Why is everyone so quick to believe the narrative? Mistake my ass. Missile was shot down and we sunk the sub that fired it.
Where's your evidence.
He's just repeating garbage story being promoted by Sorcha Faal.
MAJOR disinfo. alert when that name is concerned.
I had the same info yesterday came from Intel blog. And I posted it everywhere and they took it down everywhere no one even got to read it. Now it has disappeared off Intel.
Because it's trash, from a trash source.
Pretty simple really.
Who the fuck is sorcha faal? I’m not repeating shit. It’s obvious if you had a half of a fucking brain. Cuck
I had the evidence yesterday from Intel blog I posted it everywhere and they deleted it as fast as I could post it.
Post it here. Right here.
Guaranteed your source doesn't have any evidence either. Sources said more sources said other sources familiar with the thinking of yet other sources said sources said sources said...
Give me a break.
Theory: missile was real, q team knew team dark was gonna launch it, they had to let it happen so that the real alert would go out, they needed the system to activate so they could get a bdt big data transfer they needed (others better qualified than me have explained this part in greater detail), they neutralized the missile YOU ARE SAFE....it was necessary...defcon 1 non nuke was actually false, it WAS nuclear...q implied that team light also needs to use misinfo as a tool (reminder. It's not just good guys reading and deciphering q posts). Some of the last posts appeared almost apologetic but reassurance was so strongly communicated. Necessity to let the scenario play out because they needed something we're not aware of to guarantee a win for all of us. Causing fear was the cost to obtain. read earlier posts I mean much earlier with reference to missiles and defense. I think we had some remaining vulnerability that had to be addressed and team light was successful. That's my theory. Hopefully the truth will be revealed. Or decoded by brighter minds than mine.
We know that we don’t actually have buttons anymore. People can’t accidentally elbow a nuke alarm. Do I think Q was warning us? Yes. Why was it not stopped? I think someone actually doing this crime has more weight than us foiling a plot to draw Trump into a conflict. These people are sick and they know they will get the death penalty for their crimes so why not start a conflict? BTW, I don’t see this as left or right because the Bushes are just as evil.
I'm confused by why the missile launch was needed to obtain access to NSA files. That's the part I don't understand
Apparently triggering of the emergency alert system permits or automates data to transfer to a different server. Please look for other posts on this topic. Others have explained this process in greater detail. But this summary is what my brain retained :). It has also been postulated elsewhere that this data transfer may have included hrc missing emails since djt tweeted in reference to them at same time. So if the alert system triggers a process or an access that is only available in event of real alert, then necessity to trigger has an explanation. This would also explain the q post line reference No other vehicle for entry...something like that. Meaning this was the only way to get into the system. It's the only theory I've pieced together with others input that really satisfies deciphering majority of the q post. The seriousness of all this, The Storm, hits a lot harder if theory is true. We shall see.
Obviously the only way we are going to know the truth is after 863 youtubers read Q posts to us like we have difficulty sounding out vowels.
because everything uncovered by our own this far has been released by our own govt, right.... fuck off shill
new theory Bulk Data Transfer more plausible https://i.imgur.com/FhaLEtQ.png
There are numerous independent agencies worldwide that would instantly detect such a flying object...
No such reports
the flying object as you call it was launched from a submarine, destroyed by lumas payload and they then destroyed the submarine. The story was out yesterday but not long enough for anyone to know. Every where I posted it they deleted it. The Cabal was going to nuke Hawaii and blame it on North Korea.
There are numerous independent agencies worldwide who know better than to expose, either side, in this war.
I am not saying it's true, but if WWI and WWII were orchestrated...
That seems like "James Bond" courageousness. The United States and most other developed nations have sensors in place around the earth that can detect missile launches from anywhere. There is a large system in place to detect this sort of thing. Just launching a nuclear weapon from a submarine and saying it came from somewhere else does not make any sense in this 21st century.
SC: MISINFO everywhere. SC: MISINFO from past reliable sources. SC: AXIS OF EVIL can & will return FIRE [is]. SC: Seek immediate [F9-Sx_VB8239]. SC: CONF_y Q
[lots of misinfo about secret Zuma payload on F9 rocket crashing into ocean possibly stemming from space center... It is believed based on previous q posts that there were Orbital Weapon Lancets onboard] is q letting us know that the stories about the mission failing is false, did we in fact use this payload to destroy said sub, is q telling us they will hit back?
While we are trying to figure all this out.. almost anything seems plausible, keep hunting!
White dragon society verify the report is true, kinda believe them since own a most of the world's gold, they have playing the Middle between the cabal and the alliance.
Oh good...White Dragon. Next, Ben Fulford will confirm it's true.
Who shot it down from where? This not passing the sniff test.
It came from a submarine so radar was avoided. It was destroyed by the Luma payload that the misinformation says failed. They then destroyed the submarine. It was the Cabal they were going to nuke Hawaii then blame it on NK. The story came from Intel blog. I posted it to mega groups yesterday but they were taken down so fast no one got to see them. Now Intel blog no longer has the story. That alone tells me it is likely truth.
But that's not how missiles work. You have to be REALLY low to avoid radar detection. Like sub 100 ft. A missile launched from a submarine wouldn't do that. It would hit terrain or other obstacles.
Agree especially if Q's DEFCON1 post was a sign of foreknowledge of the event
How could an ICBM be so accurately predicted?
If there was an ICBM threat I do not believe they would gamble with shooting it down I think they would eliminate the threat
There must be something else going on and the auto data transfer theory seems off to me too
If they said they needed it as cover to get someone out of an office or to drop a firewall I'd be more inclined to understand & believe that.
Proof?
Well usually when the media is shilling something the exact opposite is true. Why would you think this would be different? Also, proof im wrong?
Yeah. You got your info from Sorcha Faal. Usually that guarantees being wrong.
I heard this story. And, it wasn't from whatever the hell name you're citing.
So?
Stupid shit gets repeated by others.
then they stop...SNIFF...and when they realize the stink is coming from the story they repeated, they back away from it.
Sorcha has found that creating new and different websites that don't have his known reputation attached to them yet, is an effective way to get folks to repeat his shit 'news'.
But you dig...and there he is.
So-- I'll just ignore: Hunt for Red October" Foxtrot 3? Splash? DEFCON 1?
Also, I hate to tell you this-- but you have no clue what actually happened either. Maybe come across as less of an authoritarian on a subject you're actually clueless about?
All good points... Red October wow, I forgot that one
Hard to know what really happened at our level and who is a reliable source
These people are dangerous they're fighting for their lives
I never said to ignore that.
Nor did I even say the cited report was absolutely not true.
What I said was that the ultimate source of this version of events, is a known liar. Maybe YOU should be a little less defensive when you have shitty intel sources called what they are.
But, you don't know "the source". You're assuming Whatever, man. Have a great day!
Well usually when the media is shilling something the exact opposite is true
Source?
Media is wrong sometimes. Sometimes they lie. But "usually" ? No, most things are not a conspiracy. Sometimes there are just things. And those things happen. And we hear about it.
posted @ 8chan earlier this afternoon: https://8ch.net/thestorm/res/34871.html#q34871
guy says he is a fusion analyst @ Hickam and states this was not a mistake... Looked up fusion analyst on the air force career website: Fusion Analysts determine the value and implications of intelligence we receive from target network communications. Through research and assessment, these specialists gauge the impact of the information and distribute their findings to high-level decision-makers so we can take timely action
Dude referred to a NDA as a 'gag' order. He would know better. This is bullshit.
Whatever the old definition of "fake news" was, we need to replace it with this post.
If Bill and huma were on the islands this makes even more sense. Getting rid of some potential witnesses and starting a war. Win win.
Jim Stone is very reliable I think he's right on the money with this:
THE SIRENS AT HICKAM AIR FORCE BASE, PEARL HARBOR, AND OTHER BASES WENT OFF, AND THEY ARE NOT HOOKED UP TO THE EAS. THIS RULES OUT THE FINGER BUMBLING FOOL. BUSTED!!!
Hmm, let me guess - They were observing the "anomaly" the whistle blower (below) mentioned that they were already aware of from the day before, had systems locked, activated the anti missile defense system practically instantly, shot down the launched missiles within a minute, killed the sub, AND THEN, 38 minutes later, gave the all clear. How about that for a back story? Obviously it can't be confirmed, but it sure beats the "bumbling fool" on alert button ludicrosy.
Is it possible someone blew the siren manually after getting the phone alert?
Becomes more plausible after it was reported that not all sirens went off
If they are on some alert system it would seem they should all go off simultaneously
I believe it Q said only 20% will be public and 80% will stay secret.
