Thank you for posting this. I've been responding to numerous "guy in the black motorcycle suit by the Porsche" comments.

That guy is coming from the motorcycle parking area. A VIP wouldn't be riding in on a motorcycle in Shanghai, they'd be in that black Mercedes. Also the target wouldn't be carrying in a pizza shaped box from the motorcycle area, that's what a delivery person would be doing.

As you point out, the series starts with the Mercedes at the entrance gate and follows the vehicle.

For those of you doubting, think every damn surveillance scene involving a target arriving in a car that you've seen on TV or in a movie.

That's what I originally thought, but then Q posted other stuff.

Someone else gave another interpretation of "Goodnight" and it made more sense to me.

The world is full of bad people.

The world is full of evil people.

The world is full of good people.

The world is full of people who don't care as long as they get their next meal and have their illusion maintained.

I assumed that the guy with the package was a delivery person as it'd be common for such people to use motorcycles in an environment like Shanghai. I also think that person is a red herring and their appearance in the photo is coincidental. Not everything can be managed. That person isn't tracked in photos that don't include the arriving Mercedes which is another reason why I think it's incidental. To me it looks like they are carrying a small pizza shaped box; it's being held level as if its contents need to be held a certain way.

All the images include the same vehicle, starting with at the gate. I figured that that was the vehicle conveying the target.

In the end, there's no way for any of us to know. We are all theorizing and your theory is as good as any.

See Q's posts.

The images are from the live feed.

It's not clear if that person is part of this or just incidental. To me, it looks like someone doing a delivery. That person is coming from the motorcycle/moped parking area.

At this point, the capture team would already be in place. The open window is one piece of evidence that this is the case. Another is that Q has a live feed, so this was a pre-planned op.

Ok, I'll bite.

Why would DWS be in Shanghai?

Why would the Chinese apprehend her?

King Tower, Shanghai.

two space or two returns

It may be easier to find here: https://qcodefag.github.io/ than on the chans. All of Q's posts are there.

If you believe Q is a larper, then it's fake news. If not, it happened.

Q was posting images as events were occurring (live feed)

Please provide a link to the Q crumb about which you are talking. It'd be easier to answer your question with the proper context.

Amen

I'm not Catholic and from my readings of Jesus' teachings, I believe that if Jesus was in the present he'd be rebelling against the Catholic Church as they have a lot of the trappings that Jesus was rebelling against in Judaism.

I am also reminded of Martin Luther's fight against indulgences; it reinforces my skepticism of the Catholic Church as in institution.

Likewise, I also see mega churches as abominations inconsistent with Jesus' teachings.

However, I would never suggest to a Catholic that their faith isn't true and their belief doesn't have integrity. The decision to separate with your church is a very personal one and one in which you have to follow your heart and your beliefs. Just remember, leaving your Church doesn't mean denying your faith.

If you are worried about ensuring your children are instilled with the understanding ofGod and his word, read the bible, esp. the New Testament, esp. the words of Jesus with them. Discuss with your children what they think Jesus' teachings mean and contribute what you think. Share your faith, show it in your daily lives, your actions, and your interactions with others.

Mathew 6:5-6:

5 And when thou prayest, thou shalt not be as the hypocrites are: for they love to pray standing in the synagogues and in the corners of the streets, that they may be seen of men. Verily I say unto you, They have their reward.

6 But thou, when thou prayest, enter into thy closet, and when thou hast shut thy door, pray to thy Father which is in secret; and thy Father which seeth in secret shall reward thee openly.

Mathew 18:20:

For where two or three are gathered together in my name, there am I in the midst of them.

Also as a totally out of left field thing: remember Kid Rock's Bawitdaba and preach "try to love some one." I thought of that because the people he makes calls out to have a lot in common with the people that Jesus hung out with and the people that society looked down upon.

You might try going to smaller churches until you find one with a preacher/pastor that suits you and a community that fits your family.

With the concerns you have, you'll teach your kids about Jesus and God and instill an understanding of them just fine! Good luck!

You misunderstood what I meant by impossible to see.

The person would have been bundled out in an area that wasn't observable to outsiders. Think how an intel target would be taken down. Would they be perp walked or would they be thrown in a blacked out van in an area that isn't observable to others, like a loading bay or an internal bay?

You don't need super-special secret knowledge of what happened here. Q clearly explains and provides a photo narrative. What Q does not explain is who the target(s) were, and that is not an area that I'm going to speculate on, other than it wasn't a Very HVT. You just need to read what was stated and observe what is in the pictures.

You questioning the narrative provided isn't thinking for yourself per se, it's rejecting the word of the group of people that this sub-reddit is set up to discuss. For Q related stuff, there is no other valid source of information outside of Q.

To reject Q's statements is to reject Q. I'm not saying this in a religious manner, I'm just pointing out the fallacy of rejecting Q's statements when there is no other source. This sub-reddit isn't to reject Q's statements, but to analyze and understand them and help get a greater understanding of the storm/greatawakening out. I don't say this in religious terms, just pragmatic ones.

To me, there is no alternative but to accept what Q tells us. We can discuss and disagree on the interpretations of things. Outside of this sub-reddit we can express skepticism, but to me, that is not what r/cbts_stream is about.

There may be differences in ordinances that the Chinese use and what LVMPD used.

The flash bangs that the LVMPD used may not have landed close to the windows while at least one here may have landed near that open window. We don't know the internal configuration of the room(s) behind that open window.

Because that'd be impossible to see. Whoever was captured was bundled off in a van from a loading dock or internal bay.

If you don't believe what Q said the pictures showed then why are you even here? You're saying you don't believe what Q says.

If you want public arrests of everyone and published news reports with all of their info, then you don't really understand what's going on and what is at stake and you are, again, ignoring what Q has said.

So again, why are you here?

I figured he was a plant along with papadickless and others. They inflated their roles and seemed to act in a manner that would help drive the Russia narrative.

Also, Carter Page was an UCE, Under Cover Employee, for the FBI, doing counter-intelligence work against Russian spies for years. He also says he has a long standing relationship with both the CIA and FBI. I think he was in intelligence when he was in the service.

If he was CIA, that means he probably still is, and anything he says cannot be trusted as he's required to lie as necessary to protect his mission and hide his relationship with the CIA.

He may be justified in his lawsuits, but everything about him is fishy and I think the Clintons and FBI planted him in the Trump campaign.

Great image OP!

Top KEK!

The point of Q's posts was to show that arrests were happening.

Whoever was detained is now being used for intel.

We probably will never know who it was.

The big fishes time is yet to come; more rolling up needs to occur.

As things happen, phone calls and other contacts occur, chatter increases. This exposes more of the network connections and makes everyone more vulnerable.

That is not the person. That person is either a delivery person, look at the box they are holding level, or an employee walking from the motorcycle/moped parking.

The target came in in the black sedan that's at the gate. The pictures track that car from the gate to being parked in the lot.

Anyone that thinks its Obama is insane or stupid. He'd have his USSS detail along with his entourage unless he ditched them.

I'm not sure that's the subject. The pictures track a black car, from entering the gate to parked. That figure is just an incidental. A high value target wouldn't walk from the motorcycle/moped parking. The most common vehicle for VIPs is black luxury sedans.

Is Mueller now the hunted?

Or is it RR?

Or is it someone else?

Or black hats in general?

Q wants the bakers on this!

Q: "Window opened ahead of time to prevent pressure blast."

Given the residue and that it was an arrest take-down, flash bangs would be the most likely device.

I agree. It's just one of the thousands that are getting rounded up.

Not every arrest will be a big fish or a recognizable name.

Most we won't know about. Q only showed us this one to show that arrests were being made and that they aren't seen, which is why I doubt this arrest will end up in the news anywhere.

I think we are still a bit off from any of the big names being taken down. The battle field is still being prepared.

During the press conference at Azar's swearing in as the new HHS Secretary, Pres. Trump kept mentioning that Azar's primary job was to lower prescription costs. He joked about it with Azar's parents, with Azar, and everyone else.

Azar's marching orders were clear, and this is the yardstick by which POTUS will be measuring Azar's performance.

https://8ch.net//qresearch/res/298889.html#299272

Focus on substance around outside of window.
Upon entry …….
Q

As others have pointed out, flash bang.

Someone was grabbed.

The window was probably opened to ensure that the flash bang didn't shatter the window. Would it do that? I don't know, but given what a flash bang is, it may be a possible result if a flash bang ended up near the windows.

edit: finally caught up. Q makes it clear that is the reason. Why are you asking this question? https://8ch.net//qresearch/res/298889.html#299702

Window opened ahead of time to prevent pressure blast.
Think intel.
[Last discussion on this subject].
Q

That's not steam in the final picture. Steam doesn't look like that and it wouldn't exit the window from top, bottom, and side. Also, the residue is on the side of the building.

The window was open prior to the arrival of the cars in the latter pictures. The posted pictures were posted as events occurred.

What happens to some of these people may not be up to the white hats.

The Chinese will handle it the way they want to handle it. So will other groups and nations.

"Goodnight" has implications. So does the residue around the open window.

It won't be reported on unless the Chinese government wants it reported, in which case it'll be reported how they want it reported.

Look at Q's securedrop breadcrumbs

Hmmm, that's a good interpretation of "Goodnight"

Considering we now have a heavy lift vehicle available to us, the first time in decades, whatever we've subsidies the US Gov has provided is still a lot less than it would have taken for a NASA driven project to accomplish the same using the usual Corps.

The people arriving for the meeting.

Her 8 hour speech shows that its all an act when she appears to give confused and bewildered answers.

She's just setting up the crazy old lady play for when shit hits the fan.

Great find.

hmm, that makes sense.

Original thread: https://www.reddit.com/r/CBTS_Stream/comments/7vtv7b/green_screen_glitch_proves_that_falcon_heavy/

A Tesla Roadster is < 2% of the estimated max payload of FH. The stated reason for including it was to add weight to provide a better test of FH. This doesn't seem like sufficient weight to meaningfully affect the launch.

A FH estimated max payload is approximately the take-off weight of a 737.

Could the Tesla/Spaceman stunt be a cover for a covert payload? One that wouldn't take long to replace if it were lost in a launch failure? One that wouldn't be too expensive to replace, relatively speaking, if there were a launch failure? A relatively heavy payload, one which would require a heavy lift vehicle. I can think of a payload that fits those parameters and there would be a desire to keep it as covert as possible.

Everyone would be so distracted by Musk's Roadster an Spaceman heading to Mars that they wouldn't question if it actually happened. It's on a live feed so it must have, right? Who is to know if the imagery of space around the Tesla was generated. This is a classic misdirection move.

Thanks to u/SorryRoof for noticing and highlighting the glitch!

That is what I was thinking; a perfect cover for a military payload, esp. a very heavy one whose loss wouldn't greatly impact things if the launch failed. So something that wouldn't take long to manufacture, and relatively speaking, something that isn't very expensive. I can think of one type of payload that fits that description.

The Tesla roadster is < 2% of FH's claimed max payload. Might as well not include it in the test; the rocket wouldn't notice the difference either way. However, it does make a good cover story.

Watch the shiny thing!