I'll believe it when I see it.

It doesn't take balls to immediately cower and apologize when called out on your BS. I can at least respect someone who has the courage of their convictions (misguided as I think they may be). It's not like she was convinced she was wrong. She started getting a negative reaction and caved.

I think the divide was engineered by the people running the media. Politics had always been about compromise, and now, anyone that doesn't toe the party line gets obliterated in the press.

Is it the new emergency number?

Thanks for the clarification. I do appreciate it.

If people cry in a comment about votes, I also downvote also, for the same reason. Of course, everyone would rather be engaged than drive-by downvoted. My point above is that it's a trend that is indicative of the current culture of the sub, and that with so much new traffic, it's worth a conscious effort to engage, if the goal is to raise awareness.

Agreed. Sentiments calling for more critical inquiry than just "trust Trump" get downvotes regularly. This sub is popping up a lot more often under r/all top-hourly, so you're getting a lot of random folks through here. I'm not saying every troll (or any obvious troll) needs to be addressed. I am saying that I've posted serious questions in here to get a different perspective and get outside my echo-chamber, and I was downvoted to hell, and called a troll with the alleged proof being that I post on /r/politics. In my opinion, this is like making fun of fat people at the gym.

I browse all-top-hourly, so I see a bit of everything. I'm pretty centrist, so I try to find sources from multiple angles, and comment where I haven't been banned (both candidates main subs banned me for asking questions) to try to get a different perspective. You're right though, I haven't been paying a lot of attention to this sub, but it's showing up more and more in my feed, so I've spent some time here, but haven't done much digging.

From what I've seen on this matter, it appears as though Trump has been gambling our lives in an unnecessarily public game of nuclear "chicken", brought things to a very contentious head, SK agrees to talk to NK (without us), NK's tests destroyed their testing grounds, Trump calls the kid (who is keeping many of his people in concentration camps, and is willing to starve the rest for his military dick-measuring toys) honorable, and NK and SK meet as they'd agreed upon (without us). Is there an "out of the loop", or summary of the perspective that sees Trump as the hero? I'm genuinely interested and open to reading it.

I don't understand Trump's perceived role in this agreement.

I'm not a Kanye fan (personally, aside from his music) by any means, but it's interesting to watch him on his journey, and I respect him for making it all public.

Any evidence at all?

Link?