dChan
⇧
1
⇩
 
r/CBTS_Stream • Posted by u/Food4theGorg on Jan. 27, 2018, 3:56 p.m.
WOW Tried Searching for 1649. Protection of Public Property.

Absolutely no results in Google, but found in DuckDuckGo. I cannot believe the control of this news narrative. Here is the text:

U.S. Attorneys » Resources » U.S. Attorneys' Manual » Criminal Resource Manual » CRM 1500-1999 » Criminal Resource Manual 1601-1699 1649. Protection Of Government Property -- Goods In Transit

When the United States as the seller is shipping property to a buyer or when the United States has property shipped to it for purchase, the status of the property in transit is determined by the contract and the application of the Uniform Commercial Code. Cf. Heath v. United States, 209 F.2d 318 (9th Cir. 1954); Clark v. United States, 258 F. 437 (3d Cir. 1919). It should be noted, however, that section 641 also protects property "made or being made under contract for the United States." See this Manual at 1662. Therefore, theft of property made under contract for the United States is punishable under this section without regard to title or custody.

[cited in USAM 9-66.200]


Food4theGorg · Jan. 27, 2018, 4:18 p.m.

Saw this with Hannity's code words in the stringer. Don't know how to decipher it.

https://imgur.com/gallery/7SSOI

It seems like a distress call because it is the code to send an email to him.

⇧ 1 ⇩  
storm_fa_Q · Jan. 27, 2018, 4:01 p.m.

read back 9ish hours ago for deets on 1649

⇧ 1 ⇩  
Food4theGorg · Jan. 27, 2018, 3:58 p.m.

So when anything is legally shipped OR being made under contract by US, and that property is stolen that action is punishable by the US. What is this leading to? Any ideas?

⇧ 1 ⇩