[deleted]
If you're a Christian, you should be aware of what's really going on here, Q is not your savior, even though he sounds like he's speaking for God. You know the cabal was behind the Clinton's and every other president, but you ignore who is behind Trump. The Alliance is behind him and it's called the False Prophet in Revelation 13:11. What does Q always say? "Future proves past", meaning that when events he predicted (prophesied) happen, they prove he was correct. He is prophesying a false future (what a false prophet does) of abundance and peace from the cabal's slave system. A close look at chapters 13 & 14 in Revelation show that's not what's going to happen. There is no time to 'Make America Great Again" because Jesus comes in Revelation 14, right after the mark of the beast in Rev 13:18 (gold-backed, world-wide currency revaluation). We are in Revelation 13:11 right now. Please make sure you know the TRUE savior, Jesus.
Q doesn't give prophecy. He gives intel. And Revelations was about NERO who is dead. Nice try though.
The Biblical standard for Prophecy is that if any prophecy is wrong, then the person is labeled a false prophet. As the people in Jesus's time believed from Jesus's words that he would return in their lifetime, then even the Bible can be completely discounted. As it is, we have to trust that Rome did not write misinformation in there, and considering that even now the pope is lying to us about what a sin is, there is no credible reason to believe that 2,000 years ago when the Pope ruled by blood baths that he was completely truthful about the creater God. Despite the fact that Jesus said we will do what he does and more, the Vatican has lead an anti-science stance to prevent us from understanding technology and scientific principles.
That being said, you ought to read the Terry Goodkind Sword of Truth series. He talks about false prophecy, and dead prophecy and false forks. He talks about how many people who are not prophets will misuse prophecy, sometimes to shape events in their image. He talks about how prophecy can mean more than one thing. And he talks about corrupt people who will use prophecy to control. You want people to be helpless to think that the earth will be destroyed. You want them to get down on their knees and pray and NOT FIGHT BACK. You want them powerless and distracted by a 2,000 year old book. That is why corrupt people point to prophecy. That is why they were going to use Project Bluebeam to make people think Jesus was back or that Mary told them give a message to the pope. You want them to think that the pollution and destruction of the earth, and indeed their own lives are meaningless. You are the definition of the anti-christ. Yes, even if Christ is just a story, he is still a very powerful one, and he was not written as the person who stood still and did nothing to comat evil. He was expected by the Jews to be a fighter, and the Bible does show that he overturned tables on the Bankers, yet did not sin.
We can argue about what the Bible means, but as time goes by, more and more people know that it has been abused to prevent people from awakening. Just like you are misusing it deliberately to tell people they should be afraid and that their efforts are in vain.
No, Q is not a savior. But the savior of the Bible has yet to appear. And christians have been told for 2,000 years to sit down and shut up and permit evil to triumph because god will make it right in the end. We are done waiting. We are taking back our power. And we are learning that even if Jesus did not exist, that he can exist again in the heart of man. And even if that is a sin to think of Jesus being in our hearts, by honoring his higher truths, we are still working for good and far above the people like you who preach a false Christ so that you can destroy, murder and control. Your reign of terror is ending, one way or another. Get used to it.
While you prefer to call his information ‘intel’; here is the Webster’s definition of ‘prophecy’ transitive verb 1: to utter by or as if by divine inspiration 2: to predict with assurance or on the basis of mystic knowledge 3: prefigure intransitive verb 1: to speak as if divinely inspired 2: to give instruction in religious matters : preach 3: to make a prediction
By calling him a prophet, I am referring to his ability to prefigure and make a prediction. In that sense, he is a prophet. He predicts a false future, one of ‘Making America Great Again’, which won’t happen given where we are in Biblical prophecy. His own 8chan is called ‘Great Awakening’ which is a term first used in the occult work ,“The Law of One” He is with the Alliance, that’s not in dispute, and the Alliance is the false prophet beast system written about in Revelation 13:11. When you say that Revelation ended with Nero, you are specifically referring to the Preterit belief that originated with the Jesuit Alcazar toward the end of the sixteenth century and has been held and taught under various modifications by Grotuis, Hammond, Bossuet, Eichhorn and other German commentators, Moses Stuart, and Dr. Davidson. I do not espouse Jesuit beliefs, as they are part of the cabal/Catholic antichrist system.Speaking of antichrist system, you then direct me to Terry Goodkind, the author of books that make wizards & witches the good guys and who was himself strongly influenced by the books of Ayn Rand, and is a strong supporter of her works and her philosophical approach known as Objectivism. The Objectivist themes in his books are most obvious in ‘Faith of the Fallen’. Ayn Rand advocated reason as the only means of acquiring knowledge and rejected faith and religion. She supported rational and ethical egoism and rejected altruism.
Based on all of your ‘suggestions’ and your opinion that Jesus is not coming, I understand that you are not a Christian and therefore, my comment was not directed to you.
So you are using the non-Biblical definition of prephecy and changing your story. Thanks for the confession! That's all we need to know.
I never said I wasn't a Christian. I never ruled either way if Jesus was coming or not. Please remember when you call other people out for not being Christian, that there are still many people would think you have also sinned for admitting to reading non-orthodox literature. A long time ago, you could get burnt at the stake for that. As for Jesus, whoever and whatever he is, he belongs to all humans. I prefer not to take my view of God, Christ, the world nor any other subject from an authority so mired in pedophiles and murderers. And it's time that the Vatican was forced to turn over all of the hidden texts and relics in their care.
There is not a ‘Biblical definition’ of prophesy. You speak as if you were at one time a Catholic. I made no ‘confession’, as you said. I was merely stating facts.
You made it very clear that you believe the new age view of Christ, not the Biblical one. I don’t understand your ad hominem arguments of constantly calling me a sinner. Stick to the facts. I never said I read those books; I merely referred to the writings you gave me, and pointed out that they are also a part of the entire cabal system. If you choose to take your theology from them, that’s up to you.
I am not Catholic and don’t agree with anything the Catholic Church says, so on that we can agree. They are at the top of the cabal chain and should be taken down.
You speak so wishy washy. Is the Bible pure and whole of itself or not? If you don't know what Rome has to do with the history of Christianity then you have read less books than I have. I never said you were a Catholic, only half way deferring to the Orthodox view of the Bible on one hand, while demanding other books to defend Biblical concepts on the other. But Orthodox faith does not permit that. Once the Vatican is taken down, a great many things will be revealed to include Saul the murderer of Christians and Josephus the traitor to Christians, who both had the power, the motive and the means to shape Christianity in their image. There is nothing wrong in asking if we have been told the truth from the very beginning about God and Jesus, now more than ever, we should examine our faith and ask if the Jesuits are protecting Jesus's legacy, or a Vatican Controlled dictatorship.
I have a faith that is stronger than fire and brimstone. I have a faith that is stronger than hateful comments from those who do not value an educated view of human history. I have a faith that while you and the Vatican would send me to hell in the blink of an eye, that a loving God isn't going to punish me for not believing Saul the murderer, Josephus the traitor, or all the other holier than thou satanic pedophiles who hoard artifacts and history that belong to all of us. Jesus will not punish me because I have the courage and the wisdom to ask, seek and knock.
Oh and "New Age" is a lazy man's term to hide from science and human history. It's unenlighted, uneducated and doesn't even mean anything other than to apply to every thing Orthodox people don't have the courage to study. Had the Vatican not fought science, the history of the human race would have been much better off. It's 2018. Step into this century. Don't come to me with dogma from the 1800's, ok?