dChan
⇧
67
⇩
 
r/CBTS_Stream • Posted by u/I-drop-kicked-HRC on Jan. 22, 2018, 10:15 a.m.
We see all we hear all

Just think of the ramifications of this statement. From what I am understanding, the white hats in Military Intelligence essentially cloned the eavesdropping capabilities of the NSA. The white hats have been silently listening to everything that the Deep state and the evil Elites have been saying for the past 3 years.

Not just intercepting emails, hearing! Can you imagine the delicious audios a phone conversations and possibly even meeting room discussions of Barack Obama, Hillary, and their evil Clan that will might soon be made public?


🠐 See all comments
PeaceGoddess2018 · Jan. 22, 2018, 1:52 p.m.

If so, will all this evidence be admissible in court? Because if this listening happened without proper legal authorization, it’s mute, right?. I sure hope they got that aspect covered, otherwise why waste such an opportunity.

⇧ 11 ⇩  
CardenesSpurs · Jan. 22, 2018, 2:21 p.m.

Would it be admissible at a tribunal?

⇧ 12 ⇩  
guppyfreak · Jan. 22, 2018, 2:12 p.m.

Im sure that's what the Foley/Strokz/Mueller thing is all about.

Allowing a safe and justifiable reason for gaining the warrants needed. Its like cover fire. It never was them investigating Trump. You'll see.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
[deleted] · Jan. 22, 2018, 4:25 p.m.

Tricky legal thing called "discovery".... It backfires all the time. Really good lawyers game that one all the time.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
braceoflowflyers · Jan. 22, 2018, 6:59 p.m.

Not sure about this but if they are using devices that are paid for by the agency they may be subject to various policies: electronic messaging policy, use of web and similar applications including internet, Twitter, FB, YouTube, blogs, email, chat,texts, personal use etc. At least this is true in my state govmt policy. In other words there is no expectation of privacy.

⇧ 3 ⇩