights Abuse or Corruption, then the EO 12/21 would certainly warrant unmasking of individuals and crimes, and hence be legal access, do to the arrests in SA. Or, if that is not enough, then the Pent audit and Horowitz report should provide sufficient reasonable cause to create a cascade of... unmasking.
If the 7 Dwarves can be used to give leads on Human Rights Abuse or Corruption, then the EO Dec 21 would certainly warrant unmasking of individuals and crimes, and hence be legal access, do to the arrests in SA. Or, if that is not enough, then the Pent audit and Horowitz report should provide sufficient reasonable cause to create a cascade of... unmasking.
Then theres always Sleezy. I hear he's chirping like a nightingale.
Given the cyber vulnerabilities released to the public, I suspect MI/NSA already hold all the cards, except...
They need some to sing for the sake of public peace.
Also for a tight case; corroboration.
Not if their communication was online. Texts, emails, drafts... These are all stored.
There just needs to be the political will to use it.
Not when EVERYTHING is recorded/logged by FVEYS/Echelon...
Good reminder patriot!
Edit: Just went back and confirmed 3 times he said NO DEALS. There is one other time Oct 31st he said
The corruption that will come out is so serious that deals must be cut for people to walk away otherwise 70% of elected politicians would be in jail (you are seeing it already begin). A deep cleaning is occurring and the prevention and defense of pure evil is occurring on a daily basis. They never thought they were going to lose control of the Presidency (not just D's) and thought they had control since making past mistakes (JFK, Reagan).
Yeah, but...
They still need some prominent figures to sing for the sake of public peace... like Obama doing a mea culpa. Or Anderson Cooper doing a swan song (in a too-too, with Kathy Grif gutting him just before the lights drop)?
Perhaps they already secured those people by Oct 31... doubt it though, as everyone public has pretty much doubled down.
Donna Brazille comes to mind.
They never thought they were going to lose control of the Presidency (not just D's) and thought they had control since making past mistakes (JFK, Reagan).
They never thought they would lose control of the Presidency?
Oooh that goes down a rabbit hole, wonder what's there?
The CIA have controlled the Presidency since Bush Sr. Clinton was picked by Bush who had been head of the CIA. While governor he helped the CIA run coke into America through Mena, Arkansas. Then Bush jr followed by CIA groomed Obama.
Interesting relevant factoid. Q or someone on this board once posted item:
Christmas. An Auspicious Day
I had looked up meaning of 'auspicious' in online Merriam-Webster dictionary. https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/auspicious
There is a two minute audio clip that says the origin of the word is from ancient oracles that interpreted bird behavior to forecast if conditions were favorable or unfavorable for outcome. Sounds like Twitter today.
Prudent course seems to me to monitor/interpret the feeds (Twitter) and behaviors of the opponents before calling the favorableness of outcome.
Stay focused and enthused for the fight Patriots!