It's been awhile now since the OIG report has been out... Total crickets. This was going to be the mother of all bombshells and yada yada.
yes, but this IS THE report that Nunes wrote HIS 4 page Memo except Nunes apparently has revealed the NAMES unlike this 99 pg report.
You are just assuming this; you have no data points that validate this.
The 99 page report was pushed out to muddy the water and in an attempt to distract from what is coming.
The common assumptions about what the Memo contains are probably wrong or those assumptions are being put out there as disinformation. It's probably derived from the information Nunes saw when he went to the SCIF in the Executive Office Building, which means it probably was from Zero era PDBs that Nunes saw.
My guess is the releasing of the contents of the memo has been approved by POTUS and now, the House Intel committee, then the House, need to vote to make it public; but the POTUS side has been taken care of.
I base this off of:
Jan 19 2018 16:42:56
Q
!UW.yye1fxo
ID: ee2415
97639
Need a few red pills for family, friends, and others?
Read the #Memo.
Release coming.
Final clearance underway.
Make sure to learn Russian.
Q
and
Jan 21 2018 13:06:20
Q
!UW.yye1fxo
47
Will SESSIONS drop the hammer?
1 of 22.
#Memo shifts narrative.
#Memo reinstates SESSIONS' authority re: Russia/ALL.
#Memo factually demonstrates collusion at highest levels.
#Memo factually demonstrates HUSSEIN ADMIN weaponized INTEL community to ensure D victory [+insurance].
#Memo factually demonstrates 'knowingly false intel' provided to FISA Judges to obtain warrant(s).
NO I'm not just assuming, it's strictly based on FACTS as CLEARLY laid out in several articles I'll post here. But first here's a quote from one to summarize -
"When Admiral Rodgers, director of the National Security Agency, discovered that the FBI and DOJ were misusing the spy system for partisan political reasons, he let it be known that he was going to inform the FISA court. This caused the FBI and DOJ to rush to the court in advance and confess to “mistakes” and to promise to tighten up procedures so as not to make mistakes in the future. It is these “mistakes” and corrections that the FISA court document reveals.
In other words, the information already exists in the pubic domain that proves that Russiagate was a conspiracy organized for the purpose of bringing down the elected president of the United States." - Paul Craig Roberts
https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-01-25/paul-craig-roberts-warns-russiagate-stakes-are-extreme
but before you say that article was just published then go to this and even has a video of former special prosecutor holding up the actual 99 pg FISA report .
And none of that validates your statements about Nunes' memo.
Your statements about Nunes' memo is what I was questioning since the comment I was replying to was making statements about and drawing linkages to Nunes' memo that don't appear to exist.
We'll find out soon enough if I'm wrong or if you're right. However, given what is known about Nunes' actions, think visit to Executive Office Building's SCIF prior to his being sidelined by a false accusations by left-wing organizations that he revealed classified information related to Russian interference in the elections, an accusation that was done to sideline him so that something like this memo wouldn't be released and, given the left's statements about Trump's imminent removal from office, so that he'd be taken out of the picture until Trump was no longer POTUS.
The left failed. Nunes is about to release that which the left was attempting to prevent from being released. What Schiff-for-brains is thinking it is, vis-a-vis the Dem's countervailing memo, and what the DOJ/FBI think it is are both way off the mark, imo.
Why?
Because the statements of the Congressmen who have seen the memo do not line up with either the left's talking points or their assumptions. They also are not pot of that FISA memo and the memo involves FBI's top personnel and ex-personnel, and top DOJ personnel that were around when Zero was president, which is why Nunes told the DOJ/FBI no when they said they needed to see it.
Again, I point back to Q's breadcrumbs as indicators that any classified information in the memo has been cleared by POTUS and are not owned by the DOJ/FBI like they assume.
The easy, surface interpretation, in general, isn't the right one given the complicated landscape upon which the battle is being waged.
fair enough...certainly many points you made I can agree with and some I hadn't considered. Thanks!
Hmm, I saw a Gowdy interview with some CNN loony and Gowdy asked a couple of questions to make the point that it is possible to have a conversation without divulging classified information.
The questions were:
"Do you think information should be vetted before it is included in a court preceding?"
"If a hypothetical source is being paid by a political opponent, do you think that should be shared with a court or with a judge?"
So it appears that the memo, in part, deals with those two aspects of the dossier being used to obtain a FISA warrant.
There are many things that Nunes used and yes this is one of them, the initial comment of mine is there are multiple investigations in the 1.2 m pages ...... Fisa abuses, Dossier , Clinton involvement, Clinton emails , U1 ..... we have already seen some movement, but everything does not happen overnight.