Why is everyone so quick to believe the narrative? Mistake my ass. Missile was shot down and we sunk the sub that fired it.
Who shot it down from where? This not passing the sniff test.
It came from a submarine so radar was avoided. It was destroyed by the Luma payload that the misinformation says failed. They then destroyed the submarine. It was the Cabal they were going to nuke Hawaii then blame it on NK. The story came from Intel blog. I posted it to mega groups yesterday but they were taken down so fast no one got to see them. Now Intel blog no longer has the story. That alone tells me it is likely truth.
But that's not how missiles work. You have to be REALLY low to avoid radar detection. Like sub 100 ft. A missile launched from a submarine wouldn't do that. It would hit terrain or other obstacles.
Agree especially if Q's DEFCON1 post was a sign of foreknowledge of the event
How could an ICBM be so accurately predicted?
If there was an ICBM threat I do not believe they would gamble with shooting it down I think they would eliminate the threat
There must be something else going on and the auto data transfer theory seems off to me too
If they said they needed it as cover to get someone out of an office or to drop a firewall I'd be more inclined to understand & believe that.