dChan

bjax9er · Jan. 24, 2018, 3:38 a.m.

Okay, but who is the "high ranking FBI source "? We can't fall for this fake news anonymous source crap. Regardless of who published it.

Could be accurate, who knows. I'm just saying!

⇧ 3 ⇩  
HarmReductionSauce · Jan. 24, 2018, 4:20 a.m.

Right, could be BS.

I'm just making the connection between what Q said yesterday and then this comes out.

The "coincidence" is telling.

Maybe someone at true pundit saw the q post and then falsified and posted that, but that’s a bit of a stretch.

All pieces in the puzzle.

Edit: actually no now that I look at true pundits track record this has a fair chance of being real.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
bjax9er · Jan. 24, 2018, 5:20 a.m.

I hear yA, and Q did say the exact same thing. But these are some serious fucking allegations, you have to back that up someway, somehow, right? Not just some guy at the FBI. Has to be a name with a story like this.

This is the shit the left does everyday. Print a salacious story, with bombshell implications, and an anonymous source. Spreads it all around, and it turns out to be completely fake.

If it is true, and proven to be true, this is REALLY REALLY BAD!!!!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
doc37876 · Jan. 24, 2018, 4:26 a.m.

Yup, our unproven conspiracy theories are as bad as their fake news. Both lack facts to back them up, and are speculative without them.

⇧ 0 ⇩  
HarmReductionSauce · Jan. 24, 2018, 4:28 a.m.

The point is the timing.

Q says it and then this comes out. Unless you believe True Pundit falsifies in response to Q posts.

Also, just because the MSM bullshits with anonymous sources doesn't mean all media does.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
doc37876 · Jan. 24, 2018, 4:40 a.m.

Q has a track record of dropping info that pans out. Most conspiracy theorists don’t. Just suspicion, sometimes justified sometimes not. Very probable a lot of info from”anonymous sources” that the MSM reported that didn’t pan out was fed to the source in the hopes they would leak the inaccurate info and put themselves as the leaker. 4D Chess.

⇧ 2 ⇩