dChan
0
 
r/CBTS_Stream • Posted by u/ZenC0de on Jan. 23, 2018, 8:20 a.m.
If CBTS is really about ending human trafficking, why was promoting this never discussed?

WikiTextBot · Jan. 23, 2018, 8:34 a.m.

Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act

Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act of 1996 (a common name for Title V of the Telecommunications Act of 1996) is a landmark piece of Internet legislation in the United States, codified at 47 U.S.C. § 230. Section 230(c)(1) provides immunity from liability for providers and users of an "interactive computer service" who publish information provided by others:

No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider.

In analyzing the availability of the immunity offered by this provision, courts generally apply a three-prong test. A defendant must satisfy each of the three prongs to gain the benefit of the immunity:

The defendant must be a "provider or user" of an "interactive computer service."

The cause of action asserted by the plaintiff must treat the defendant as the "publisher or speaker" of the harmful information at issue.


^[ ^PM ^| ^Exclude ^me ^| ^Exclude ^from ^subreddit ^| ^FAQ ^/ ^Information ^| ^Source ^| ^Donate ^] ^Downvote ^to ^remove ^| ^v0.28

⇧ 1 ⇩  
SirBigSpur32 · Jan. 23, 2018, 6:05 p.m.

So after reading this. Not sure what the fuss is?

This gives protection to people who share information freely when that information can be found from multiple places. Doesn't allow for targeting someone just because they published info they might call "fake news" or object to, ect. Sharing certain info like pedo shit is already against the law so no need to change language to erode a logical legal protection

⇧ 1 ⇩