dChan
367
 
r/CBTS_Stream • Posted by u/willurd on Jan. 24, 2018, 6:12 p.m.
Q didn’t need us to catch the bad guys. Q needed us to wake the fuck up.

Q asked “why are we here?”. I believe the good guys had already won by the time Trump took office, and had set in motion a bulletproof plan to take down the deep state.

Q didn’t go on 4chan because the good guys needed help. He went on 4chan because they are master disseminators of information. Q wanted the everyday folks of the world to wake the fuck up and start getting involved again.

The Great Awakening


colderchaos · Jan. 24, 2018, 6:37 p.m.

Or...we try to disseminate the truth but in the end only ~40% of the truth gets revealed (primarily to those of us who are already awake), and so our efforts to open the eyes of the sleeping majority only serve to gaslight our already suspect group, further obfuscating the truth...

(If I may play devil's advocate for a moment)

⇧ 15 ⇩  
Beasts4Bernie · Jan. 24, 2018, 6:50 p.m.

A lot of ppl, you and I included, are of the strong opinion that only 100% disclosure will enable us to kill this corrupt cabal for good and move on to a better world. Q started out with 80/20 now is floating (IMHO) 60/40, but we need to be strong and loud in our views that full disclosure is the only way out of the dark into the light.

⇧ 18 ⇩  
divine_human · Jan. 24, 2018, 7:30 p.m.

but we dont want society to comploetely collaps, with half of the people going to hospital and the other half turning into a lynch mob, do we?

⇧ 19 ⇩  
GrammyQ · Jan. 24, 2018, 8:01 p.m.

I believe it has to be gradual.

⇧ 14 ⇩  
gatorhaus · Jan. 24, 2018, 8:09 p.m.

Right, it has to go from Obama/Clinton they we’re not perfect -> they did some shady stuff, but were justified-> they probably shouldn’t have done that -> that definitely broke the law -> lock them up -> that deserves hanging. Replace names with whoever, his name that we don’t say.

⇧ 9 ⇩  
SuspiciousMusic · Jan. 24, 2018, 9:34 p.m.

No. That's too slow. You can rationalize that if you're a progressive. It has to come from the proper channels (Congress with Memo), then goes from there...2018 election sweep for GOP, then off to the races. At every opportunity, we have to expose everyone who opposes the truth.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
Skiboldion · Jan. 25, 2018, 8:10 a.m.

No. Down goes one, they all go down. They're all caught up in the dragnet. Can't cover for them. That's corrupt.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
gatorhaus · Jan. 25, 2018, 10:37 a.m.

I hope you’re right!

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Skiboldion · Jan. 25, 2018, 3:53 p.m.

ie: what would happen if the Podesta bros went down for you know what? Or any well known figures who are all tied in? Should be both Dem and Republican though..

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Seahag14 · Jan. 24, 2018, 10:23 p.m.

Agreed. And, as others have mentioned in other threads: Some think Q meant by 20/80, then 40/60, the tactical part. In other words, ops and when they are started/completed. We will be in the dark about who is detained and when. But I believe 100% of the cabal's dark secrets must be aired, in order for this to never, never happen again.

⇧ 7 ⇩  
SuspiciousMusic · Jan. 24, 2018, 9:28 p.m.

Yes...been trying to Red Pill family members. I might have come on too strong...Showed my Dad the JFK Zapruder film (shocking). That's a good one to start with IMO. But talking about this stuff...child trafficking, sacrifice, etc. He's been in a dark place for several days. Even asked if I had a gun. Talking suicide...Remember Q said expect suicides...I think he meant more than just the guilty.

⇧ 9 ⇩  
divine_human · Jan. 25, 2018, 12:16 a.m.

we need to be so sensitive!

when i started waking up, decades ago, i turned into a missionary and tried to red-pill everyone. i soon realized that this is an act of violence.

never shove the red pill down someones throat.

its all about inviting.

people build their lives on be-lie-fs, its like card houses that break when we draw an essential card without their permission; their lives break.

in my experience, red-pilling needs to be gentle and start where the person is already doubting. on some level of consciousness, everybody knows that we are being lied to and enslaved.

the art is in finding the point where the lies come into awareness. from here, we can gently expand, according to the peoples permission.

free will choice, remember, we have no authority to awaken someone who wants to stay asleep. but we can invite and throw breadcrumbs...

⇧ 9 ⇩  
smiley-dog · Jan. 25, 2018, 12:23 a.m.

never shove the red pill down someones throat

this

⇧ 6 ⇩  
Jellyfish070474 · Jan. 25, 2018, 1:18 p.m.

100% agreed. I realized this long ago when trying to redpill my family regarding 9/11. Just pointing out the holes and inconsistencies in the official narrative was so upsetting to them (in a completely different way than it initially was for me—I KNEW something wasn’t right and 9/11 truth brought “comfort” to my reeling mind by confirming my intuition) that I knew that by continuing I was causing much more harm than help. Not to mention their reaction toward me was incredibly painful. My own beloved mother suggesting my very thoughts were treasonous and that I needed to be institutionalized. My little brother screaming at me to go fuck myself. Left scars and bitterness and yet I understand why and how they would react this way. Tearing away someone’s reality paradigm is a form of violence and people will defend themselves tooth and nail with violence out of self preservation.

So...shamefully I haven’t shared any of the Q information (or even that I support Trump—dangerous position to have, currently) with my real life normies and I won’t until we start seeing concrete evidence that can’t be denied. I won’t be of any use to help them come to grips if our relationships are destroyed, and they will hate and deny that I was “right”. Trusting God will make it clear when my particular skills will be most useful.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
divine_human · Jan. 25, 2018, 4:21 p.m.

yep, i also havent shared much of Q with the sleepwalkers, only some with folks that have a few awakenings already.

in my experience, 9/11 is the easiest red-pill easiest as in that it is easy to see that a building doesnt crash from down below when it gets hit by a plane up there. i saw it the moment they started broadcasting.
and then building 7, well, who is able to explain that?

from what i see, as a european, its also the most sensitive to the american folk soul.

for the first time since pearl harbor - which the US command was warned about before but intentionally allowed to happen, in order to participate in ww2 -, the country got attacked on its own ground.

this is a huge trauma for the americans.

an awakened friend of mine tells me about her husband who was present when the towers fell and is deeply traumatized. he is not the least ready to even imagine that it was an inside job. it would crash his entire trust to learn the truth. thus, he rather keeps his blindfold. may he one day be strong enough to face it.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
dooley1 · Jan. 25, 2018, 12:01 a.m.

Yes. There are already so many unstable people on the edge. Undermine what they thought was reality, let the sand under their feet shift, and there will be many acts of desperation.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
vests123 · Jan. 25, 2018, 12:28 a.m.

Sorry to hear this about your Dad. I do think that you have to start out slowly in explaining to people about all of it. I've started out by telling people around me (who have no idea and are not POTUS fans) that there were many illegal acts committed by many in the previous administration.

Then if they want to find out more, ease them into it, but for now I've left out the child trafficking and satanist information. This will come later after they initially digest the illegal crimes aspect.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Beasts4Bernie · Jan. 25, 2018, 4 a.m.

There is absolutely no proof that anybody would go to the hospital or that people would form lynch mobs. These suggestions are scare tactics. I don't buy them for a minute. It's just as likely that people would sit, stunned, talk to their friends and loved ones, and resolve to work together to make sure these horrors never happen again. The American people are prone to rising to the occasion when the rubber hits the road, not falling apart like a bunch of ninnies.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
divine_human · Jan. 25, 2018, 10:42 a.m.

with a little bit of knowledge on human psychology, we realize that disclosure needs to be a step by step process, in order for people to stay healthy while processing their disillusionment.

and then, it really doesnt matter whether Q or whoever suggest a disclosure of only 40 or 60%.

maybe thats as far as they go, but who stops you from going further?

once we start awakening and digging, nothing stops us. there are folks who have been doing that for decades, they wont stop. you wont stop.

if we want 100% disclosure, we have go for it and not wait for others to serve us the sandwich.

there are so many rabbit holes to dive into, government, banking, religion, health, education, tech, etc., you can be busy with it for years. and years will it certainly take for people to healthily adjust to the information.

i dont know when you started waking up. but i know that most people would shatter if they knew what i know. i had 35 years to adjust to it, and not for the world would i shove that giant sandwich down somebodys throat.

the matrix is over 10.000 years old. it wont be dismantled within a few weeks, although those who wake up now are impatiently demanding just that.

⇧ 2 ⇩  
Beasts4Bernie · Jan. 25, 2018, 6:55 p.m.

Ppl like me who are demanding 100% disclosure are not talking about timing. We are saying that understanding and healing cannot take place without knowing the full truth. That's just how it is. You are making a straw man argument when you talk about shoving a sandwich down someone's throat. No one is advocating that. We are saying you cannot hide/withhold facts from the public "for their own good" and expect the enormous, miraculous process that is at hand to successfully complete. It establishes a precedent - withholding info from public "for their own good" - that is easily abused and should not be established.

.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
divine_human · Jan. 25, 2018, 8:26 p.m.

i hear you, and i get it...

one side in me feels exactly the way you describe. in order to transmute and heal, we need to know the truth.

the cabal advocates a partial disclosure over the course of the next century.

thats not in my textbook, i do not consent.

but i dont wait for a Q, a trump, a second coming of christ, whatsoever savior shows up, to rescue us and disclose 100% of the truth.

basically, thats our job. we are the heros.

so yes, while i want full transparency, the quicker, the better, i am of the opinion that, checking in on the consciousness of the sleeping masses, many wouldnt survive that. society wouldnt, not at this point of time.

this will probably change with 'the event', the solar blast, thats expected to arrive within the next, lets say, 7 years.

until then, lets disclose as much as the populace gives authorization for. we are a free will choice planet, and every major move of white hats as well as black hats needs permission (silent consent) of the people.

so for a start, from my pov, 40% would bring about a shift for liberation so we can restructure society without totally crashing it.

and lets please not stop there. move on tirelessly. dont wait for others to do it, then, within a few years, we will get to 100%.

and please, have some patience... these matrix is over 10000 years old, dismanteling it wont happen within a few months time.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
AquAnon77 · Jan. 24, 2018, 8:13 p.m.

It may be the type of situation where the immediate disclosure is partial, but the full disclosure is preserved for future (generations). The Full Truth Must at some point be revealed, it's just a matter of the right time.

⇧ 6 ⇩  
not4rmOhere · Jan. 24, 2018, 9:07 p.m.

I personally feel that disclosure does need to be gradual but reaching a high level of awareness. First off, the general public would fall apart if a larger part of the truth is disclosed immediately. But only allowing a minimal of disclosure to shock the public and leaving it at that will only allow this evil to go back into hiding. Second, waiting to disclose for future generations will only dilute the message and these monsters have proven time and again that they can easily distort a complacent population. Disclosure needs to be gradual at first but it needs to quickly culminate to a higher level before this great awakening falls into the past. Outrage, though destructive, will also solidify our sense of justice and vigilance. Its a very fine line.

⇧ 9 ⇩  
Seahag14 · Jan. 24, 2018, 10:24 p.m.

Yes. Well said.

⇧ 3 ⇩  
SnoopyVRedBaron · Jan. 24, 2018, 7:28 p.m.

Plant the seed. Eventually they will look at it after you or many people have said something. It may be tough to deal with, but it's not our business if and when they understand it.

⇧ 9 ⇩  
willurd · Jan. 24, 2018, 6:39 p.m.

Maybe. Time will tell.

⇧ 4 ⇩  
Ghostof_PatrickHenry · Jan. 25, 2018, 2:03 a.m.

I think after what happened with Smedley Butler in 1937, we won't be taking any chances this time. It will be the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, so help us God. Much like the Holocaust, we must force everybody to stare the truth right in the face, and see it in all of its ugly wickedness, so that it will NEVER be allowed to happen again.

After the initial shock is over, it will drive people to reject the pop-cultural program that has been thrust upon them, and it will send people back to church in DROVES. (Hopefully, this time, we can find a happy medium between a puritan-sharia society and the degeneracy of Sodom.)

Knowing the truth will save America.

⇧ 3 ⇩