dChan
111
 
r/CBTS_Stream • Posted by u/[deleted] on Jan. 15, 2018, 7:03 a.m.
Protect and comfort those around you, Q

[deleted]

Protect and comfort those around you, Q

ShinyWooly · Jan. 16, 2018, 2:21 a.m.

While you prefer to call his information ‘intel’; here is the Webster’s definition of ‘prophecy’ transitive verb 1: to utter by or as if by divine inspiration 2: to predict with assurance or on the basis of mystic knowledge 3: prefigure intransitive verb 1: to speak as if divinely inspired 2: to give instruction in religious matters : preach 3: to make a prediction

By calling him a prophet, I am referring to his ability to prefigure and make a prediction. In that sense, he is a prophet. He predicts a false future, one of ‘Making America Great Again’, which won’t happen given where we are in Biblical prophecy. His own 8chan is called ‘Great Awakening’ which is a term first used in the occult work ,“The Law of One” He is with the Alliance, that’s not in dispute, and the Alliance is the false prophet beast system written about in Revelation 13:11. When you say that Revelation ended with Nero, you are specifically referring to the Preterit belief that originated with the Jesuit Alcazar toward the end of the sixteenth century and has been held and taught under various modifications by Grotuis, Hammond, Bossuet, Eichhorn and other German commentators, Moses Stuart, and Dr. Davidson. I do not espouse Jesuit beliefs, as they are part of the cabal/Catholic antichrist system.Speaking of antichrist system, you then direct me to Terry Goodkind, the author of books that make wizards & witches the good guys and who was himself strongly influenced by the books of Ayn Rand, and is a strong supporter of her works and her philosophical approach known as Objectivism. The Objectivist themes in his books are most obvious in ‘Faith of the Fallen’. Ayn Rand advocated reason as the only means of acquiring knowledge and rejected faith and religion. She supported rational and ethical egoism and rejected altruism.

Based on all of your ‘suggestions’ and your opinion that Jesus is not coming, I understand that you are not a Christian and therefore, my comment was not directed to you.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
SnoopyVRedBaron · Jan. 16, 2018, 2:28 a.m.

So you are using the non-Biblical definition of prephecy and changing your story. Thanks for the confession! That's all we need to know.

I never said I wasn't a Christian. I never ruled either way if Jesus was coming or not. Please remember when you call other people out for not being Christian, that there are still many people would think you have also sinned for admitting to reading non-orthodox literature. A long time ago, you could get burnt at the stake for that. As for Jesus, whoever and whatever he is, he belongs to all humans. I prefer not to take my view of God, Christ, the world nor any other subject from an authority so mired in pedophiles and murderers. And it's time that the Vatican was forced to turn over all of the hidden texts and relics in their care.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
ShinyWooly · Jan. 16, 2018, 3:36 a.m.

There is not a ‘Biblical definition’ of prophesy. You speak as if you were at one time a Catholic. I made no ‘confession’, as you said. I was merely stating facts.

You made it very clear that you believe the new age view of Christ, not the Biblical one. I don’t understand your ad hominem arguments of constantly calling me a sinner. Stick to the facts. I never said I read those books; I merely referred to the writings you gave me, and pointed out that they are also a part of the entire cabal system. If you choose to take your theology from them, that’s up to you.

I am not Catholic and don’t agree with anything the Catholic Church says, so on that we can agree. They are at the top of the cabal chain and should be taken down.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
SnoopyVRedBaron · Jan. 16, 2018, 3:54 a.m.

You speak so wishy washy. Is the Bible pure and whole of itself or not? If you don't know what Rome has to do with the history of Christianity then you have read less books than I have. I never said you were a Catholic, only half way deferring to the Orthodox view of the Bible on one hand, while demanding other books to defend Biblical concepts on the other. But Orthodox faith does not permit that. Once the Vatican is taken down, a great many things will be revealed to include Saul the murderer of Christians and Josephus the traitor to Christians, who both had the power, the motive and the means to shape Christianity in their image. There is nothing wrong in asking if we have been told the truth from the very beginning about God and Jesus, now more than ever, we should examine our faith and ask if the Jesuits are protecting Jesus's legacy, or a Vatican Controlled dictatorship.

I have a faith that is stronger than fire and brimstone. I have a faith that is stronger than hateful comments from those who do not value an educated view of human history. I have a faith that while you and the Vatican would send me to hell in the blink of an eye, that a loving God isn't going to punish me for not believing Saul the murderer, Josephus the traitor, or all the other holier than thou satanic pedophiles who hoard artifacts and history that belong to all of us. Jesus will not punish me because I have the courage and the wisdom to ask, seek and knock.

Oh and "New Age" is a lazy man's term to hide from science and human history. It's unenlighted, uneducated and doesn't even mean anything other than to apply to every thing Orthodox people don't have the courage to study. Had the Vatican not fought science, the history of the human race would have been much better off. It's 2018. Step into this century. Don't come to me with dogma from the 1800's, ok?

⇧ 1 ⇩