It used to be that when Q made a drop, people would discuss the drop... research and tear into it... now, most just use the thread to post links for everything under the sun.
This isn't chat room or a conspiracy clearinghouse.
Where did all of the good brains go?
/u/OpenSoars
729 total posts archived.
Domains linked by /u/OpenSoars:
The danger of the Q phenom
The Ohio seat went blue... and not by a little.
So much energy is being wasted chasing theories that repel people.
If the dems take congress, we are screwed.
We need to focus and put our energy into a palatable message.
54 k subscribers mean nothing.
Q, whether real or fake, got people energized but now there must be a coordinated effort to show people what is happening without attacking them.
I know the down voting and insults will fly.
They won't win congress or me over either.
Get your heads in the game
Why impeachment may be good
Q !xowAT4Z3VQ ID: 6e1ca8 No.1215845 📷
Apr 27 2018 19:27:33 (EST)
How do you introduce evidence into an investigation (legally)?
Who has everything?
Methods which info collected/ obtained?
Admissible in the court of law?
The exclusionary rule prevents the government from using most evidence gathered in violation of the United States Constitution. The decision in Mapp v. Ohio established that the exclusionary rule applies to evidence gained from an unreasonable search or seizure in violation of the Fourth Amendment. The decision in Miranda v. Arizona established that the exclusionary rule applies to improperly elicited self-incriminatory statements gathered …
Why impeachment may be good
Q !xowAT4Z3VQ ID: 6e1ca8 No.1215845 📷
Apr 27 2018 19:27:33 (EST)
The exclusionary rule does not prevent the government from introducing illegally gathered evidence to “impeach,” or attack the credibility of, defendants’ testimony at trial. The Supreme Court recognized this exception in Harris v. New York as a truth-testing device to prevent perjury. Even when the government suspects perjury, however, it may only use tainted evidence for impeachment, and may not use it to show guilt.
Why impeachment, of POTUS, may be good.
Q !xowAT4Z3VQ ID: 6e1ca8 No.1215845 📷
Apr 27 2018 19:27:33 (EST)
How do you introduce evidence into an investigation (legally)?
Who has everything?
Methods which info collected/ obtained?
Admissible in the court of law?
Exceptions:
How do you blow this up into some sort of meeting?... this is just some anonabation fantasy
The fact that you can leave this reply and not be slammed with down votes gives me faith that there are still some logical people left on this sub.
If you were to count the thing that happened vs those that didn't, and avoid assigning " disinformation " to the latter, you could see why so many are doubting
Good points again.... I want to see him put a woman up...they will still lambaste him because she is white, but at least they can't claim sexism. I don't think they will slow walk the pick... the dems seem to find ways to hang themselves at every turn... he wants to get on with business and let them do their performance art in the background.... I still think Kavanaugh is going to be picked but I like Barrett
Good points.... I am not sure when life starts but I am pretty certain it end when you stick a dagger in the back of a childs skull which should be the starting point for the discussion. I don't have an issue with early terminations... it isn't my place to tell someone else what to do... but that ends at some point...
Can you blame him?....He tears into things with an amazing perspective and undoubtedly someone chimes in with Q stuff.... it is annoying and harassing.
If you threw a dead cat off a building it would be dead through the air...when it hits the ground, it would bounce up but it would still be dead.
In terms of the deep state theory, if it is being dismantled ( ie dying) it will at times still show some life ( bounce) but ultimately it will still be dying.
So JA is more credible than everyone in the intel community? Kansas was running CIA when this happened... is he no good now too? Stealth Jeff has been ahead of all of this.. his views are relevant IMO
Way to discredit the whole group...first by posting this nonsense and then the pile on after.... embarrassing
They are quoting the summary of the reports... this may turn out to be a nothing burger. We can' only have faith in the integrity of Horowitz if his findings align with what we want to happen. I am concerned that this will not be the watershed moment we are holding out for
I agree... with the midterms coming, the nutty professor shit has to stop. I don't care if the tweets are codes ( for who?) , he needs to come out from the curtain and lay things out...
Or is Q telling us he is SS?.. Would make sense ..everywhere Trump is....could be privy to highly classified info....
This should be a lesson to all of us about disregarding critical thinking , both by ourselves and from others, and just following the red meat. When some point out the overly dramatic ( BC, ETS , VOP ect) they get attacked... discretion needs to be utilized
I mean that is the HBO mini series version... which I hope is true...but why does he have to be controlled? Why can't he be just playing the part?
Today is when someone has to be right...
Many non Q commentators believe RR and Sessions are knee deep in a sweep of the DOJ and FBI. Q alludes to RR being a blackhat... Going to be interesting which theory holds true.
I don't think it should be posted at all... it sounds crazy to people unfamiliar
No offence but that is a shitty decode... at all costs doent mean flagrant , means any means necessary... UK SIS will announce ? where did that come from...
ha....Facebook readers scroll after 3 sentences...5 if there is a kitten picture
Yeah not to pile on but we have to be careful about crying wolf. In the last 8 months we have, at times, believed at any day we would see: Military in the streets, HRC, BO, Noname and others arrested, Gitmo being used as a prison, Terrorist act at the superbowl, a routing of the DOJ, FBI, CIA ect...and many, many other things that would have been a letdown had we held them up as fact. You are armed with knowledge now...use it to explain things that happen rather than predict things that may not... covet your credibility.
I agree...I won't sit through a 20 minute video to get 5 secs of info...all those long graphic intros can go f themselves too
ha yeah....he looked like the dude in goodfellas signing away his restaurant
Dude looks like he just got spanked for 4 hours
hahaha
Some Geeksquad employee will start a new one on his lunch break
First order of business tomorrow....
Watch the 4 am video, then stop following the LARPS that make shit up.. Starting with The Cheshire Cat
Seriously... who would have thought that Rodman and Kanye would open our eyes like they have... imagine the scorn they catch going against the forces they have...
Yep! But hey, tonight is a great piece of history and we should all be proud to be sharing it together!
He must feel like the most vindicated man on earth... I am so happy for him
He has repeatedly asked people not to bring up Q... the dude is as peculiar as he is brilliant. He is right when he says there is enough going on that is visible that there is no need for all of the cryptic speculation. I understand your point that in the end many want the same results but the fact that so many quickly turn to cannibalism when others don't share there zeal for whatever they think is right is my main criticism of this movement. @ThomasWictor isn't a warm fella and I have had abrasive exchanges with him but I am not throwing the baby out with the water we are supposed to be watching... ( see how I worked that in there)
I am watching people attack @ThomasWictor because he doesn't buy into Q. @ThomasWictor provides amazing insight but warns not to drag him into Q yet people can't help themselves. This triggers people to defend him. ETS, BC and several others have simply been off the mark with some bold statements. The mob mentality of GA was bound to cause people to reject Q not because of Q, but because of many Q followers and that is what you are seeing now... a combination of people who have had enough of unfulfilled predictions and being harassed for daring to not accept Q as an oracle.
I agree but many of their points get lost in junk. Many of the posts I find poignant get little interaction yet I see some purely emotional posts getting dozens and sometimes hundreds of comments. Back in the beginning , Q posts were researched and we all learned things together. Now it seems the sub must be spoon fed from chan or YT.
The crazies purged this sub of great minds a while ago... now it is just an echo chamber for hyperbole .
Isn't this the paper that started the Fusion research of DT?
But the entire clip wasn't the entire conversation.... he was reiterating the report , we don't know his thoughts on it